|
Replies: 135
| visibility 22400
|
Trainer [41]
TigerPulse: 100%
5
|
South Carolina Loss
16
16
Dec 9, 2024, 9:42 AM
|
|
As upset as I am to lose to them, getting in the playoffs over them is very funny. Their season comes down to beating us. That is all they talk about for a whole year. no wbb talk, nothing. They would rather beat us than win a national championship because they know they have an actual chance. one game vs a whole season of work. I will take a national championship over a state championship any day. At least for another 30 years, until they make the rivalry close again.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
5
26
5
26
Dec 9, 2024, 9:43 AM
|
|
championship?
Or at the end of the day will your playoff berth just be a participation trophy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32248]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18344
Joined: 2008
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
33
33
Dec 9, 2024, 9:45 AM
|
|
This is priceless coming from someone whose team will never see the playoffs---let alone win a conference championship. Let's start there. LMAO
You idiots never fail to disappoint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [3087]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
3
Dec 10, 2024, 10:04 PM
|
|
As Mark Twain said, don’t argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43793]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11119
Joined: 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [12006]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 10044
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32248]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18344
Joined: 2008
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
13
13
Dec 9, 2024, 9:48 AM
|
|
Never confuse a coot with facts/numbers/percentages. They only use coot logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1890]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
2
Dec 10, 2024, 8:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
I think they gave Texas an 82% chance of beating us, so let's say we have an 18% chance of winning our first game. Let's compare that to the coots chances of winning their playoff game this year. *Checks Google*......hmmm I guess that's 0%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24314]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1809]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32248]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18344
Joined: 2008
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
8
8
Dec 9, 2024, 10:00 AM
|
|
What's even funnier is they don't have any trophies in the modern era....none.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [412]
TigerPulse: 97%
17
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
1
Dec 15, 2024, 7:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Here’s their Trophy Case
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [956]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7198]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
^^^THIS^^^***
2
Dec 10, 2024, 8:28 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [68630]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 90381
Joined: 2001
|
You mean like the trophy that is given...
8
8
Dec 9, 2024, 9:56 AM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
for playing in the cheese cracker bowl?
It's akin to losing in the first round of the NCAA Tournament v. winning the NIT. The odds may be low but if you aren't in the real tournament, you have zero chance of winning it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
But everyone knows the NIT Champion is more deserving
1
8
8
Dec 9, 2024, 10:00 AM
|
|
than the 16th seed who is there as a participation trophy, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [68630]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 90381
Joined: 2001
|
I'd say very few people really believe...
6
6
Dec 9, 2024, 10:02 AM
|
|
that winning a conference championship is the equivalent of a participation trophy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32248]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18344
Joined: 2008
|
Re: I'd say very few people really believe...
6
6
Dec 9, 2024, 10:05 AM
|
|
The coots know more about participation trophies than anyone. That's what makes this so hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32248]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18344
Joined: 2008
|
Re: I think very few people really believe that they're better than their rival
7
7
Dec 9, 2024, 10:15 AM
|
|
You were luckier this year. It's as simple as that. Y'all scored on busted plays because your QB has a horseshoe firmly planted up his ###. Any argument to the contrary is just ignorance on display.
But hey--I'm really glad Clemson gave you idiots something to watch on TV this year. Maybe you can learn something about big boy football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1857]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3326]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32943]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 35677
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
Those are two SEC teams so it's honestly hard
1
6
6
Dec 9, 2024, 10:23 AM
|
|
to tell considering how top to bottom the SEC is above other conferences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32943]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 35677
Joined: 2003
|
especially when you smoke the espn hype pipe all day***
3
Dec 9, 2024, 10:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1857]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
Re: Those are two SEC teams so it's honestly hard
1
Dec 9, 2024, 11:10 AM
[ in reply to Those are two SEC teams so it's honestly hard ] |
|
LMAO using a debateable point that you ##### HAVE NEVER CONTRIBUTED TO and YOU NEVER WILL!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [376]
TigerPulse: 95%
16
|
Re: Those are two SEC teams so it's honestly hard
1
Dec 11, 2024, 2:55 PM
[ in reply to Those are two SEC teams so it's honestly hard ] |
|
Are they? Let's ask jawga how good ga.tech is. Let's ask kentucky how good Louisville is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1422]
TigerPulse: 93%
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [68630]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 90381
Joined: 2001
|
You won the game but you were hardly the better team...
7
7
Dec 9, 2024, 10:22 AM
[ in reply to I think very few people really believe that they're better than their rival ] |
|
In fact, you only led for less than two minutes the entire game.
If Cade sees a wide open Antonio Williams in the end zone on that final play instead of forcing the ball to Phil Mafah, the outcome is very different, but whatever helps you sleep at night princess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
I have no doubt you would find that a very compelling argument
3
1
Dec 9, 2024, 10:27 AM
|
|
if the roles were reversed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [68630]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 90381
Joined: 2001
|
Again...whatever helps you sleep at night princess!
3
Dec 9, 2024, 10:50 AM
|
|
If you thought UofSC had any REAL chance of getting in the CFP, you were simply setting yourself up for disappointment.
You had a better season than many expected, but you lost to both Ole Miss and Bama who were both ranked ahead of you in the CFP poll and both of those teams won their final games. The likelihood that you were going to jump them, or Miami and Arizona State for that matter, was remote at best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1932]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2663]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8400]
TigerPulse: 97%
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
Isn't the last minute
1
4
Dec 9, 2024, 10:56 AM
|
|
the only minute that matters?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8400]
TigerPulse: 97%
43
|
You think the better team always wins? LOL. Thats cute.***
1
Dec 9, 2024, 11:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78934]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 29274
Joined: 2018
|
You've waited a long time to run your mouth here.
3
Dec 9, 2024, 11:15 AM
[ in reply to Isn't the last minute ] |
|
I'd have waited a little more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
Fortunately you won't find any posts from me
3
Dec 9, 2024, 11:20 AM
|
|
arguing we were the better team when we lost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12613]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Fortunately you won't find any posts from me
2
Dec 10, 2024, 8:05 AM
|
|
LSU? Didn’t the refs beat y’all? Come on man
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [152]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Re: Fortunately you won't find any posts from me
Dec 15, 2024, 11:55 PM
|
|
LSU? Didn’t the refs beat y’all? Come on man
LSU? Didn’t the refs beat y’all? Come on man
This.
That's all.SC fans have done this year ... likely.including Class09 as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [51]
TigerPulse: 95%
6
|
Re: Isn't the last minute
Dec 10, 2024, 7:51 AM
[ in reply to Isn't the last minute ] |
|
That what your sister said!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [51]
TigerPulse: 95%
6
|
Re: Isn't the last minute
Dec 10, 2024, 7:52 AM
|
|
COOT 09 your sister said last minute is all that matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [152]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Re: Isn't the last minute
Dec 15, 2024, 11:54 PM
[ in reply to Isn't the last minute ] |
|
the only minute that matters?
Hmmm. Pretty sure SC fans, including you, argued last year that the only reason Clemson won was bc of a lucky scoop and score after an errant backwards pass ... that occurred in the first few minutes of the game.
You guys went on and on that SC shouldve won and were the better team but that one bad break.
First few.minutes, last few minutes (or minute) ... either last year Clemson was the better team (which I still hear we were not) or this year they were (won last year on flukey play early, lost this year on a flukey play late)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28756]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 13324
Joined: 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
Of course I am
3
Dec 9, 2024, 12:35 PM
|
|
because I am quite reasonable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [306]
TigerPulse: 83%
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9276]
TigerPulse: 75%
44
Posts: 19378
Joined: 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69831]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 19500
Joined: 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [152]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Re: I think very few people really believe that they're better than their rival
Dec 15, 2024, 11:50 PM
[ in reply to I think very few people really believe that they're better than their rival ] |
|
after losing to them.
That's funny ... bc if we are talking one year at a time, that's all we heard last year: that SC was really the better team and that Clemson got LUCKY on a single confusing backward pass play early in game ... that Clemson couldn't even score an offensive TD. Also, listened to SC fans say they were actually the better team this year verse LSU and AL and that they got robbed. So, based on your own fan base, I am not sure what people actually believe.
