|
I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
storage
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
|
Replies: 30
| visibility 1355
|
Orange Blooded [2248]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 12:31 PM
|
|
How is that kick catch interference?
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Elite [5438]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 12:31 PM
|
|
Me got the confuse too
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2248]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 12:32 PM
|
|
Never touched him...terrible call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1436]
TigerPulse: 83%
29
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 12:36 PM
|
|
You don't need to touch him. Called the Halo rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 12:37 PM
|
|
The halo rule was dropped 20 years ago. You and this crew are the only ones who don’t know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1436]
TigerPulse: 83%
29
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
1
1
Sep 30, 2023, 1:21 PM
|
|
As usual, you're an idiot. They just shrunk it to a yard. Rule 44.
Foul for kick-catch interference. entered the one-yard area directly in front of receiver
https://rulebook.github.io/en/interpretations/rules/6/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2248]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [356]
TigerPulse: 96%
16
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 12:31 PM
|
|
I’m confused as well. Looked like no contact on the replay….
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62601]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 48242
Joined: 2000
|
Yeah, I don't understand the rule at all anymore.***
Sep 30, 2023, 12:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1942]
TigerPulse: 90%
31
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
1
Sep 30, 2023, 12:32 PM
|
|
Me too. I thought you actually had to make contact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5759]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
1
Sep 30, 2023, 12:33 PM
|
|
The refs need to go back and study the rules. What a clown bunch today. Seen better at high school games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [943]
TigerPulse: 96%
24
|
ACC officials bad anyway.and then the Noon
Sep 30, 2023, 12:36 PM
|
|
Game crew like the Hooters day crew.
Bad!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1436]
TigerPulse: 83%
29
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
1
Sep 30, 2023, 12:36 PM
[ in reply to Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule? ] |
|
Nah. You're wrong. In the NCAA, if you come within 1 yard of the returner prior to the catch, even if you don't make contact, it's kick-catch interference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 12:41 PM
|
|
https://www.espn.com/ncf/news/2003/0218/1510936.html![]() The NCAA Football Rules Committee has
eliminated the 2-yard ''halo'' rule on punt returns.
You are wrong and I don’t know how you’ve watched any college football in the last 20 years without losing your mind if you thought there was a halo rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1436]
TigerPulse: 83%
29
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 1:21 PM
|
|
Rule 44.
Foul for kick-catch interference. entered the one-yard area directly in front of receiver
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
1
Sep 30, 2023, 12:39 PM
[ in reply to Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule? ] |
|
The only thing is that you can’t impede catching the ball. So you can’t put your had in the face, between the arms, or touch the ball. But he did none of that and even moved back before ball arrived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5438]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 12:43 PM
|
|
Thanks for the explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1436]
TigerPulse: 83%
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: I thought they gor rid of the halo rule?
Sep 30, 2023, 1:53 PM
|
|
It literally doesn’t say that and also says that the “one yard” rule doesn’t apply if the defender steps back. You said “halo” which was specifically rescinded 20 years ago. I have no idea when this “one yard rule” that exists as a penalty only in one instance of dozens of examples was added and it shouldn’t have applied here since he stepped back before the catch. But let’s have flame war Mr 78%er I’ve never notice before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3775]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [4088]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Cause it wasnt kick catch interference
Sep 30, 2023, 12:32 PM
|
|
How is that kick catch interference?
|
| |
|
|
50
