|
Replies: 31
| visibility 860
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45379
Joined: 2012
|
New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 8:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Playmaker [380]
TigerPulse: 100%
16
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 9:04 AM
|
|
Why do people even care about these clowns? I wish I had a job where I got to speculate all year about a single weekend, make predictions that are usually way off, correct myself after the event, and get a big fat salary to boot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18535]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11849
Joined: 2001
|
Draft hacks = TV weather folks
Apr 22, 2017, 10:51 AM
|
|
No accountability, but still get paid. Just have to be somewhat photogenic and get along good at school visits. Why do we never see film of kiper and mcshay when they visit schools?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19888]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18110
Joined: 2012
|
Why do they need to be accountable?
Apr 22, 2017, 12:10 PM
|
|
They have opinions just like everyone else. Their opinions are for entertainment purposes only. What is so hard for people to understand?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [554]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 24, 2017, 9:50 AM
[ in reply to Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant" ] |
|
Kiper and McShay get their info from talking to "sources" in the NFL, and closely associated to the NFL. Do you really think a GM would give them specific/accurate grades they have on players? They are always playing games with who they like, flase information, even avoiding inverviews with players they have highest on their boards.
Tom Brady was panned as slow & average arm. If you went back and watched his film, he had the ability to play best in crunch time.
That's the thing you can't teach. How do they handle pressure.
How is it that Tribusky gets a pass for not bringing his team back to beat Stanford, but Watson's two games against Bama don't matter?
SMH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 9:05 AM
|
|
I can't stand the NFL Draft drivel that spews every year from the after the Super Bowl - the Draft.
Deshaun would have to tune that rubbish out.
It's annoying to the point it causes me to not be interested in the least bit. Mel looks like some used car salesman from some deserted western town about 1979 and the sight of McShay is not any better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26697]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 46372
Joined: 2010
|
Your Kiper description is 'spot on'... knew several in '76.***
Apr 22, 2017, 11:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [55318]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 21540
Joined: 2014
|
Who is that sexy beast standing behind Watson in the pic?
Apr 22, 2017, 9:07 AM
|
|
Asking for a fiend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [79]
TigerPulse: 100%
8
|
Re: Who is that sexy beast standing behind Watson in the pic?
Apr 23, 2017, 9:31 AM
|
|
You mean the one who looks like he just farted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [830]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 9:08 AM
|
|
Amen to that brother!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60123]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 61436
Joined: 2007
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 9:23 AM
|
|
Well it makes me even more proud of our National Champion QB to hear him say that people like McShay and Kiper are "IRRELEVANT" when it comes to what ever they have to say about him. DW4 gets it!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2238]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 9:26 AM
|
|
I totally agree with Deshaun. It just their opinion and I wouldn't put to much stock into it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [16050]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
|
Misleading headline.
Apr 22, 2017, 9:36 AM
|
|
I love his moxy though
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
Bad headline. It takes it out of context and makes...
Apr 22, 2017, 9:40 AM
|
|
him sound bitter. He is just saying it doesn't matter in the end what people say. He is not saying that they are personally irrelevant. He is talking big picture and what he does in the NFL. That title is kind of a little dig on Watson's attitude, but that title is misleading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [40675]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 18513
Joined: 2015
|
Exactly***
Apr 22, 2017, 10:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1109]
TigerPulse: 94%
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1116]
TigerPulse: 99%
26
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 10:02 AM
|
|
Ask THE NFL GM'S what they think about Kiper and McShay, especially Bill Polian, lol !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18535]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11849
Joined: 2001
|
Exactly. If they were any good they would work for a NFL
Apr 22, 2017, 10:54 AM
|
|
team!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48079]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 49059
Joined: 2004
|
The NFL wouldn't pay enough. He gets paid more at ESPN.
Apr 22, 2017, 11:22 AM
|
|
It's not like an NFL scout would make more than he does at ESPN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12590]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 10:27 AM
|
|
Kiper & McShay are idiots. I keep reading reports of comparisons between Mariota and Watson. 100% of the time those reports keep referring to Mariota as the more accurate passer. Ehhhhhhhh......that depends on what you are looking at. Mariota played at Oregon in 2112, 2013, 2014. Mariota's completion % for those respective years was 68.5, 63.5 & 68.3. For his career it's 66.4%.
Watson's stats were 67.9, 67.8, 67.0 for his 3 years. For his career he was 67.4%. SO WHO'S THE MORE ACCURATE PASSER?????
The other issue that I have never heard mentioned by anyone is, who was the competition that these stats were accumulated against? Go look up Defensive stats for 2012, 2013 & 2014. What you will find is that PAC 12 defense is rated roughly the same as a 1st grader's brownie troupe. Stanford played D, but after that it was tiptoe through the tulips with bonbons and a glass of Chardonnay.
I say again, Kiper & McShay are idiots
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18535]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 11849
Joined: 2001
|
+1 for bonbons!***
Apr 22, 2017, 10:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [645]
TigerPulse: 95%
21
|
Re: +1 for bonbons!***
Apr 22, 2017, 1:53 PM
|
|
Yes yes bonbons +1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [482]
TigerPulse: 100%
18
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 12:14 PM
|
|
Great article. DW knows who he is and what he is capable of. McShay and Kiper are nothing but over paid ESPN windbags. It amazes me how they are considered experts when neither one has played a down in College Football or the NFL that I'm aware of. GO DW and good luck in the NFL Draft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [482]
TigerPulse: 100%
18
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 12:15 PM
|
|
Great article. DW knows who he is and what he is capable of. McShay and Kiper are nothing but over paid ESPN windbags. It amazes me how they are considered experts when neither one has played a down in College Football or the NFL that I'm aware of. GO DW and good luck in the NFL Draft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [482]
TigerPulse: 100%
18
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 12:15 PM
|
|
Great article. DW knows who he is and what he is capable of. McShay and Kiper are nothing but over paid ESPN windbags. It amazes me how they are considered experts when neither one has played a down in College Football or the NFL that I'm aware of. GO DW and good luck in the NFL Draft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19888]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18110
Joined: 2012
|
Nice click bait headline
Apr 22, 2017, 12:15 PM
|
|
Not exactly what DW said. I hope this was from Crump's editorial authority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [482]
TigerPulse: 100%
18
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 12:15 PM
|
|
Great article. DW knows who he is and what he is capable of. McShay and Kiper are nothing but over paid ESPN windbags. It amazes me how they are considered experts when neither one has played a down in College Football or the NFL that I'm aware of. GO DW and good luck in the NFL Draft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7219]
TigerPulse: 70%
42
Posts: 20390
Joined: 2006
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 22, 2017, 12:43 PM
|
|
"Irrelevant".That's blasphemy,like calling the kettle black.
We all Kiper,and McShay are on the top of their picks,just like Lee Corso.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [446]
TigerPulse: 78%
17
|
Disappointed in the headline.***
Apr 22, 2017, 4:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [42]
TigerPulse: 43%
5
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 23, 2017, 10:07 AM
|
|
Not what Watson said. Come on guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [10]
TigerPulse: 100%
2
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 24, 2017, 10:50 AM
|
|
It doesn't matter where Watson goes or when he goes all I know is whatever team he's on that team is going to be a darn good one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11658]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 14278
Joined: 2014
|
Re: New Story: Watson says draft experts like Kiper and McShay are "irrelevant"
Apr 24, 2017, 5:19 PM
|
|
I concur. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 31
| visibility 860
|
|
|
50
