Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Fun stat on Bamas OL
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 11
| visibility 1,401

Fun stat on Bamas OL

6
Jan 3, 2024, 12:21 PM
Reply

They gave up more sacks this year then the coots yet people will still say they wish they had an OL like Bamas lol

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'd still take bama's OL over the coots OL any day.***

4
Jan 3, 2024, 12:22 PM
Reply



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Their rush offense ranked 46th nationally...

2
Jan 3, 2024, 12:30 PM
Reply

which is pretty low by Alabama standards.

Comparatively speaking, Clemson's rush offense was ranked 42nd while UofSC was 126th.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Re: Fun stat on Bamas OL

1
Jan 3, 2024, 12:44 PM
Reply

They were definitely turnstiles in the Michigan game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Fun stat on Bamas OL

2
Jan 3, 2024, 12:45 PM
Reply

They seemed pretty stout against Georgia.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Fun stat on Bamas OL

3
Jan 3, 2024, 12:51 PM
Reply

I think this demonstrates how good Rattler was with a bad OL. Dude was always running for his life.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

This will be an unpopular take, but we are

2
Jan 3, 2024, 12:55 PM
Reply

Likely a playoff team this year and last with rattler as our qb. Might have got our buts kicked in the semis, but I bet we would have made it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: This will be an unpopular take, but we are

2
Jan 3, 2024, 12:59 PM
Reply

I said earler this year, if we had Leggette and Rattler, we would have been a good playoff team.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: This will be an unpopular take, but we are

1
Jan 3, 2024, 1:20 PM [ in reply to This will be an unpopular take, but we are ]
Reply

Just call me Rumplestiltskin. I awakened to read posters on TNet are wishing for Coot players. Clemson needs nothing from that trash program.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not wishing for their players. Just stating

1
Jan 3, 2024, 1:46 PM
Reply

an opinion. All our offensive issues are not on QB, but a good/great qb can cover up a bunch of those issues. I think you saw that in Trevor's last year.
Hopefully Cade continues to improve and gets us into the top 12 next year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Fun stat on Bamas OL

2
Jan 3, 2024, 1:37 PM [ in reply to Re: Fun stat on Bamas OL ]
Reply

I always thought he had a good arm and was fairly accurate. Definitely good enough to help a good team make a run. They had a porous OL and no running game. Makes life tough on a QB.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MEG


Re: Fun stat on Bamas OL

1
Jan 3, 2024, 1:35 PM
Reply

And said to have 4 at 350 lbs plus. I know the center looked bad and the left tackle I believe was a freshman.

Never played but I hear that group works best when they work in unison. A few weak links and the whole OL looks bad.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MEG


Replies: 11
| visibility 1,401
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Very nice gesture from Coach Bakich

by BaseballCharlie®

Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic