|
Replies: 51
| visibility 1642
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45365
Joined: 2012
|
FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 8:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1832]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
McShay is a hack
Oct 4, 2017, 8:38 PM
|
|
I know more about football than he does. Why is he even a football analyst?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2640]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
McHacksay. Shall we add it to the Tigernet vernacular?
Oct 4, 2017, 8:43 PM
|
|
You say?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1832]
TigerPulse: 97%
31
|
How about Todd McSHack?
Oct 4, 2017, 8:45 PM
|
|
Not to be confused with a milk shake or where a McDonald's employee might live.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2640]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
True but McHacksay(s) can start a sentence.
Oct 4, 2017, 8:49 PM
|
|
Example.
McHacksays that DW4 could be the best player he kind of studied but got absolutely wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [193]
TigerPulse: 87%
12
|
Re: McShay is a hack
Oct 4, 2017, 8:48 PM
[ in reply to McShay is a hack ] |
|
hack is too kind of a word. attention ##### is more like it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2659]
TigerPulse: 74%
33
|
you children are so predictable . . .
Oct 5, 2017, 12:52 AM
[ in reply to McShay is a hack ] |
|
let someone say anything that is fumbling all over our Clemson players . and they're idiots, hacks, etc. Its a typical response from inexperienced people in life. LOl You guys are something. I love Deshuan. I think he has done awesome so far and I hope he is a great player for a long time. But he's not god, he's not perfect. Go Texans!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4745]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Nobody likes McShay. He made a comment in late 2015 that
Oct 5, 2017, 6:13 AM
|
|
Watson would be a late round draft pick in 2017. People who follow colllege and pro football bust on McShay all the time. He is much like Finebom, just a novelty to stir up hits on websites.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2659]
TigerPulse: 74%
33
|
so what . . .
Oct 5, 2017, 10:34 AM
|
|
you expect everyone to feel exactly the same about everyone? It ridiculous. The people who thought wrongly have to eat their words now . . no biggie. He has a job, to give his opinion. We are biased, they see things differently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21197]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 10194
Joined: 2004
|
Re: so what . . .
Oct 5, 2017, 1:32 PM
|
|
So, he's allowed to have his opinion.
But we're not allowed to have ours if it disagrees with his because it's mean?
Shut up man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [247]
TigerPulse: 77%
13
|
Re: McShay is a hack
Oct 5, 2017, 2:45 AM
[ in reply to McShay is a hack ] |
|
If he is so great at evaluating talent then why is he making 40,000$ a year at espn and not with a NFL team guy is stupid as he looks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: McShay is a hack
Oct 5, 2017, 3:03 PM
[ in reply to McShay is a hack ] |
|
He is still betting against Deshaun, while saying the more he is around Watson the more he learns not to bet against him. Wow! He is so invested on other QBs will be better than Deshaun that he can not admit he was wrong and break the cycle. It is downright comical to see him state he couldn't see the intangibles in his film study. It was all right there on display, three years worth, of film. Including, two 400+ passing yards versus the All-World/Pro Bama D. The first time without Mike Williams and Deon Cain. Good grief, Todd, just admit it already. You either have some personal vendetta or you did not fully do your job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [706]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 8:44 PM
|
|
As I recall it, Seattle recently won a SuperBowl using this offense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [193]
TigerPulse: 87%
12
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 8:50 PM
|
|
How about Tom Brady and New England?, I don't/didn't pay much attention when he was drafted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22040]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14295
Joined: 1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [566]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 8:44 PM
|
|
Isn’t this the same guy that tried to convince everyone that Brian Brohm had more “upside” than Aaron Rodgers? I’ll pass...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1563]
TigerPulse: 81%
30
|
Breaking news: McShay still skeptical of Tom Brady. Didn't
Oct 4, 2017, 8:45 PM
|
|
grade out well. Only 5th round material, just like Watson. This guy sure is a poor talent evaluator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2384]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 8:45 PM
|
|
So, Todd says of Deshaun Watson:
"His unique trait is his leadership and his ability to play big in the biggest moments. It’s hard to know that studying the tape."
