|
Replies: 25
| visibility 3
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
usuc supporters(SUCKERS) have thin skins and low self esteem
Jan 19, 2013, 2:14 PM
|
|
they come to our site and get offended... I will say they have maintained a higher level of mediocrity than the Tigers recently, but we have a much brighter future; their LUCK will run out at some point...
GO TIGERS
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Champion [110865]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
we'll see, they've got a taste of consistent winning, i'm
Jan 19, 2013, 2:17 PM
|
|
not sure they'll go away willingly.
at what point do we stop considering their winning "luck"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
the fact is that their glorious rise
Jan 19, 2013, 2:59 PM
|
|
is due to $ec EZ rivals all falling at the same time; no debate about that. They have beaten alot of mediocre/bad teams while being outplayed (ECU, Navy, UK...) relying on late turnovers and/or hail marys... The best W was at home against an eventual 3 loss Ala. They were lucky to land the three best prospects out of SC since Stephen Davis, at one time...
As far as the Tigers go, sos nailed it when she said that we have alot of good players, they just don't play good against them...
rivals will not be down forever
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Champion [110865]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
there's a lot of folks that will say the same about clemson
Jan 19, 2013, 3:08 PM
|
|
the last 2 years.
scar has finished in the top 10 in back to back years; we laud our finish and shoot holes in theirs while they've beaten us 4 years in a row?
why can't we simply acknowledge their accomplishments, congratz them on their 4 streak, then go out and beat them this year?
wouldn't the win be that much sweeter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
OK, conrats for the heights you have reached, and
Jan 19, 2013, 3:29 PM
|
|
I can only hope we can get there one day... But the fact is they are very fortunate to have alot of those W's and they want the respect due an elite team
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Champion [110865]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 64972
Joined: 2006
|
did that hurt? it seemed like it might have.
Jan 19, 2013, 3:38 PM
|
|
i really don't know what all that meant. i hope 'you' wasn't meant for 'me'.
if it's 'them'[scar], cool.
i think we've[clemson] been there before don't you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [12]
TigerPulse: 16%
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [75834]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 119018
Joined: 1998
|
Re: usuc supporters(SUCKERS) have thin skins and low self esteem
Jan 19, 2013, 2:17 PM
|
|
poultry- usually has a thin crispy skin if properly prepared. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10883]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12942
Joined: 2012
|
Yes Spurrier will get old, players will get arrested, and
Jan 19, 2013, 2:18 PM
|
|
the fans (including bandwagon fans) will once again scurry back to the abyss of insignificance...I have foreseen it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [47]
TigerPulse: 90%
5
|
Re: usuc supporters(SUCKERS) have thin skins and low self esteem
Jan 19, 2013, 2:32 PM
|
|
Their bubble will pop next year...think they will probably lose at least 4 games.....they graduate 9 on defense....no way that Clowney can play all 11 positions. Lattimore & Sanders gone....they will be 0 - 3 or 1 -2 after the first three games....UGA game for us should decide if we can go undefeated nest year....certainly no one in conference should beat us if they stay focused....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
20
|
Re: usuc supporters(SUCKERS) have thin skins and low self esteem
Jan 19, 2013, 2:44 PM
|
|
Lattimore has been gone most of last year and the year before. I don't see where that will make much difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [123]
TigerPulse: 16%
11
|
Re: usuc supporters(SUCKERS) have thin skins and low self esteem
Feb 5, 2025, 6:44 PM
|
|
I think it's the opposite. I think you're sore losers. You get all pissy because you've lost to your rival 4 years in a row and you can't accept it. Instead of being reasonable, you defame kids you've never even met before and you throw out "class" like you actually know the meaning of the word. It's laughable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
that's what I'm talking about, trolls... TIGER ENVY
Jan 19, 2013, 3:04 PM
|
|
I don't blame them for hating the TIGERS. Dabo didn't take the shortcuts...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [123]
TigerPulse: 16%
11
|
Re: that's what I'm talking about, trolls... TIGER ENVY
Jan 19, 2013, 3:17 PM
|
|
Why would I be envious of anything Clemson related? I'm not rooting for a team that's staring down the barrel of a 5th straigh loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [123]
TigerPulse: 16%
11
|
Re: that's what I'm talking about, trolls... TIGER ENVY
Jan 19, 2013, 3:18 PM
|
|
straight*
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
as long as yall feel good about mediocrity...
Jan 19, 2013, 3:31 PM
|
|
I don't;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [123]
TigerPulse: 16%
11
|
Re: as long as yall feel good about mediocrity...
Jan 19, 2013, 3:35 PM
|
|
I'm happy with where SC is now. Back to back 11 win seasons as well as 4 straight convincing victories over your rival. I can guarantee I'm happier than you are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1321]
TigerPulse: 97%
28
|
My personal happiness isn't determined by a bunch of
Jan 20, 2013, 12:35 PM
|
|
18-24 year old kids and what they do. If yours is, I really have pity on your trite and meaningless life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
another troll sucker***
Jan 20, 2013, 2:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [12]
TigerPulse: 16%
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
we can't spell sucker without U S C***
Jan 19, 2013, 3:32 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [12]
TigerPulse: 16%
2
|
Re: we can't spell sucker without U S C***
Jan 20, 2013, 1:50 PM
|
|
Or "lemon" without Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
can't argue with that one
Jan 20, 2013, 2:47 PM
|
|
maybe we should have had some special yellow uniforms at some point during the tb years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [195]
TigerPulse: 27%
12
|
vardry
Jan 19, 2013, 3:34 PM
|
|
Cant acknowledge accomplishments bc they are not good enough. Going 11-2 in a great conference can only bebecause the conference is down. He has no problem taking pride in 11-2 clemson with wins over wake (lost to vandy), nc state (lost to UT) and a loss to FSU (lost to UF)....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [598]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
correct
Jan 20, 2013, 9:15 AM
|
|
11-2 is not good enough. That's the difference, THE SUCKERS are happy knowing this is the highest you'll ever be and THE TIGERS are not, the sky is our limit. Good observation
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10883]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12942
Joined: 2012
|
So I guess Clemson wouldn't stand a chance against
Jan 20, 2013, 12:09 PM
[ in reply to vardry ] |
|
Vandy, UT, or UF? I guess this kinda logic makes sense b/c we lost to USuC, and USuC lost to LSU...that'd mean we wouldn't stand a chance against LSU...oh wait...
My point is, don't use one loss (per team) to make a point. You forgot to throw Louisville in there...I guess they can beat anyone Florida has beaten...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 3
|
|
|
50
