Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Is this pathetic defensive effort Steele 2.0?
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next
Replies: 4
| visibility 287

Is this pathetic defensive effort Steele 2.0?

3

Dec 21, 2024, 7:46 PM
Reply

Is it enough to get Wes canned? I know it's not 70 points but giving up almost 300 yds rushing is pretty bad. No denying the D has gotten progressively worse since he took over.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Is this pathetic defensive effort Steele 2.0?


Dec 21, 2024, 7:48 PM
Reply

I said that earlier, but will eat my crow. It wasn’t that bad, but certainly is why we lost. Cade threw for over 350 yards and we had over 400 yards of offense. Great effort in the 2nd half but the defense and the play calling on the 1 yard line on 3rd and 4th were costly!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Is this pathetic defensive effort Steele 2.0?

1

Dec 21, 2024, 7:50 PM
Reply

Definitely some questionable play calls on O but if the rushing d had put up any kind of fight that game would've had a different outcome.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Is this pathetic defensive effort Steele 2.0?

1

Dec 21, 2024, 7:51 PM
Reply

Objectively, it should.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes, it felt a lot like that game except this was running at will

1

Dec 21, 2024, 7:52 PM
Reply

Instead of passing at will.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 287
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next