What? For Heaven's sake, McShay. "It's hard to know that studying the tape"? How the he77 could you MISS that watching tape? I would almost say that you are a "perfect idiot", but nobody's perfect!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1699]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 5, 2017, 7:08 AM
|
|
Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16790]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 13322
Joined: 1998
|
If you were wrong before then why should we believe now?***
Oct 4, 2017, 8:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13501]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 12252
Joined: 2000
|
McShay not 'sustainable' as a credible analyst***
Oct 4, 2017, 8:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [328]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 8:59 PM
|
|
Ah.... the ol Todd McTool at it again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [416]
TigerPulse: 100%
17
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 8:59 PM
|
|
Of course he would say this, because he doesn't want to be proven wrong, and now maybe there is a chance he can say "I told you so" down the road. I hope Watson keeps killing it and guys like McShay get off the #### field. These so called "talent scouts". Ugh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43302]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11048
Joined: 2017
|
Todd just man up and admit you are wrong. It's OK dude. We are all wrong sometimes.***
Oct 4, 2017, 9:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7819]
TigerPulse: 97%
42
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 9:08 PM
|
|
Every time you think McGhey can't say something more stupid than before he goes and does it......Calling him an idiot is being kind because he is not that smart......he needs to just frigging GO AWAY.....Go Tigers!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1868]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
That's actually a fair assessment of the situation
Oct 4, 2017, 9:24 PM
|
|
But one thing I would have rebutted is that the RPO isn't necessarily hard to defend in concept....it is what it is. It's the guy running the show that makes it tough. Watson will eventually hit a rookie wall but he'll overcome that and adapt as needed. But he is such a good decision maker that the RPO will have sustained success.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2454]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 9:28 PM
|
|
Mc Whatever, you just exposed your Achilles. You don't know what you don't know. Imagine that, an analyst admitting that, even if unintended. Careers over cause no one believes you anymore.
DW4 is a winner no matter what. He's proven that. You won't admit cause you didn't see it first. Find another line of work, if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1239]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19865]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18097
Joined: 2012
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 9:30 PM
|
|
"McShay isn’t as willing as some pundits to concede the Chicago Bears drafting former UNC quarterback Mitchell Trubisky over Watson was a mistake..."
So what pundit that is worth a $hit, and was a proponent of Trubisky has actually said Chicago made a mistake?
Seems like its too soon for the Trubisky folks to,throw the towel in. This seems like a very Breitbartish move by TigerNet.
I personally think DW is superior to Mitch but I can't believe that a supporter of the Tar Heel would concede so soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [80814]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 37378
Joined: 2003
|
15 years from now when DeShaun retires as a perennial
Oct 4, 2017, 9:34 PM
|
|
All-Pro and First Ballot Hall of Famer, McShay will say, "See, I told you he wouldn't last."
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [577]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 9:40 PM
|
|
What a non committed fence post type statement. He said nothing really . Useless non speak
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11851]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 9:48 PM
|
|
I love it when morons like McShay double down on their stupidity!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [268]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
At some point you would think a family
Oct 4, 2017, 10:00 PM
|
|
Member would tell McShay how Dumb he sounds...dude is straight up making a fool of himself....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [38595]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 33261
Joined: 2011
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 10:01 PM
|
|
About DW4'S ability to win in the biggest moments , Todd McShay said this:
" It's hard to see that on film " .
There are about 2 dozen examples on YouTube showing DW4 winning when the chips were down , the clock was short and the games were in the balance .
Perhaps Todd McShay doesn't interweb ? Is in permanent TV abstinence ?
What kind of analyst doesn't do analysis before reporting on that which they analyze?
