Re: Name the 3 best teams TX beat.

Because it’s Clemson. It’s not about Texas. It’s never really about Clemson’s opponent. It’s about these clown ### coaches that we have getting the team ready to play, and if the team is ready to play, then they have to rely on those coaches to call plays aggressively that allow them to play the game of football aggressively. I know I’m breaking this down like a kindergartener but it really is just that simple….. if we are throwing all over Texas do we continue to do it? If we are running all over Texas do we continue to do it?
If West Goodwin’s plan is working will he stick to it or will he make adjustments before Texas makes adjustments? You just can’t trust this incompetent coaches to allow the players to go ball the heck out. They handcuff the players.

They are the only reason we lost to South Carolina

RememberTheDanny

Clemson Conqueror [11106]

TigerPulse: 98%

Posts: 13418

Joined: 2021

Re: You're a joke

Dec 12, 2024, 6:08 PM

We lost to S.Carolina in large part because we could not tackle LaNorris Sellers. In hindsight, now that I’ve become less emotional about our loss and hav8ng taken the time to watch full-game replays twice, our overall defense was terrific. We were in better position to tackle Sellers than any team, but we didn’t get it done. Because Sellers is Cam Newton-esque as far as a running QB. Sellers is not as fast as Bama’s Milroe, but he’s shiftier and harder to bring down than Milroe. That’s saying a lot.

LSU couldn’t stop Sellers, either; their bacon was saved when Sellers went out with an injury. TX A&M couldn’t tackle Sellers. Alabama struggled to tackle him; Bama and Clemson did comparable work as far as minimizing S.Carolina’s offensive output.

Despite the tackling problem, which doesn’t merit belaboring any more than what I’ve stated above, there were three other factors … all on offense … that kept us from winning. Two involved eminently easy (athletically) accomplishments that we failed to e r Ute and one involved an eminently easy (decision choice) in which we made the wrong decision.

The missed pass to Wesco on the slant route deep in our territory. Not a hard throw to make, but CK2 missed it. Had he hit it, Wesco had nothing but green grass between him and the end zone. I’m not blaming this in CK2. Even great QBs miss easy throws. But we cannot blame the coaches for this perfect and aggressive play call not bearing fruit.

The end of game INT by CK2 was a terrible throw on a super easy pass. If it was a DJU-esque pass that got thrown into the dirt, then we kick a short FG and tie the game. If the throw was good and Mafah caught it, he’d have been tackled easily and we call TO, followed by the game tying FG. Either way, it’s OT.

The bad decision was from Mafah on that end around when he tried to make that lateral after he was on the ground and the play should have rightfully been called dead. Just eat the ball, Mafah. Don’t try to be the hero and attempt something that risky.

None of this is related to ‘bad coaching.’

So … plenty of what you stated is wrong.

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Name the 3 best teams TX beat.

Michigan beat Alabama this year. Er. Calendar year.***

A far different Michigan***

You're a joke

Re: You're a joke

LOL, forgot about that guy. You're probably correct.***

Re: You're a joke

Re: You're a joke

DABO IS GONNA SPIT HIS TEA OUT WHEN HE SEES YOUR NAME!!!!***

the INT on the last drive didn't help the cause ... but you were on a roll