Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
110%er [9086]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 13827
Joined: 7/1/02
|
What happened to our passing game......
Aug 31, 2014, 11:21 AM
|
|
especially in the 2nd half?
Serious question -
I thought we would have some success against their young DBs but nothing in the 2nd half - too much pressure on our QBs or our receivers being covered too well? I was surprised about that.
|
|
|
|
Legend [19210]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16717
Joined: 9/2/08
|
UGA's D caved in our O-line in and we had no time to run the
Aug 31, 2014, 11:22 AM
|
|
ball or pass it.
Message was edited by: AThomas®
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [523]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 901
Joined: 1/29/13
|
Re: UGA's D caved in our O-line in and we had no time to run the
Aug 31, 2014, 11:29 AM
|
|
??? Know how you stop line backers crashing ??
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [523]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 901
Joined: 1/29/13
|
Re: UGA's D caved in our O-line in and we had no time to run the
Aug 31, 2014, 11:33 AM
|
|
It's called a dump to the tight ends gotta do it bout every tenth play keeps backers at home and honest .. Mix in a yesssss draw play by the back bout every 12th play .. BOOM !
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1512]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 3475
Joined: 7/4/13
|
Re: UGA's D caved in our O-line in and we had no time to run the
Aug 31, 2014, 12:16 PM
|
|
Wynsvltiger: You are 100% correct. How many times did we throw to the TE over the middle?None. How many quick slant passes to the area vacated by their charging LBs? None. How many quick flare screen passes to a back? None. How many pure QB draw plays. Maybe, mayre one. The long and short of it is yes the OL needs to improve but we made no attempt at all to counter their aggressive line and LB play and I put that on the OC 100%.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51579]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43087
Joined: 8/10/04
|
You answered the question. QB pressure.***
Aug 31, 2014, 11:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19210]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16717
Joined: 9/2/08
|
Recruiting is the only way we can fix our line. We will do
Aug 31, 2014, 11:25 AM
|
|
good against most teams but NOT against elite competition.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46415
Joined: 4/23/00
|
We need to put as much emphasis on OL crootin' as we
Aug 31, 2014, 11:28 AM
|
|
do on WR crootin'. I know we got a nice haul this year, but that should be every year.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3590]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 6987
Joined: 11/30/12
|
Re: We need to put as much emphasis on OL crootin' as we
Aug 31, 2014, 11:41 AM
|
|
More. A good O line is worth its weight in gold. They create lanes for the running backs and give the QB time to wait for his receivers to get separation in the secondary. As witnessed last night, the QB's and receivers are hapless without their O line.
It seems like we treat O line recruitment as an afterthought. It should be our #1 priority. A good O line can make a mediocre back look good, but not vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5915]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8570
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: We need to put as much emphasis on OL crootin' as we
Aug 31, 2014, 11:42 AM
[ in reply to We need to put as much emphasis on OL crootin' as we ] |
|
Correct - signing two offensive linemen per year in the last two years is "death by a 1,000 cuts".
Don't forget the Maybank, Region, Anthony and Jones experiments and loss of DeStephano and Timothy.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1047]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1594
Joined: 11/17/09
|
O Line in the first half was great
Aug 31, 2014, 11:26 AM
|
|
O Line in the second half was horrible. WRs dropped way too many. Thats the ball game.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [170]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 122
Joined: 11/22/01
|
Re: What happened to our passing game......
Aug 31, 2014, 11:32 AM
|
|
I'll never understand why two backs are not put in the backfield to block when the pass rush is overwhelming our O line. I would much rather see 3 WRs running routes than 5 and the QB on his back.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2481]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 9264
Joined: 8/16/99
|
It was probably discussed a 1000 times
Aug 31, 2014, 11:34 AM
|
|
How to stop Clemson's offense (Stoudt)
Pressure, pressure, pressure.
and that's what they did, GA. No surprise, least it shouldn't be.
#21
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [7]
TigerPulse: 41%
Posts: 34
Joined: 8/31/08
|
Re: It was probably discussed a 1000 times
Aug 31, 2014, 11:46 AM
|
|
Quote:__________________________________________________
In the sweltering heat, Georgia’s players noticed Clemson players tiring. The Bulldogs made sure to take advantage.
“That’s when we started to rev up some of the pressures. We knew that as the game progressed, they couldn’t hang with us,” Jenkins said. “Some of the offensive guys were saying their defensive guys were getting tired. I think Theus said that (Clemson defensive lineman Vic) Beasley was cramping, some of their defensive guys were giving out. That just made us want to keep fighting more to be the better defense on the field that day.”
Georgia, on the other hand, didn’t fatigue. With the mass substitutions, players were fresh and ready to contribute at full speed when they were on the field.
http://www.macon.com/2014/08/31/3278256/georgia-shows-off-depth-on-defense.html?sp=/99/160/166/
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3590]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 6987
Joined: 11/30/12
|
Re: It was probably discussed a 1000 times
Aug 31, 2014, 11:55 AM
|
|
I thought we fixed that after the West Va debacle. Guess not.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19210]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16717
Joined: 9/2/08
|
Need O-production to help D out in tough tussel.
Aug 31, 2014, 12:02 PM
|
|
UGA had it. We have no big-time back to help keep our D fresh.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|