|
Replies: 24
| visibility 276
|
CU Guru [1544]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:12 PM
|
|
That home run gives them a extra run because of that bs call.
F this bs
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:14 PM
|
|
That was literally a text book interference call. It was as easy as it gets for the umps.
Do you understand why it was interference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2419]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:17 PM
|
|
Even if the tag is applied before the interference happens? I mean the tag got him 2 feet before he got to the bag. That's still the right call? (And I'm listening with an open mind)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:19 PM
|
|
Wright was blocking the bag before he caught the ball and we’ll before the tag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [71855]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1544]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2964]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:24 PM
|
|
He’s mad it’s no longer it’s woman basketball season anymore. They got beat by Kentucky today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1125]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:31 PM
|
|
Not sure I understand either, interference (or obstruction?) is called if you don’t have the ball. Clemson had the ball at 2B before any contact.
With the logic from this call if a defender has the ball in the base line in a run down and the base runner tries to run or slide through him he should be safe?
Any umps in the house care to explain??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1125]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:31 PM
[ in reply to Re: MF bull shiiitty ] |
|
Not sure I understand either, interference (or obstruction?) is called if you don’t have the ball. Clemson had the ball at 2B before any contact.
With the logic from this call if a defender has the ball in the base line in a run down and the base runner tries to run or slide through him he should be safe?
Any umps in the house care to explain??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:38 PM
|
|
Wright was blocking the bag before he had the ball. Once you have the ball all bets are off when it comes to interference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15985]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 10152
Joined: 2016
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 16, 2022, 7:42 AM
[ in reply to Re: MF bull shiiitty ] |
|
If you're driving and a tree is across the road ahead of you but it never interferes with your journey because you run into a ditch before you get to it, then that tree is not an obstruction/blockage for you.
If you're running to 2nd base and no fielder obstructs/blocks the base path causing you to change directions but tags you out before you ever get to the bag where he's standing, you didn't get obstructed/blocked.
Just the way I see it. He was out well before his lead hand came close to the fielders foot at 2nd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:30 PM
[ in reply to Re: MF bull shiiitty ] |
|
Lol. Sorry I brought logic into the conversation. Continue to be emotional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5081]
TigerPulse: 88%
37
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: MF bull shiiitty ] |
|
Bro…interference for a running sliding into 2B hasn’t been called since the introduction of the raw hide mitt. Foh little leaguer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:29 PM
|
|
Lol.
It was literally called against UVA in game 1, which gave us a run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5081]
TigerPulse: 88%
37
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:32 PM
|
|
Yes..going into home plate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:36 PM
|
|
My bad, I missed you specifically saying 2b.
Either way, even if it’s rarely called, when it’s as clear as it was and the opposing coach sees it and challenges it, we can’t get mad when the umps make the correct call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2964]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:39 PM
[ in reply to Re: MF bull shiiitty ] |
|
You are trying to argue with someone who finger paints for a living.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:44 PM
|
|
Yeah but I’m really good at it.
I guess you don’t actually have a response to the topic at hand? Would you care to tell me why the ump was wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2964]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:45 PM
|
|
I bet you are good at it! Years of practice you should be good at it. Just don’t get any paint on your helmet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:48 PM
|
|
Shocker. No response on why the ump was wrong, because it was an easy call. But continue being emotional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2964]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:48 PM
|
|
Whatever you say slowleak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2419]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:48 PM
[ in reply to Re: MF bull shiiitty ] |
|
I guess my thought was when the tag was applied. It was before the runner got interfered with. He was tagged 2-3 feet away from the bag so the interference didnt really come in to the play.. the play was over by the time he got to the spot where the defender was in the way.
The rule may not be written that way but that was the problem I had with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2723]
TigerPulse: 77%
33
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 10:53 PM
|
|
That’s not how it happened, the tag came well after the Interference. I wish I could rewind the live broadcast on the ACC network and post a pic of the play.
When the runner went into his slide, Wright was blocking the bag before he caught the ball. This keeps the runner from having a path to the base to slide around the tag. Wright was basically right in front of the bag when he caught the ball, cutting off the lane to the bag. If Wright had caught the ball THEN cut off the lane it wouldn’t have been interference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2419]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 15, 2022, 11:07 PM
|
|
Ok.. I can listen to that pov of it. To me it looked like the tag got him, then Wright's foot was blocking the bag but the tag was on before the runner got to his foot. If the timing was more like you said then I see more of the Int call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1125]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: MF bull shiiitty
May 16, 2022, 7:04 AM
|
|
Clemson had the ball before ANY contact with the runner.
It makes you wonder if they even looked at that.
The runner was absolutely hosed, only thing I can see is if he starts his slide before he has the ball…because again when contact was made Clemson clearly had the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 24
| visibility 276
|
|
|
50
