|
Replies: 15
| visibility 23
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45333
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson-Wake Forest depth charts released
Oct 1, 2018, 11:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1237]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
H-Back, need to research this
Oct 1, 2018, 11:40 AM
|
|
My first thoughts are we plan on running more and we need much better pass pro, both of which the H-Back can help with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41697]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43377
Joined: 1998
|
When is the last time we had a H-Back or Fullback
Oct 1, 2018, 11:42 AM
|
|
besides the Jumbo package?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1237]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: When is the last time we had a H-Back or Fullback
Oct 1, 2018, 12:15 PM
|
|
I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5700]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: When is the last time we had a H-Back or Fullback
Oct 1, 2018, 12:22 PM
|
|
The way we have used our TE in the spread option is what is commonly called an H-back, 3-back or FB by many teams. A pure TE lines up on the LOS with a standard split to the OT. A split end lines up a little further toward the slot. An H-back or 3-back usually lines up behind and to either side of the OT and can motion easily to become a lead blocker t the point-of-attack. I think this is nothing other than a way for the team to add another blocker/receiver into the scheme without confusing the issue with naming them TE1 and TE2. With H-back, the position can be drawn on the playbook without changing anything else except removing one of the WRs...... makes it easy to introduce as a scheme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1237]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: When is the last time we had a H-Back or Fullback
Oct 1, 2018, 12:33 PM
|
|
Thanks. I'm mainly interested in why list it now but not previously, if we've used it in the past and not listed it, if that makes sense.
The more I think about this the more I believe that, based upon Saturdays successful ground attack, we're going a little more Pro style. Or a more traditional run/pass scheme vs. strictly RPO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10754]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2111]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
we had Richard and Williams in a lot this week
Oct 1, 2018, 11:57 AM
[ in reply to H-Back, need to research this ] |
|
Williams was doing a lot of work and help spring our RBs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1237]
TigerPulse: 93%
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2260]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
IM OUTRAGED
Oct 1, 2018, 11:45 AM
|
|
Is what I would say if I disagreed with this depth chart
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5702]
TigerPulse: 98%
39
|
Ross, Renfrow, and Higgins...
Oct 1, 2018, 11:50 AM
|
|
Would love to have them on the field at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [266]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: Ross, Renfrow, and Higgins...
Oct 1, 2018, 12:16 PM
|
|
Kendall Hinton at WR for Wake...didn't know they had made that swap. Could be sneaky trying to guard both him and Dortch if they go double slots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3717]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: Ross, Renfrow, and Higgins...
Oct 1, 2018, 12:23 PM
[ in reply to Ross, Renfrow, and Higgins... ] |
|
We did at the beginning of the game, not so much later. Several key downs we had Ross, Kendrick and Thompson in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17796]
TigerPulse: 95%
51
Posts: 26611
Joined: 2006
|
so that means lawrence is cleared to play?***
Oct 1, 2018, 12:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1640]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: so that means lawrence is cleared to play?***
Oct 1, 2018, 1:55 PM
|
|
Maybe, but regardless we aren't going to let Wake know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [16034]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 17550
Joined: 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 23
|
|
|
50