But, over the years (ignoring conference strength since its head to head you are talking about) ... won 7 of last 9 games. That includes during 2 national titles seasons in which Clemson beat SC. 6 CFP appearences, again during seasons when Clemson beat SC. Didn't get to playoffs last 3 seasons...beat SC twice, lost once. Then this year was a loss. Maybe it's a lot like SC games vs AL and LSU, huh? Maybe we just had a bad game, like SC did or were unlucky. Maybe not. That's not my opinion ... I think we got beat due to better coaching on SC side that day and a bad break on a tipped ball at the end (remember the LUCKY break we caught last year?),For me, SC had better team that day this year.
Who cares? Can't over focus on one year. BC almost no one can win them all in football and few teams do (Pitt beat us in 2016 before we won the national title ... and I wouldn't say Pitt was overall better than us that year ... but they were that night.)
Eventually if you go to CFP as much as Clemson has recently, it's gonna happen in a season on which your rival beats you (ask Ohio State, lol!). Recent trend definitely suggests more parity bt the two. Definitely don't like that!. But that's a different issue.
So SC loss stings. Absolutely. But in the grand scheme, losing to rival once out 7 seasons that you make.the CFP is probably a statistical likelihood.
Clemson did what it took to get in. Is what it is. Do I think we can win it all? Odds are against us, no doubt. But Clemson gets to try and find out. That's all that counts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17360]
TigerPulse: 91%
51
Posts: 27489
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1857]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
Re: But everyone knows the NIT Champion is more deserving
1
Dec 9, 2024, 11:06 AM
[ in reply to But everyone knows the NIT Champion is more deserving ] |
|
Conference Champion to you little ####. Something you haven’t been able to say since 1969 and that’s the only one you will ever win!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2842]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [141]
TigerPulse: 83%
11
|
Re: But everyone knows the NIT Champion is more deserving
1
Dec 10, 2024, 8:23 AM
[ in reply to But everyone knows the NIT Champion is more deserving ] |
|
Listening to the Beamer interview, he’d rather go to Cheez-It Bowl than the playoff because of the team building in Orlando. Have fun at Universal and Disney.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1531]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: But everyone knows the NIT Champion is more deserving
1
Dec 10, 2024, 8:01 PM
[ in reply to But everyone knows the NIT Champion is more deserving ] |
|
It’s hilarious that your best season in a decade results in the Citrus Bowl, while one of Clemsons worst seasons this decade results in a conference championship and playoff birth lmfao.
Forever to Thee little brother status.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
Really just highlights the problem with auto-bids for conference champions
2
1
Dec 10, 2024, 10:01 PM
|
|
not all conferences are equal.
Clearly the better team was left out of the playoffs so it de-legitimizes the playoffs themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1531]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: Really just highlights the problem with auto-bids for conference champions
1
Dec 11, 2024, 8:15 AM
|
|
By your logic, Arkansas should have been in over Tennessee.
Michigan over Ohio St.
BYU over SMU.
Northern Illinois over ND.
Kentucky over UGA.
See where there’s a flaw in your logic?
It’s football, the best team doesn’t always win. That’s why the play the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
Re: Really just highlights the problem with auto-bids for conference champions
1
Dec 11, 2024, 2:49 PM
|
|
Arkansas was 6-6 and Tennessee was 10-2
Michigan was 7-5 and Ohio State was 10-2
BYU was more deserving than SMU
Northern Illinois was 7-5 and ND was 11-1, also won in week 2.
Kentucky didn't beat UGA.
There are a lot of reasons to support those were legitimate upsets.
Carolina and Clemson were both 9-3 and the game was two weeks ago. There is a lot of evidence Carolina was just the better team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [152]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Re: Really just highlights the problem with auto-bids for conference champions
Dec 16, 2024, 12:04 AM
|
|
Arkansas was 6-6 and Tennessee was 10-2
Michigan was 7-5 and Ohio State was 10-2
BYU was more deserving than SMU
Northern Illinois was 7-5 and ND was 11-1, also won in week 2.
Kentucky didn't beat UGA.
There are a lot of reasons to support those were legitimate upsets.
Carolina and Clemson were both 9-3 and the game was two weeks ago. There is a lot of evidence Carolina was just the better team.
Yeah. But now you are getting into a ton of subjectivity. I'm pretty sure a lot of fans from those schools would disagree with you and want in bc of their wins. That won't work.
