|
Replies: 37
| visibility 4822
|
Clemson Conqueror [11133]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 11117
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
 |
National Champion [8062]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
6
6
Jan 17, 2025, 7:14 PM
|
|
Just when you think things can’t get dumber…the NCAA says hold my beer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62729]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 12284
Joined: 2019
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
5
5
Jan 17, 2025, 8:47 PM
|
|
Between the NCAA and the government, college sports don’t stand a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [25370]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 18433
Joined: 2000
|
NCAA should give itself the 'Death Penalty'
Jan 18, 2025, 4:05 AM
|
|
...for Lack Of Institutional Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [33599]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 17109
Joined: 2008
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
5
5
Jan 17, 2025, 7:16 PM
|
|
So, the transfer portal can be ignored and a player can say to coach on Moday,
Adios, I'm transferring to XYZ university and can sMonday, and play for XYZ UNIV. on Saturday?
THE NCAA IS A CLOWN SHOW. THE SOONER ALL CONFERENCES SAY GOODBYE AND FORM A NEW OVERSIGHT LEAGUE WITH A COMMISSIONER, THE BETTER FOR COLLEGE SPORTS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7398]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 18, 2025, 1:03 PM
|
|
No. You can enroll at a school in the middle of a semester.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7398]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 18, 2025, 1:03 PM
|
|
*can’t
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Just when you think that the NCAA couldn't be more stupid...
1
Jan 17, 2025, 7:18 PM
|
|
The out do themselves. What a circus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12212]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Just when you think that the NCAA couldn't be more stupid...
2
Jan 17, 2025, 7:57 PM
|
|
Wow, never thought you would badmouth decisions that make the NCAA and Free-Market players look bad.
If this is factual, this whole college thing has become a sham and they can let it rot!i honestly don't need it or the lack of control that dismantled a great sport!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
It's just one more way the NCAA got exposed
Jan 17, 2025, 11:45 PM
|
|
For stupid, unenforceable rules.
They lose every time someone has the cojones to challenge them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [999]
TigerPulse: 93%
24
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
1
Jan 17, 2025, 7:21 PM
|
|
they will be forced to do something in regards to this very quickly, because that also means there is no " portal window" its just 365 any day any time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [61286]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62029
Joined: 2007
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 17, 2025, 7:44 PM
|
|
Colleges across the entire country has got to at some point threaten throw a wheelbarrow of bricks in the spokes of the kids now rule their own choice of school whenever they want to. They just have threaten to kick college sports off their campuses, and that will slow their role...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11106]
TigerPulse: 98%
46
Posts: 13418
Joined: 2021
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
2
Jan 17, 2025, 7:56 PM
|
|
Colleges cannot institute a limitation tegarding acceptance of transfers for student athletes that differ from the school’s transfer rules for non-student athletes.
Period.
Anything else is discriminatory, and thus not legal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1172]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
1
Jan 17, 2025, 8:16 PM
|
|
Then add languages to the NIL deals unilaterally that says that the student forfeits any money and pays a percentage of the money already paid if they leave the university. Then like any other student, if you owe a debt to the university, they will not send transcripts. No transcript, no entry anywhere. All schools would have to do it, but it would stop the transfer madness I think. Should fall maybe under contract law?
chemist, not a lawyer... lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
That's illegal in st least 2 counts.
Jan 18, 2025, 1:06 PM
|
|
1. A school can't withhold transcripts based on a private NIL deal. No revenue sharing yet, so no school money is inv
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Involved.
Jan 18, 2025, 1:16 PM
|
|
2. NIL deals can't be directly tied to a specific school, according to one of the few surviving NCAA rules about transfers. Ergo, that also prevents the school from withholding transcripts.
Revenue sharing is likely going to be delayed due to both the DofEd Title IX issue, and the DoJ memo that the House case settlement is problematic due to the issues with the NIL clause and giving a third part the right to interfere with NIL deals.
The DoJ memo basically says that under current law, the NIL clause in the House case settlement is illegal, because it gives a third party (the NCAA) the right to regulate and interfere with private NIL deals to which they are not a party.
Gonna be a looooong summer while this gets sorted out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28890]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
Does a student who transfers into a university...
Jan 18, 2025, 12:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS ] |
|
.... have the legal right to play football for that university?
Right now, we are acting like they do.
If Big Tech U wouldn't let Moose Morgan play football, then Moose wouldn't be so quick to transfer to Big Tech U.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Yes, they do.
Jan 18, 2025, 1:04 PM
|
|
Preventing it is a third (or 4th) party interference in the athletes right to make money.
That is a clear Sherman Antitrust Act violation.
