|
Replies: 23
| visibility 249
|
Amateur [46]
TigerPulse: 14%
5
|
Ingram v Branch
Apr 27, 2012, 2:51 AM
|
|
To the guy who was talking a ton of noise a few months back about how much better Branch was than Ingram ---
Care to admit you were wrong?
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Day Hero [4529]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 27, 2012, 2:59 AM
|
|
I wasnt the guy but im gonna say this ingram is a talent and so is branch as far as their nfl careers it will depend on how SD uses ingram and how he adapts to what they want of him and same can be said of Branch who will more then likely be drafted as a 3-4 rush olb as well. So no one will or can admit to anything. Now scurry on and try to troll elsewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4529]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 27, 2012, 3:19 AM
|
|
One more thing their college sack stats werent far off either and Branch only played 2 seasons at clemson while ingram played all four years at Scar.
Branch - 17.5 Ingram-21.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [123]
TigerPulse: 16%
11
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
May 2, 2012, 4:31 PM
|
|
Ingram played 2 years as a DE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10403]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Care to admit you're a DA?
Apr 27, 2012, 4:29 AM
|
|
Since when does getting selected higher make you the better player? Was it because Ty Warren, Michael Haynes, J.McDougle, Calvin Pace, Tyler Brayton, and Chris Kelsay were all DE's drafted ahead of Osi Umenyiora?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4774]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
SD GM has made many poor moves in recent years....
Apr 27, 2012, 7:16 AM
|
|
I think when (shorty) Ingram flops as expected it may end his career in SD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60043]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 61397
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 27, 2012, 8:40 AM
|
|
Its laughable in cootville when you know that there is a True Freshman WR (Sammy Watkins) at Clemson that would if he could, would have been drafted a head of your best of all time WR Alshon (bad attitude coot) Jeffery. You coots have finally found out that the Tooth Ferry, Santa Claus, and Alshon Jeffery were all just a ferry tail. Silly coots!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 27, 2012, 9:17 AM
|
|
Ever heard of Sterling Sharpe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60043]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 61397
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 27, 2012, 9:22 AM
|
|
That is past history. Coots believe that what ever happen before their 2 or 3 decent years of success doesn't count....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 22%
11
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
May 2, 2012, 4:09 PM
|
|
Sorry, thought by all time the poster meant all time. Not sure how I could have misinterpreted that so badly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
dang, talking out both sides of your mouth
May 2, 2012, 5:20 PM
|
|
never would have thought a usuck fan would stoop to that level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [135]
TigerPulse: 18%
11
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 27, 2012, 8:33 PM
[ in reply to Re: Ingram v Branch ] |
|
and Clowney will get drafted before Watkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [94]
TigerPulse: 56%
10
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 28, 2012, 1:11 AM
|
|
I don't care what Thetis stats are Ingram is a straight up baller
I alway knew he was a good player, just didn't really give him much attention until this past year when he had the few big time highlight plays
However, I saw that sports science episode on Ingram an two things jump off the screen and slapped me across the face
1. Dude can bust out a standing back flip at 275lbs
2. He can dunk a basketball on a 10' goal and he is no more than 6'2"
Guys...that take and incredible, off the charts amount of athleticism
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2253]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
May 2, 2012, 5:32 PM
|
|
You're not taking into account the HGH !! Everybody knows what's going on there !! C'mon !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
May 2, 2012, 5:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: Ingram v Branch ] |
|
if you drink beer at the clemson/usuck games and we both are there ( and sammy and doo-doo both leave the same yr.) i'll take that for a 6-pak, and winner makes the choice of brands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [100]
TigerPulse: 93%
11
|
I agree with you...
May 2, 2012, 5:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: Ingram v Branch ] |
|
But only because great pass rushers are the most coveted outside of a great QB or great OT.
Doesn't mean he'll be better at his position, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [86429]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 81200
Joined: 1999
|
Ingram is faster, stronger, quicker, and plays every down.
Apr 27, 2012, 9:26 AM
|
|
Ingram is one of the reasons they dominated us up front last year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Ingram is faster, stronger, quicker, and plays every down.
May 2, 2012, 5:25 PM
|
|
jg, have you gone over to the dark side? just wondering because the recent posts that you have made presents a great argument for that thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2217]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Both are great talents
Apr 27, 2012, 9:36 AM
|
|
I think Ingram is more athletic for his size than Branch. Overall, Ingram probably had the better year but both were one-year wonders. Branch fits more of the mold of a pass-rushing OLB in a 3-4 while Ingram is a little more versatile. I don't think there is a big difference talent-wise though
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [22]
TigerPulse: 76%
3
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 27, 2012, 6:58 PM
|
|
Both are studs and, as someone else mentioned, getting drafted ahead of someone doesn't necessarily make you a better college player than that person.
However....with that said, I would give Ingram the nod over Branch since Ingram was a Consensus 1st Team All-American this past season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [46]
TigerPulse: 14%
5
|
well
Apr 27, 2012, 7:31 PM
|
|
high 2nd isn't bad
gotta say tho that neutral experts significantly prefer ingram
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4529]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Re: Ingram v Branch
Apr 28, 2012, 1:19 AM
|
|
No one in their right mind would dispute ingram being an incredible athlete. That being said sports science is bro science and i dont put alot of stock in bro science. Its pointless to argue this because both players are very good athletes and natural pass rushers. I will say this Ingram is better against the run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [360]
TigerPulse: 93%
16
|
Re: Ingram v Branch
May 2, 2012, 4:23 PM
|
|
Ingram was a 4-star recruit and the #21 outside linebacker in 2007.
Branch was a 2-star recruit and an unranked outside linebacker in 2007.
Ingram was picked 18th.
Branch was picked 38th.
I would say at this point Ingram did a little better but not by much. 10 years from now Branch may be having a Hall of Fame career and no one may remember Ingram. You just never know!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [195]
TigerPulse: 92%
12
|
Ferry... Really?***
May 2, 2012, 6:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 23
| visibility 249
|
|
|
50