Your point is silly. The system has NEVER been perfectly fair. Going from 2 to 4 to 12 didnt fix any of the flaws ... just expanded the number of arguments
They current system is flawed. Concur. But your conference leadership is responsible for it. And relax, very soon SEC and B1G will have their own league ... and SC can compete to get into its minor league playoffs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1791]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6387]
TigerPulse: 96%
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32248]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18344
Joined: 2008
|
Re: You mean like the trophy that is given...
4
Dec 9, 2024, 10:02 AM
[ in reply to You mean like the trophy that is given... ] |
|
I think that's what the coot meant by "participation trophy"....don't they have a jar of mayonnaise trophy somewhere.....?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3326]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [41]
TigerPulse: 100%
5
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
4
Dec 9, 2024, 10:02 AM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
genuine question. will the citrus bowl be south carolina's best bowl win? I think it may be better than the outback. From my knowledge citrus and the capital one are the same, but people will probably remember citrus for longer given the name that has been around since the '80s. I remember them going nuts for mayo a couple years back though, so that may be #1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [68630]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 90381
Joined: 2001
|
I wouldn't chalk that game up as a win for UofSC just yet...
4
Dec 9, 2024, 10:04 AM
|
|
until it is clear how many of their paid mercenaries opt-out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3729]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7562]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1857]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
3
Dec 9, 2024, 10:14 AM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
Clemson has 3!!! Clemson has a chance for 4 this year. How many do the ##### have now and what are ##### chances of adding 1 this year?? Even a simple minded #### can count to ZERO!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7411]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7411]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
|
4 out of 5 straight National Title games dude
3
Dec 9, 2024, 10:16 AM
|
|
let that sink in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48246]
TigerPulse: 77%
58
Posts: 35749
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48246]
TigerPulse: 77%
58
Posts: 35749
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3658]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17471]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 15405
Joined: 1999
|
Maybe he meant a national championship or a conference championship
3
Dec 9, 2024, 10:30 AM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
over a state championship.you wouldn’t know anything about either of those…or about a trophy. Couple of meaningless bowl game trophies, one SEC championship game participation trophy…that’s it. Do they dive trophies for division winners?
By the way, Clemson has now won a postseason game 14 straight years. SCAR can’t say that, and neither can anybody else…ever.
Enjoy that state championship…rent comes due next Thanksgiving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1141]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13940]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 12416
Joined: 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9836]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3641]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
2
Dec 9, 2024, 12:13 PM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
Four teams will lose in the first round. We may or may not be one of those teams, but we are in it and you can't win it if you ain't in it!
Food for thought: Clemson has won at least one post-season game(conference championship, bowl, CFP) every year for 14 straight years. Eat your heart out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16110]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 17606
Joined: 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28756]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 13324
Joined: 2014
|
Re: We celebrate with whomever wins the NC, because we are in the playoffs and thus
3
Dec 9, 2024, 12:37 PM
|
|
Are you saying it just means more? 😂😂
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28075]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 34099
Joined: 2009
|
It's gonna be a great experience and fun regardless
3
Dec 9, 2024, 12:36 PM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
a historic trip to Texas, first ever meeting with them. A chance to be part of the first ever 12 team playoff. ANOTHER playoff banner we get to put in Death Valley.
So yeah I would say it's a pretty cool deal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [51]
TigerPulse: 95%
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2039]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [306]
TigerPulse: 83%
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1932]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
1
Dec 10, 2024, 7:24 AM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
The ##### entire existence has been a series of participation trophies.
Trophy Case = bowl games + ACC Championship in the 1960s
2-8 vs Clemson last 10 years w two wins by total of 4 points.
I’m ok if next 10 years go like last 10.
Bottom line is your are #####.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50898]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 14929
Joined: 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2699]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9276]
TigerPulse: 75%
44
Posts: 19378
Joined: 2009
|
Cut your nails man!
1
1
Dec 10, 2024, 8:37 AM
|
|
Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2842]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1099]
TigerPulse: 78%
25
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
2
Dec 10, 2024, 8:26 AM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
Sir, Ma’am, whatever you are, please, do not speak to us as if your opinion holds any weight. Your little program has never accomplished ANYTHING. EVER. Never, ever. Other than the conference title in 1969, the ACC conference title. That’s right.