If the transfer crosses state lines, it also violates true interstate Commerce Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
The NCAA did all that hand wringing about transfer windows...
Jan 18, 2025, 4:00 AM
[ in reply to Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS ] |
|
When they didn't have a rule that required athlete transfers to actually use said portal???
No wonder those idiots keep losing court cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [108]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
1
Jan 17, 2025, 7:51 PM
|
|
You can’t just enroll at a University mid-semester.
The NCAA were fools from the beginning for not tying athletic participation more directly to athletic eligibility. They could have just said you have to complete two semesters in good standing at a school before becoming athletically eligible. Period.
Would have made it much harder for the courts to interfere because they would have a hard time justifying their jurisdiction. They should leave academic matters up to the schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
They can't discriminate against athletes...
1
Jan 18, 2025, 3:56 AM
|
|
The have to treat them the same as other students, academically speaking.
The courts would be all over this, just like in the Ohio case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [108]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
1
Jan 17, 2025, 7:51 PM
|
|
You can’t just enroll at a University mid-semester.
The NCAA were fools from the beginning for not tying athletic participation more directly to athletic eligibility. They could have just said you have to complete two semesters in good standing at a school before becoming athletically eligible. Period.
Would have made it much harder for the courts to interfere because they would have a hard time justifying their jurisdiction. They should leave academic matters up to the schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6999]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 17, 2025, 8:15 PM
|
|
Until these athletes are unionized and engaging in collective bargaining the NCAA will be toothless and its gonna be the wild wild west. The courts have made it clear they will accept nothing less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13862]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 13153
Joined: 2001
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 17, 2025, 9:06 PM
|
|
Disgusting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22555]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 13326
Joined: 2018
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
1
Jan 17, 2025, 9:14 PM
|
|
Based on this, I guess all of the supposed tampering rules just went out the window with it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1340]
TigerPulse: 92%
28
|
It's all garbage.***
Jan 17, 2025, 9:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7853]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
The tinfoil hat wearing consipracy theorist of the past 30 years were right!
1
Jan 17, 2025, 10:37 PM
|
|
NCAA, All Media Powers That Be have been taken over by those who suffered atomic wedgies, stood up on prom night, and stuffed into lockers. 'THEY' have gotten 'THEIR' revenge!!
We Are *******!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [819]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
1
Jan 17, 2025, 11:15 PM
|
|
So if it’s the first game and early enough in the semester, could a player actually transfer during halftime?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5069]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 18, 2025, 8:47 AM
|
|
Of course, every time the NCAA tries to enforce a rule, someone runs to court and the courts say "Nope, you can't limit that."
At some point, someone will sue to get 4 strikes in baseball and make tackling in football illegal and courts will say "Well, your rules are arbitrary, capricious and discriminatory, so you will not be allowed to make or enforce those rules anymore."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Very unlikely.
Jan 18, 2025, 10:13 AM
|
|
There's a big difference between in field/on court competition management, which is purely athletic, and transfer rules, which include academics.
Ditto for the differences between competition management and NIL.
Another ditto for the difference between competition management and not counting non NCAA junior college against NCAA eligibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1197]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 18, 2025, 10:31 AM
|
|
Nothing shocks me anymore in college sports. Its become the wild west X1000!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6968]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 18, 2025, 11:13 AM
|
|
Coach calls - "We are upping our offer of NIL, but you have to hurry. The last day for drop - add is tomorrow."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6428]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 18, 2025, 11:22 AM
|
|
Is the release of the transcript tied to being successfully entered into the portal?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6428]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: NCAA ruling proves the Transfer Portal is completely BS
Jan 18, 2025, 12:52 PM
|
|
I bet that Wisconsin is going to go to court over Xavier Lucas. He supposedly signed the B1G boilerplate form for revenue sharing that should be an enforceable contract. Grab your popcorn…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [102]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
I wouldn't count on it.
Jan 18, 2025, 1:00 PM
|
|
There has been no revenue sharing.
No revenue sharing means that there's nothing Wisconsin can hold him to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28890]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
|
As long as their is no penalty to the school signing....
Jan 18, 2025, 11:57 AM
|
|
....the transfer player, then schools will continue to sign the player.
If no one would sign the player, the player would be far less likely to leave.
Example of a rule that could work. (I'm not suggesting it is the best rule or even a good rule. Just giving it as an example.)
When a player is signed to a school he counts as a scholarship for that school (1 of the 105 allocated) for the next 5 years.
That would discourage a school from signing a player who only has 1 or 2 years of eligibility left, don't you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 37
| visibility 4822
|
|
|
50
