|
Replies: 51
| visibility 405
|
Game Changer [1876]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
#10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 10, 2013, 9:02 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [3889]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 10, 2013, 9:04 PM
|
|
Where are they getting a 2 place bump for staying idle??? The bias
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1876]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Their SOS will drop the next two weeks. Fla and Coastal.
Nov 10, 2013, 9:06 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7097]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
while we lost to
Nov 11, 2013, 4:44 PM
|
|
the #2 ranked team in the Nation. I agree it is ########, but what can we do? We have to wait until our showdown with them to prove what they are. FRAUDS! A team who wins by the skin of its teeth 60% of the time. But they have the "SEC card" they can pull out and say, "well those games were against SEC teams, they will finish at least 3rd in the ACC." Give me a break
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1846]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [441]
TigerPulse: 34%
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4512]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 10, 2013, 9:07 PM
|
|
Because of teams like Oklahoma and Miami losing in front of them, its pretty much what they rely on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4512]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 11, 2013, 8:57 AM
|
|
Now what stupid MF gave a thumbs down for me stating exactly why they moved in the top 10?? This is why its getting extremely annoying to even post on here, cause some people can't grow a pair between the legs and be realistic. Dir dir dir, how did they move into the top 10!?? dir dir dir gee I f'n wonder, teams lose in front of them!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 11, 2013, 9:03 AM
[ in reply to Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S. ] |
|
> Because of teams like Oklahoma and Miami losing in
> front of them, its pretty much what they rely on.
Isn't that what all teams rely on... you don't normally move up unless someone in front of you loses right? Whether by your hand or someone else's... SMH!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3246]
TigerPulse: 89%
34
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 12, 2013, 9:21 AM
|
|
Why do waste your time coming on this board!
Better yet leave stop wasting our time on this board!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3246]
TigerPulse: 89%
34
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 12, 2013, 9:22 AM
|
|
Yes that should have been a ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27397]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 33584
Joined: 2009
|
How did Georgia get back in there?***
Nov 10, 2013, 9:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3889]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
You havent heard
Nov 10, 2013, 9:46 PM
|
|
App State is a a quality win
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [63865]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 41297
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [80]
TigerPulse: 20%
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [145]
TigerPulse: 33%
11
|
Also beat...
Nov 10, 2013, 9:35 PM
|
|
#9 & #17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [713]
TigerPulse: 38%
22
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 10, 2013, 9:44 PM
|
|
Now it is tough to say who beat who, who lost to who given Clemson's Schedule
They did beat Mizzou, and UCF both in the top 15
If you go by that logic not much for the Tigers to hang our hats on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [846]
TigerPulse: 93%
23
|
Re: How is your pulse that high???***
Nov 10, 2013, 9:51 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3946]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Hey chknlkn you can hang yoyrs on this***
Nov 10, 2013, 9:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 23%
11
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 10, 2013, 10:11 PM
|
|
Can't downgrade us for losing to "#24 UGA" and claim you win over UGA as your signature win this year. See you in a few weeks, then we can talk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [444]
TigerPulse: 91%
17
|
So your logic is that our win over UGA = your loss to UGA..***
Nov 10, 2013, 10:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [72]
TigerPulse: 55%
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 11, 2013, 9:50 AM
[ in reply to Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S. ] |
|
Wrong. When we beat UGA we played fully healthy UGA squad that was preparing all off season for our opener. Lets not forget that was the same team offensively (and somewhat defensively) that almost beat Bama in the SECCCG. Their "Gurley" runningback team, Aaron Murray, etc.... UGA was in the hunt for the Heisman and the MNC, and at full health they are a team that has the talent and ability to play in that game.
So, yes, our win over UGA was HUGE. A win over UGA now with their entire team cripple with injuries everywhere is not a big challenge. However, if UGA had a fully healthy team you can bet they would be at 1 loss or undefeated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 11, 2013, 3:17 PM
|
|
Or you could say that their lack of depth and porous defense means that they were over rated pre-season.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12938
Joined: 2012
|
So not only do you coots lose to a pitiful UT team, but a
Nov 11, 2013, 5:37 PM
|
|
highly overrated UGA team that even had injuries to many of its star players?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: So not only do you coots lose to a pitiful UT team, but a
Nov 12, 2013, 8:58 AM
|
|
YUP!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [76]
TigerPulse: 28%
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1846]
TigerPulse: 59%
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12938
Joined: 2012
|
The kicker? Grasping for straws trying to make sense of the
Nov 11, 2013, 5:41 PM
|
|
situation isn't going to work. You have two poor losses. Next, you guys will be beating your chest over a win over UF lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5776]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
you have grown wise grasshopper***
Nov 10, 2013, 11:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14488]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 11103
Joined: 2012
|
What are you talking about?
Nov 11, 2013, 12:01 AM
|
|
Clemson is ranked 8 in BCS and AP, 6th in coaches
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2663]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
I don't like it either, but after thinking about it, I think
Nov 11, 2013, 9:09 AM
|
|
I see what's going on... Just like FSU jumped up right before they played us - then Miami got the bump before the FSU game. They have to bump SC before they play us, so that ESPN can hype "The game of the century!!!"