For you to speak to Clemson fans like you’re even worthy or breathing the same air as we do, is embarrassing for you, and your fan base.
You got by our least talented team in a decade and a half on busted plays. And poor decisions by our staff. Participation trophy? Maybe your program should actually partake in like, anything, ever, before you judge your masters.
COOT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12774]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12774]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8154]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2354]
TigerPulse: 96%
32
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
1
Dec 10, 2024, 7:52 PM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
It could be a participation trophy, but we do have one, how about USuCks?
championship?
Or at the end of the day will your playoff berth just be a participation trophy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4769]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [57525]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 44636
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5595]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11124]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13577
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [582]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [39456]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 22565
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
Honestly would have saved me a lot of heartache***
Dec 10, 2024, 10:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17360]
TigerPulse: 91%
51
Posts: 27489
Joined: 2003
|
You could always just leave and it would be the same as if you were never here***
Dec 16, 2024, 1:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9319]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 10859
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [100748]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98514
Joined: 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1261]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
1
Dec 11, 2024, 8:22 AM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
I mean…..considering that we’re a program that’s done it before….combined with a staff that pretty much all been there and players that are fully capable……yeah…..I’d say we’re as capable as any team in the field. We have as good of a chance as Oregon crappin the bed and 0 sec team’s winning it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17336]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13959]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
Dec 15, 2024, 7:31 PM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
It's just great Clemson is getting 6 million dollars and have a chance to win the game and go on for more. The nation will be watching. Basically nobody with be watching your game. South Carolina may never make a playoff game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [992]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19663]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14146
Joined: 2009
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
Dec 15, 2024, 7:58 PM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
Outside of beating us twice, this is Beamer's biggest accomplishment.
How does the mayo keep in the trophy case? If you can find it someone might wanna check on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2269]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
2
Dec 15, 2024, 7:59 PM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
I’m curious if you really think South Carolina will achieve half the success Clemson has had in your lifetime. Spoiler alert, you won’t. The school is a dump academically, it’s in a horrible part of the state, and you always been mediocre with the exception of about six years. And in those six years you didn’t even manage to win a conference title, and you got stomped when you attempted it, and then got stomped by FSU. You guys win 9 games and suddenly you’re about to storm the college football world. We win 9 and it’s a down season for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [596]
TigerPulse: 99%
20
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
Dec 16, 2024, 12:05 AM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
Stupid coot. It’s not about winning the championship.
We get paid $4 million being in first round and losing to usuck didn’t bleak the season even though it may seemed like it. If we don’t win we have 3 national championships already. I was at your little coliseum last week. Women’s basketball is the only thing worthy on display and who gives a cluck about women’s basketball. 😆
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6415]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national
Dec 29, 2024, 3:10 PM
[ in reply to I'm curious if you really think you're capable of winning a national ] |
|
Clemson will have another Natty before the SEC. All Dabo needs to get is a solid DC. The players are there. I guess you missed the memo about Clemson having the fifth best roster this season. Clemson was a run defense away from beating Texas. Did you see how Cade and the freshman receivers shredded the all world/SEC number one pass defense? Did you also notice how Clemson was not intimidated to play in that environment? Go back and tell your chicken friends that Clemson will win it all in 2025. You guys are pathetic. You guys cannot win your own conference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [32248]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18344
Joined: 2008
|
Re: South Carolina Loss
6
6
Dec 9, 2024, 9:45 AM
|
|
I think what really gets them is they didn't blow us out like they were saying they were going to....they barely squeaked by.....in fact, Cade should have put the game away because Williams was wide open in the end zone but he panicked and thew the pick towards Mafah.....it is what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [98638]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 47942
Joined: 2009
|
Cockle-Doo-Doo
5
5
Dec 9, 2024, 9:59 AM
|
|
To YOU!
