Re: Reasons I don't believe the assassination attempt was a conspiracy...

.... orchestrated by a group of people.

Let's say some group of people wanted Trump killed. Call them G. I don't care if G is funded by some left wing political group, if G is a terrorist organization or if G is part of someone in our own government.

1. You don't hire someone as unqualified as the shooter to be your shooter.
2. You don't train him to show up at a check point with a range finder, and use the range finder in front of LEOs in such a manner that they notice him and actually come up to him and talk to him.
3. You don't train him to walk around the building in full view of spectators for several minutes before climbing up on the roof.
4. You don't have him climb up on the roof in full view of spectators to the point that they see him and notify LEOs that he is on the roof.
5. You don't plan the shooting so that the shooter has absolutely no chance for escape. Professional assassins are not the same people who operate on a "suicide by cop" agenda.

The only explanation that seems to fit the fact to me is:
1. The shooter acted alone. What his motive was is yet to be and may never fully be learned.
2. The poor security was due to the leadership from SS on site, the ones who made the security plans and approved the security plans and implemented the security plans were incompetent. But, they didn't conspire to have Trump assassinated. If they had and this was the best plan they could come up with then they are even more incompetent than I am giving them credit for being.
3. I believe, but cannot prove, the incompetence was due at least in great part to their complacency. They just didn't take the probability of danger seriously. Note: I'm not talking about every agent who was there. I'm talking about the leadership who planned and approved the security measures.

Message was edited by: bretfsu®

RememberTheDanny

110%er [8419]

TigerPulse: 96%

Posts: 10847

Joined: 10/6/21

CIA works hard to identify misfits and cultivate them

Jul 18, 2024, 7:09 PM [ in reply to I'm missing something. How? ]

It’s no secret that the FBI and CIA searches social media to identify kids (also adults) who appear to be unhappy social misfits. They cultivate friendly relationships with these misfits via chats, fake pics, etc.

FBI and CIA don’t just seek single target misfits. They look for as many candidates that they can find, see if they can develop enough of a friendship / kinship with each candidate misfit and then attempt to influence them.

This ‘grooming’ technique is like that of how a sexual predators identify targets that might be successfully groomed to become his ‘sex friend.’

This is how the FBI finds and cultivates human assets in ‘groups’ that they believe are dangerous. Troll around on social media sites for responsive people, cull out those who shy away from the escalation dialogue, and intensify the influencing activity until one or more people within the 'dangerous group' start revealing the activities and action plans being organized from within the group. ideally, the groomed asset works to introduce the FBI / CIA asset as a vetted new eager person to be brought into thebgroup.

(?). What does that have to do with Mr. Crooks the shooter? The FBI / CIA identification of groomable targets includes seeking out not only characteristics, but also skills among the target groomee. Chat about hunting. What guns do you own? Oh, you use a range finder - how does that work. Dang, you plan your deer shot to account for wind speed & direction? Stuff like that.

(*). Professional assassins probably have an inkling that, after the shooting (whether successful or not) is a matter that can never be told. At a big public event, the shooter will either be captured or killed. Ideology is not the objective of a professional assassin. Money is.

(*). Although less than ideal to use a skilled amateur instead of a professional, it is reasonable that a skilled amateur is the best that the FBI / CIA could get for the job. They killed him, immediately swept young Mr. Crooks home for all computers, and seized his phone. Magically, the world’s greatest law enforcement agency could not figure out how to un-encrypt his phone for a few days.

(***). I am not saying that this is a government orchestrated conspiracy to assassinate Trump. I am saying that these ‘the matter is proven; it was a lone shooter acting on his own’ narrative is very premature.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Reasons I don't believe the assassination attempt was a conspiracy...

Your post leans more toward a conspiracy than not.***

I'm missing something. How?

and remember we're talking about this kid

Re: and remember we're talking about this kid

Have you ever seen the movie Arlington Road?

You're pretty stupid if you think this was orchestrated by our government***

Yea, theyve never done anything like that.***

Except they've succeeded quite remarkably when they have

Thats exactly who would be hired***

Exactly. Just like the Whitmer hoax. This is the FBI MO***

Leave your usual shout-it-down stunt in the closet, OK?

I know I dont. And you dont either.

Re: I know I dont. And you dont either.

Wow, what a sleuth you are

I think everything is because of conditioning.

"Everything that confuses me is a conspiracy."***

Your theories arent close to what would be considered

Re: Have you ever seen the movie Arlington Road?

It's the natural progression.

In other news, do you know what Trump shot on Sunday?

CIA works hard to identify misfits and cultivate them

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Haha he probably actually believes the nonsense

"51 current and former intel officials" is all you really need to know.

They're still investigating the other phone from his house with 27 contacts of