|
Replies: 19
| visibility 4
|
Starter [390]
TigerPulse: 91%
16
|
Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 2:08 PM
|
|
Why is no one else recruiting this guy? (Per the recent TNet article).
Too late in the game once he decooted, most top schools are full at his position?
Anyone with any insight there?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14655]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23147
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 2:12 PM
|
|
so texas and lsu are no one huh. who knew
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20376]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17158
Joined: 2002
|
In his defense, Hood's recent article did make it sound as
Jan 12, 2015, 2:15 PM
|
|
if LSU and UT have pulled back from the all-out press.
They probably have written Fields off as a long-shot and moved onto concentrating on others in the last 21 days of the recruitng calendar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4098]
TigerPulse: 94%
35
Posts: 10336
Joined: 1997
|
Re: In his defense, Hood's recent article did make it sound as
Jan 12, 2015, 2:20 PM
|
|
agree!! and it is not like they HAVE to get him to keep him from playing against them..now if he was going to Auburn or Ok they would be all out !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [390]
TigerPulse: 91%
16
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 2:44 PM
[ in reply to Re: Mark Fields ] |
|
Thanks for the polite response from a fellow tiger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21196]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 10193
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 4:59 PM
|
|
Don't pay attention to deroberts...he's the bitter old man of TNet. It's sad actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14655]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23147
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 5:01 PM
|
|
lol because i asked if texas and lsu were nobody, i am bitter. rotflmfao
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21196]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 10193
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 5:07 PM
|
|
no, because everything you post is negative and "smfh" at something...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5153]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
I see you didn't object to the 'old man' part -
Jan 12, 2015, 6:43 PM
[ in reply to Re: Mark Fields ] |
|
given you heck coach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [93]
TigerPulse: 85%
10
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 6:39 PM
[ in reply to Re: Mark Fields ] |
|
Does he commit on NSD or before?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2165]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
They know its a lost cause and that he is CU bound...***
Jan 12, 2015, 2:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1330]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 2:16 PM
|
|
Inefficient allocation of resources. Don't want to waste time, money, and effort on a guy most everyone believes is going to Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Steep hill to climb for other schools***
Jan 12, 2015, 2:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [725]
TigerPulse: 99%
22
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 2:51 PM
|
|
It seems that Fields already has an idea as to where he wants to go. Hopefully that has a lot to do with it. This class is a really great group of elite prospects. The '16 class has already gotten off to a great start and it's only going to get better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4506]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 2:54 PM
|
|
A lot of schools don't like to waste their time, effort and money(travel expenses) on a kid they feel they really have no shot at. Texas and LSU are just taking a shot in the dark and in desperate need of a big time DB. Fields sounds almost certain he will be Clemson bound and is almost just taking those visits like its a free vacation. But this late in the game, most schools know if they really have a shot or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1906]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 5:06 PM
|
|
You guys seem convinced our coaches want him. He is talented but is he a Clemson type of guy? Is there anyone else that we might rather have?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 6:34 PM
|
|
He's wanted. But I don't think the coaches wait around for him to commit if he starts flirting with other options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11337]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Mark Fields
Jan 12, 2015, 6:49 PM
|
|
because LSU was his dream offer and he isn't even listed them in the top 2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14987]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Mark Fields is a Tiger.***
Jan 19, 2015, 11:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [73]
TigerPulse: 90%
8
|
Re: Mark Fields is a Tiger.***
Jan 19, 2015, 11:52 PM
|
|
Welcome home fields. Get ready for DB U! Great addition to our class!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 4
|
|
|
50