C U from Texas chickens!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [449]
TigerPulse: 54%
17
|
Re: South Carolina Loss
5
5
Dec 9, 2024, 10:02 AM
|
|
A game that Clemson should have never lost, But it is what it is. In spite of most must think, Clemson doesn't belong, but they got in. USC probably had there best record under Shane Beamer. Enjoy it. We all know that the Gamecocks will never get this close to the Playoffs again, Just watch next year. Everything will fall apart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3729]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: South Carolina Loss
2
Dec 9, 2024, 10:12 AM
|
|
Coot curse coming there way! Its funny they never learn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1768]
TigerPulse: 57%
31
|
Re: South Carolina Loss
1
Dec 9, 2024, 1:14 PM
[ in reply to Re: South Carolina Loss ] |
|
What if they do? What if they reload and Shane has them competitive like this each year? The CFP is only likely going to expand. If they get in and the field expands to 20, it means NOTHING. We were in when it was FOUR. The FOUR best teams. they’ll NEVER have that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [595]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
The most ironic outcome is most likely
4
Dec 9, 2024, 10:08 AM
|
|
The most ironic outcome is most likely
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29303]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 22012
Joined: 2007
|
Re: The most ironic outcome is most likely
2
Dec 9, 2024, 11:03 AM
|
|
Hey '09. what kind of trophy did ya'll get ? Once again, nothing !!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59129]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 13961
Joined: 2018
|
Cool, congrats! Have fun in Shreveport or wherever.***
2
Dec 9, 2024, 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [68630]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 90381
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5183]
TigerPulse: 42%
38
Posts: 17168
Joined: 2005
|
Two out of the last Three***
1
Dec 9, 2024, 12:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28756]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 13324
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Two out of the last Three***
6
6
Dec 9, 2024, 12:38 PM
|
|
Also 2 out of the last 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [551]
TigerPulse: 99%
20
|
Re: Two out of the last Three***
Dec 15, 2024, 11:00 PM
[ in reply to Two out of the last Three*** ] |
|
All I can do is tip my hat and say you were the better team that day. Now if you want to compare trophy cases would like to have that conversation as well. Do you have one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [75]
TigerPulse: 100%
8
|
Re: The most ironic outcome is most likely
2
Dec 9, 2024, 12:02 PM
[ in reply to Re: The most ironic outcome is most likely ] |
|
Why is this dude even on here lmaooooo. The embarrassing part is you’re about 40 years old on your rivals website…get a life
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28756]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 13324
Joined: 2014
|
Re: The most ironic outcome is most likely
2
Dec 9, 2024, 12:40 PM
|
|
He’s really starting to sound like AFdog. Maybe a scock?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1768]
TigerPulse: 57%
31
|
Re: The most ironic outcome is most likely
2
1
Dec 9, 2024, 1:17 PM
|
|
Nah this dudes been around longer than AFDawg, didn’t AF’s wife get on here one time 😂?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6415]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17471]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 15405
Joined: 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1041]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [437]
TigerPulse: 98%
17
|
Re: South Carolina Loss
2
Dec 10, 2024, 8:23 AM
|
|
The lost cost us a bye and hosting a playoff game. I have to see Walmart coot gear being on full display being strutted around daily because we self-destructed and made their QB look like Superman and hear how they are ACC champions. Nothing funny at all IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69831]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 19500
Joined: 2008
|
If you get a bye, you don't get to host a playoff game
1
Dec 10, 2024, 8:08 PM
|
|
You go directly to the bowl games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12774]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: South Carolina Loss
1
Dec 10, 2024, 8:35 AM
|
|
I don’t really pay attention to South Carolina losses……I mean, who has that much time? We only live for 80 years or so. I also don’t go to the beach and attempt to count the grains of sand, for the same reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7411]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
|
it's still embarrassing to lose to South Carolina
Dec 15, 2024, 8:01 PM
|
|
at home
people need to be fired
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1768]
TigerPulse: 57%
31
|
Re: it's still embarrassing to lose to South Carolina
Dec 15, 2024, 11:18 PM
|
|
THIS. They’ve won more games in our stadium than their own in the past twenty years and that disgusts me to think about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1700]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Was this rivalry ever close??
Dec 29, 2024, 3:06 PM
|
|
I mean, they went decades without recording back to back wins against us until they won the 5 straight with Spurrier. To make it close in the next thirty years, they'll need a couple of 10 year win streaks just to get their winning % to 45%...
Seriously, '69 and '70 were the prior last back to back win years until 2008...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 135
| visibility 22400
|
|
|
50