Words escape me .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2233]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 4, 2017, 10:11 PM
|
|
Todd McShay is a joke. Stating that he is surprised Deshaun is having so much success. Well I am surprised they still have you st ESPN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2295]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Helloooo?!?! McShay?!?!?! Helloooooo???***
Oct 4, 2017, 10:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [1]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: Helloooo?!?! McShay?!?!?! Helloooooo???***
Oct 5, 2017, 6:45 AM
|
|
Mcshay is about as funny as a screen door on a battleship.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11128]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13201
Joined: 2014
|
I can think of only 2 reasons McSway still has a job at Espin...
Oct 4, 2017, 10:21 PM
|
|
1. He must work really, really cheap.
2. Espin figures folks watch him just to see what stupid ##### he says next!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3247]
TigerPulse: 93%
34
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 5, 2017, 12:21 AM
|
|
Those who can - do.
Those who can’t - teach.
Those who don’t know their a$$ from a hole in the ground - work for ESPN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [4051]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [312]
TigerPulse: 79%
15
|
Behind Darnold? LOL now he is just trollin***
Oct 5, 2017, 3:14 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [476]
TigerPulse: 94%
18
|
Re: Behind Darnold? LOL now he is just trollin***
Oct 5, 2017, 8:27 AM
|
|
yep I don't understand how Darnold gets so much credit but he is on track to throw more picks this year than watson did last year. It's stupid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [248]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
worse than that, behind Josh Allen
Oct 5, 2017, 2:18 PM
[ in reply to Behind Darnold? LOL now he is just trollin*** ] |
|
the Josh Allen love is crazy. It's like the Logan Thomas love x10. He's got a strong arm, that's it. He's a bad QB. 26th in QBR last year. 81st so far this year. 81st!! And McShay would pick him over Watson?!?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [941]
TigerPulse: 79%
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6773]
TigerPulse: 81%
41
Posts: 12496
Joined: 2005
|
If only Watson wasn't so one dimensional. If he ever learns
Oct 5, 2017, 3:27 AM
|
|
to stay in the pocket, he may have a future as an NFL QB.
I kid, I kid.
What McShay fails to understand is that Watson is NOT a one trick pony. He has a strong and accurate arm. He can throw on the run, deliver the ball from the pocket, and just when you least expect it, he can run with the ball. He isn't a Michael Vick, He's a Steve Young with great speed. Add to that his maturity, leadership abilities, and his generosity and you have the makings of a Hall of Famer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5958]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
What a Bafoon
Oct 5, 2017, 7:13 AM
|
|
McShay has always been over-the-top stupid, but this takes the cake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5958]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Buffoon
Oct 5, 2017, 7:14 AM
|
|
...whoops
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [661]
TigerPulse: 86%
21
|
we won't know who is the best until 3 years - RG3...
Oct 5, 2017, 8:23 AM
|
|
You have to give any pro 3 years to see what kind of player they are. The pro has to be good enough to get 3 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2021]
TigerPulse: 81%
31
|
don't worry you guys
Oct 5, 2017, 10:22 AM
|
|
i just tweeted that tool and i tweeted him good. Trump style
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1380]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
What a turd. Keep doing your thing DW4!
Oct 5, 2017, 12:00 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: FB Update: ESPN analyst: New-look Texans offense not 'sustainable' under Watson
Oct 5, 2017, 7:22 PM
|
|
Darnold better than Watson???? Bahahahahaha how does this loser still have a job????
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1270]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
McShame missed on his assessment of DW4 but his ego ---
Oct 9, 2017, 2:24 PM
|
|
is too big to admit it! Now he is doubling down by bringing in 2018 Potential Draft Picks into the equation. What a bust McShame actually is!!! And the ESPN Management that kept him and let some mighty good Reporters go, got Stupid all over their hands also! But I am looking forward to seeing McShames number 1 Rookie QB (Mitchell T.) compete tonight. Go Tigers - Beat Syracuse!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 51
| visibility 1642
|
|
|
50
.
