|
Replies: 14
| visibility 2050
|
Rock Defender [65]
TigerPulse: 89%
7
|
QB Age vs. ESPN Ranking
23
23
Jan 2, 2024, 1:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Cade gets a lot of heat on this board, so I put together this chart. Notice that he is the 2nd youngest QB of a top-25 team. I remember the golden age of college football where you could not buy quarterbacks. You had to wait every three to four years for your QB to mature to have a good team. TL16 spoiled us a bit winning a natty as a freshman. Even DW4 was a junior (21.3 years old) when he won a natty. Who knows if Cade will bring us back to the promise land, but at least give the young man some time.
P.S. Ole Miss, Penn State, and Clemson should be really good next year.
|
|
|
|
 |
Top TigerNet [31083]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
Solid First Post!
5
5
Jan 2, 2024, 1:32 PM
|
|
Thanks for your work!
Keep posting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6371]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: QB Age vs. ESPN Ranking
2
Jan 2, 2024, 1:40 PM
|
|
Good post, interesting and encouraging. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [96660]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 47368
Joined: 2009
|
Thx EarleHall for enlightening stats & post.
3
Jan 2, 2024, 2:00 PM
|
|
Please post more so I can post less..a lot less!
Go Tigers & CADE!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1622]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: QB Age vs. ESPN Ranking
3
Jan 2, 2024, 2:19 PM
|
|
Cool chart. NC State must be referring to Mj Morris (if that’s his name) since Brennan Armstrong is probably 24 or so. Their QB next year will probably be old as well (Greyson McCall).
Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9767]
TigerPulse: 55%
44
Posts: 12840
Joined: 2006
|
Re: QB Age vs. ESPN Ranking
1
2
Jan 2, 2024, 2:33 PM
|
|
I already knew this, but what was confirmed yesterday by watching the semi final games is that the team with the best offensive has a great chance to win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10185]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Excellent chart
3
Jan 2, 2024, 2:36 PM
|
|
Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10313]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: QB Age vs. ESPN Ranking
4
Jan 2, 2024, 2:36 PM
|
|
I said last night in another thread that these good QBs like Nix, Penix are 6th yr guys. Give Cade 3 more yrs and see if he isn't a lot more mature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [118]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: QB Age vs. ESPN Ranking
2
Jan 2, 2024, 2:39 PM
|
|
Assuming you used De Laura over Fifita (20 now) for Arizona, but that’s another team that will be dangerous next year. The one that really stuck out to me was Dart at Ole Miss. feel like he’s been around for 5 years but nope, not even 21 yet. Cool stuff, thanks for posting
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [99517]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 29667
Joined: 2005
|
Nice first post...
7
7
Jan 2, 2024, 2:56 PM
|
|
coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [65]
TigerPulse: 89%
7
|
Re: Nice first post...
7
7
Jan 2, 2024, 3:04 PM
|
|
My first “coot” reply. Thanks! Must be a good post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [96660]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 47368
Joined: 2009
|
hey EarleHall,,where did you find your cute Tiger profile pic?
1
Jan 2, 2024, 4:24 PM
|
|
…with him holding his nose? What’s the history of it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [65]
TigerPulse: 89%
7
|
Re: hey EarleHall,,where did you find your cute Tiger profile pic?
1
Jan 2, 2024, 5:13 PM
|
|
It’s an old “beer club” sticker back from the early days of DIY home brewing. Ca 1987.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5684]
TigerPulse: 96%
39
|
I think when Luke fixes the O-Line this offseason
1
Jan 2, 2024, 4:33 PM
|
|
Cade will be a superstar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78863]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 36475
Joined: 2003
|
So, the TOP EIGHT GUYS on the board are all beyond the age when they would be
1
Jan 2, 2024, 5:07 PM
|
|
out of eligibility in a "natural" progression?
And Cade is 2nd youngest on the board?
In-Lightning, to say the least.
No, I read it wrong. But, if I read it RIGHT, now, they have McCarthy from Meechigan ahead of Penix, Jr. from Washington? No need to read any further if that's the case. That must be TEAM rankings, which don't mean Diddly when it comes to QB talent.
Message was edited by: 76er®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 2050
|
|
|
50
