|
Replies: 34
| visibility 5034
|
Game Changer [1940]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
Josh Pate Final Top 25
3
9
9
Jan 21, 2025, 11:01 PM
|
|
|
|
Here’s Josh Pate aka Pate State’s final top 25. Tigers come in at 11, finishing in the top 12 which is nice to see. Also we’re ahead of SMU which we should be.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2193]
TigerPulse: 93%
32
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
3
Jan 21, 2025, 11:15 PM
|
|
Who?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19799]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
4
Jan 21, 2025, 11:24 PM
|
|
You are so transparent coot. We know you posted this to show coots ahead of Clemson. TD!
You coots are so desperate for someone to say coots are somehow better than Clemson, it would be sad if not so pathetic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [170]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
5
5
Jan 22, 2025, 7:46 AM
|
|
Coots will laminate a copy and put in their trophy case! Help fill the empty space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1138]
TigerPulse: 97%
26
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
Jan 22, 2025, 9:42 AM
|
|
Awe come on guys. Give these Coots a break. They finally had a half way decent season. Let them enjoy it. After all it might be another 25 years before they it happens again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1940]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
1
Jan 22, 2025, 10:46 AM
[ in reply to Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25 ] |
|
Literally did not. Couldn’t care less, we had a better season than them anyways. Illinois should be on this list and ranked ahead of the coots. Pate seems to have a love fest for the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60328]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 17752
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
3
1
Jan 21, 2025, 11:31 PM
|
|
He's usually spot on and very high on Clemson. I have no problem with scar being 1 ahead of us. They beat us. He did a segment on the bowls and talked about how he didn't consider those, other than playoff teams because you have a new roster, transfers etc. He'll have us top 5 opening the season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19799]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
1
Jan 21, 2025, 11:35 PM
|
|
Of course you are okay with coots ahead of Clemson. Coots lost to Illinois in the bowl game but ignoring that is fine. Okay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1711]
TigerPulse: 88%
31
|
Bowl games don't necessarily matter to the teams involved..
1
Jan 21, 2025, 11:57 PM
|
|
a growing trend for nearly a decade that cannot be ignored-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
Maybe some teans some of the time, but do you think uSC wanted to win?***
1
1
Jan 21, 2025, 11:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60328]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 17752
Joined: 2020
|
Re: Maybe some teans some of the time, but do you think uSC wanted to win?***
Jan 22, 2025, 8:08 AM
|
|
Sure they wanted to win. All Bowl teams want to win, but as the other poster said, bowls are meaningless anymore. They're more about building for the next year. That's kinda what pate was saying. So he said he based his rankings on the season said team had.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
So if they wanted to be there and win, whats the issue?
1
Jan 22, 2025, 11:46 AM
|
|
Bowl games should absolutely count in rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1940]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
1
Jan 22, 2025, 10:47 AM
[ in reply to Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25 ] |
|
Well the question to ask then is do these rankings count the bowl games then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
The coots did not have a better season than Clemson.
1
1
Jan 21, 2025, 11:53 PM
[ in reply to Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25 ] |
|
It’s not 100% about head to head. We won 10 games, a conference championship, and we made the 12 team playoff and represented fairly well. The coots didn’t get in the playoffs nor did they deserve to.
The head to head doesn’t fill the void they have in the overall season. They should not be ranked ahead of us in any poll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1711]
TigerPulse: 88%
31
|
If it were a game played earlier in the season then you might have a point...
2
Jan 22, 2025, 12:00 AM
|
|
but not the final game of the regular season..c'mon Bowlhunter-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
Final rankings are based on the seasons body of work.
1
Jan 22, 2025, 12:08 AM
|
|
It doesn’t matter of it was the final game of the season. Rankings are based on a body of work. We won the conference championship and had a good showing against Texas in spite of the rushing yards we gave up. The coots lost to Illinois in a game they wanted very much to win. Combined with their losses in the regular season, their body of work was as good as Clemson’s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
*not as good***
1
Jan 22, 2025, 12:10 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [90]
TigerPulse: 55%
10
|
Re: Final rankings are based on the seasons body of work.
1
4
Jan 22, 2025, 6:22 AM
[ in reply to Final rankings are based on the seasons body of work. ] |
|
You lost fair and square in the final game of the regular season to South Carolina. This was considered a must-win, basically a playoff game.
Everyone thought the season was over after Clemson lost that “must-win” game to USC. Then, somehow Clemson backdoored their way into the playoffs with 3 losses (desperately needed Miami to blow a 21! point lead to Syracuse.)
You played a group of 5 school in the ACC championship and needed a last second, 50+ yard field goal to win. The same ACC that went 2-12 in the post season. That’s why the final ranking is behind South Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24907]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
|
Re: Final rankings are based on the seasons body of work.
1
Jan 22, 2025, 9:54 AM
|
|
Your opinion does not matter coot!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [193]
TigerPulse: 100%
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1940]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [10016]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [70668]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 42830
Joined: 2004
|
LOL, coot.***
6
6
Jan 21, 2025, 11:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [405]
TigerPulse: 49%
17
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
5
5
Jan 21, 2025, 11:35 PM
|
|
Bama over Tenn is a joke. Tenn had the better record, beat both Okl & Vandy (who both beat Bama), and oh yeah they beat Bama head-to-head. Pate is a clown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3495]
TigerPulse: 92%
34
|
Pate is a clown. Exactly.***
1
3
Jan 21, 2025, 11:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24023]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 14333
Joined: 2013
|
Guess Illinois does not exist?
3
Jan 22, 2025, 12:10 AM
[ in reply to Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25 ] |
|
And the hard on for Ole Miss is beyond ridiculous.
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [405]
TigerPulse: 49%
17
|
Re: Guess Illinois does not exist?
Jan 22, 2025, 12:58 PM
|
|
Maybe he felt he had to put Ole Miss high up there in order to justify Bama at 8? But they did win 10 games including an impressive Bowl win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11492]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
Jan 21, 2025, 11:58 PM
|
|
Cool beans
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4654]
TigerPulse: 97%
37
|
Re: Josh Pate Final Top 25
1
Jan 22, 2025, 3:12 AM
|
|
That guy is a loose cannon
He doesn’t know what he’s talking about, not more than me, you, or any person with relatively good football IQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1661]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
USC Trojans at 23 doesn't make sense at all***
1
Jan 22, 2025, 7:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24023]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 14333
Joined: 2013
|
They beat 2 $EC teams.
Jan 22, 2025, 7:28 AM
|
|
They clearly should be in the Top 10!
🙄
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1705]
TigerPulse: 99%
31
|
this is exactly the kind of crap I would imagine you read
1
Jan 22, 2025, 7:43 AM
|
|
Before you run back to all your gamecock buddies and high five each other.
When will yall hang the banner for this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69208]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 90615
Joined: 2001
|
Congratulations on winning one in a row...
1
Jan 22, 2025, 8:25 AM
|
|
and all that got you was an embarrassing loss in the TINGARA Cheese Cracker Bowl. You must be very proud!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 34
| visibility 5034
|
|
|
50
