I think the divisions in the conference is lame...
Nov 4, 2012, 8:17 AM
I say out of the 12 teams which ever two have the best record wins vs. losses at the end of the acc year should play in the ACCCG in Charlotte. This is a better test of time of the football season. Especially since there are teams in the conference that we and others don't play every year.
Re: I think the divisions in the conference is lame...
Nov 4, 2012, 8:43 AM
They need a clause stating if one division does not have a team ranked in the BCS 25, and two team in the same division are, and have better conference records then they play for the title.
Re: I think the divisions in the conference is lame...
Nov 4, 2012, 8:56 AM
It's just that, that not all teams play each other, that necessitates having divisions. Ideally both divisions would be equal, and the two division champions would represent the best two teams in the conference, but even if the divsions were equal when created, it is unrealistic to expect that will be true year in and year out. Look at the SEC. Alabama and LSU are the two best teams in that conference, but they are in the same divsion, so they cannot meet in the conference championship. In a year like this where Clemson and FSU are on a different level than all the other teams in the ACC, it does cause you to wonder about the way conference champioships are determined.
If both FSU and Clemson win out, and we get a BCS at large bid, we may end up with the better game. If we take care of business by winning, things usually have a way of working out. If not, we did what we could, and I won't complain about a 11-1 season.