I’ve read Clemson’s complaint. I like that it is tactfully narrow—it doesn’t come across as an overreach in the arguments.
But one point made, that I haven’t seen anyone discussing or reporting on, is that it doesn’t only support outright leaving the conference as justification for filing. A declaration of Clemson’s rights, vis-a-vis the Grant of Rights, is also necessary for any chance of Clemson to stay in the conference and get a greater share of revenue distribution.
That’s probably not realistic given where things are headed in college athletics. But is important for framing Clemson’s case (and avoiding dismissal).
Good point. Even if we stay the ACC is going to have to negotiate a better monetary program for its members or they are going to make their members non competitive on sports.