Replies: 17
| visibility 1664
|
110%er [7372]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10310
Joined: 6/27/07
|
I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
2
Sep 3, 2024, 10:25 AM
|
|
defensive end? Did Tj Parker play? Lose his spot to Woods? Woods is a proto interior DL. I know their OL was Pro level and many will not be able to get after the QB consistently but we never got pressure or threatened to get pressure. Is this another depth issue for us?
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
CU Guru [1020]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 1997
Joined: 12/28/14
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
4
Sep 3, 2024, 10:33 AM
|
|
he needs to be on the inside find another DE.We get no pressure on the QB. Not even pro teams play 311 lbs DE. Totally out of position.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Orange Blooded [4249]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4958
Joined: 12/22/03
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
1
Sep 3, 2024, 10:33 AM
|
|
They were close to sacking Beck quite a few times. We have to remember they were up against one of the best, if not the best OL in the country
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
All-TigerNet [10133]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11672
Joined: 10/15/99
|
left out, money can buy ;-)***
Sep 3, 2024, 10:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
110%er [7515]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 5381
Joined: 2/20/24
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
Sep 3, 2024, 10:36 AM
|
|
It gives us our best players in the field and we needed a defensive end anyway. It was a need.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Legend [15687]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9946
Joined: 8/30/18
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
1
Sep 3, 2024, 10:37 AM
|
|
Lack of depth at DE...
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Letterman [269]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 231
Joined: 11/2/22
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
1
Sep 3, 2024, 1:07 PM
|
|
I thought Dabo said we had no needs anywhere. Guess that wasn't true.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Walk-On [149]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21
Joined: 8/28/24
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
Sep 3, 2024, 10:41 AM
|
|
Parker did play, and Woods is a proto interior DL, I agree. He mentioned in his interview that he was looking forward to being on DE, and spoke with Wilkins over the summer about being versatile along the line. That's all I know. I wish we had one more just like him honestly.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
CU Guru [1632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 545
Joined: 8/21/21
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
Sep 3, 2024, 12:57 PM
|
|
I believe Parker is wearing #3 this year. Hope that helps.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Orange Blooded [2264]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 1310
Joined: 2/11/24
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
Sep 3, 2024, 1:04 PM
|
|
He’s not an elite pass rusher. He peaked last year in a few games when he had 5 sacks all in that span
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Hall of Famer [23083]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31877
Joined: 11/30/98
|
First game of the season against a huge Georgia Offensive Line.
1
Sep 3, 2024, 11:05 AM
|
|
I think we see more AJ Hoffler et al now that Georgia is behind us.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Associate AD [815]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 1290
Joined: 5/4/03
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
Sep 3, 2024, 11:50 AM
|
|
We need our best on the field. Interior defensive line is very stout. He is fast enough for defensive end.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
CU Guru [1020]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 1997
Joined: 12/28/14
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
1
Sep 3, 2024, 12:08 PM
|
|
no he's quick but not fast enough put him back at his natural spot and put in a true DE.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Athletic Dir [861]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 995
Joined: 10/27/99
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
1
Sep 3, 2024, 1:02 PM
[ in reply to Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing ] |
|
2 things are not mutually exclusive. We are a little thin at DE and we have an abundance of talent at DT. Wood’s, Capeheart and Page are as good as there is on College Football. Tre Williams might be now that he is healthy. It is very tough to run the football on a front of Parker, Woods and those DTs
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
All-In [28615]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16622
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
Sep 3, 2024, 12:59 PM
|
|
Because we are thin as #### at DE, that's why. We missed on Patterson, he's a bust.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Orange Blooded [2264]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 1310
Joined: 2/11/24
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
Sep 3, 2024, 1:03 PM
|
|
Easy answer. No development and misevaluation
Cade Denhoff Zaire Patterson AJ Hoffler David Ojiuegbu transferred We recruit Jaheim Lawson because he’s Shaq’s brother
All of that is your answer. Dabo wanted this roster. He’s got it
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
All-In [28615]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16622
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
Sep 3, 2024, 1:05 PM
|
|
Too early to call Hoffler a bust, IMO.
|
|
|
|
![](https://2cic.b-cdn.net/t/forum/b.gif) |
Orange Blooded [2489]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3101
Joined: 9/1/16
|
Re: I think i missed it but what is the rationale again for Peter Woods playing
1
Sep 3, 2024, 1:05 PM
|
|
Woods registered a sack and 2 tackles for losses. Seems like he did just fine at DE.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1664
|
|
|