The upside to that is, WHEN we beat them, we've knocked off another Top-10 team (wink wink) instead of the #21-22 they should be ranked. It can only help us, and can't hurt us. But I agree - it is BS, and is ESPN manipulating the rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Thats 3 "games of the century" that we'll have had this year
Nov 11, 2013, 9:51 AM
|
|
At this point know we can't win them all, but we will definitely end it with a 2-1 record over ranked opponents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [441]
TigerPulse: 34%
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Do I believe that Clemson
Nov 11, 2013, 10:36 PM
|
|
with an elite, record setting QB, the best WR in the nation (with one of the best supporting WR corps in the nation), with a hard hitting rusher in McDowell that can match anything Davis can do, paired with our hard hitting power back Zac Brooks, complimented by our top 15 defense that leads the NCAA in sacks (where you at Clowney?) and team tackles for a loss will beat a weak Carolina team whose coaches fight on the sidelines, whose star player (dubbed "the best football player ever" by ESPN) a guy who was the Heisman frontrunner and projected to go 1st in the draft who sat out HALF of the season because he was too much of a lazy ##### to go play ball, AND they LOST to Tennessee and barely scraped out wins over Vandy, UCF (who had USuC shut out for almost 3 quarters...), Kentucky, and Mizzou?
Yes. I think we will beat the dirt peckers QUITE handily. Clemson 35, USuC 17.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [441]
TigerPulse: 34%
17
|
Was referring to the rankings part of your post.***
Nov 12, 2013, 6:07 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [102]
TigerPulse: 31%
11
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 11, 2013, 3:29 PM
|
|
Why are you so concerned about this crap? We just need to beat them and it will take care of itself. We have the opportunity to do that. Stop whining and win. Geez.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13855]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23084
Joined: 2004
|
Who's getting snubbed behind them? TAMU? Ok St?
Nov 11, 2013, 5:16 PM
|
|
UCLA? Fresno?
Please don't say Oklahoma St. They haven't played a single team that's even ranked right now. Their schedule has been atrocious and the computer polls barely even have them ranked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [441]
TigerPulse: 34%
17
|
This is is an odd year. After about #8, not many good teams
Nov 11, 2013, 6:43 PM
|
|
A lot of teams have bad losses. The number 10 team of this year would get waxed by the #10 team in previous years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [982]
TigerPulse: 93%
24
|
But who did they beat?***
Nov 11, 2013, 5:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: But who did they beat?***
Nov 12, 2013, 9:04 AM
|
|
If you're referring to SC, there are 2 teams in the top 15 of the BCS with their only losses to them. How many wins does CU have in that range?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Re: But who did they beat?***
Nov 12, 2013, 9:58 AM
|
|
Lol. Talk about an arbitrary way of looking at things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8598]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10323
Joined: 2003
|
Who cares. 30 Nov will tell the tale.***
Nov 11, 2013, 7:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [158]
TigerPulse: 34%
12
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 11, 2013, 10:38 PM
|
|
I can promise you we wouldn't lose 51-7 or 14 or whatever it was to anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5636]
TigerPulse: 97%
39
|
you lost to UT that got killed by bama and oregon***
Nov 11, 2013, 10:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12938
Joined: 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4795]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
also BS that A&M is 11 and UGa is 23 with 3 losses***
Nov 12, 2013, 8:53 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: also BS that A&M is 11 and UGa is 23 with 3 losses***
Nov 12, 2013, 9:02 AM
|
|
Using the logic on this board, UGa has 2 wins over top 15 BCS teams and two of their losses are to top 10 BCS teams... who do you rank ahead of them? It's called strength of schedule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13855]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23084
Joined: 2004
|
Somebody please give an actual argument as to why
Nov 12, 2013, 9:40 AM
[ in reply to also BS that A&M is 11 and UGa is 23 with 3 losses*** ] |
|
it's BS. It's easy to say stuff, but i want to see somebody actually try to make a case as to why this is so.
To start with, # of losses don't mean everything. I have absolutely no problem rating some 2-loss teams ahead of some 1-loss teams if i feel they are better and have played a tougher schedule. My reservations about A&M are due to the their defense giving up 40 a game, not because they have 2 losses.
Now let's go one step further. In order for it be a joke that SC is #10, A&M is #11, and UGA is #25 (they are 25, not 23 as you say) there must be teams behind them that are more deserving. We need to look at these teams ranked 12-15, etc and see if a case can be made. Easy enough...
#12 Oklahoma State - Only 1 loss (i know you guys get hung up on this), but they've played one of the weakest schedules in the country. Not a single team that they have played is currently ranked, and only two have winning records. They lost to a terrible WVU team. Those is not a top-10 team and the computer polls barely even have them ranked in the top 25. OK ST has NOT proven they are better than SC or A&M
#13 UCLA - Same record, but haven't played well against better competition. One pretty good win @Nebraska, but they got blown out by Stanford and Oregon. I might have them above A&M, but not SC.
#14 and #15 - Fresno and Northern Illinois - NO
#16 Michigan St - Terrible schedule and lost to ND. Their best win right now is Michigan and that's really not saying much.
As for UGA - They are mostly ranked ahead of other 3 loss teams, so who really cares? They beat some good teams before the injuries piled up. No other team ranked 26-30 has wins as good as SC and LSU or a schedule that ranks up there with what UGA has played.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [713]
TigerPulse: 38%
22
|
Re: #10??? Lost to #24 UGA and unranked Tenn. Total B.S.
Nov 12, 2013, 10:11 AM
|
|
What exactly are voters giving to Clemson to have them ranked highly?
Win over UGA by 3 at home
Big loss at home to FSU
At 6-3 UGA has the best record of anyone Clemson has beaten. This is my argument for why the ACC screws Clemson. You have to go out of conference to find a decent team to play and get a win. If USC and UGA win out Clemson gets wins over both they will be the best wins on the books? That does not set up well for the future? You want big games in conference and the ACC does not give that to the Tigers
30-35 that's the overall record of the teams Clemson has beaten
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 51
| visibility 405
|
|
|
50
