|
Replies: 35
| visibility 109
|
Gridiron Giant [16038]
TigerPulse: 98%
50
Posts: 18682
Joined: 2009
|
ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 9:34 AM
|
|
1. Oregon
2. Bama - HAHAHA
3. Ohio St
4. TCU
5. UGA - WHAT???
6. Baylor
7. Mich St - Below Baylor???
8. AUBURN - 8-5?????? - ARE YOU KIDDING ME????????
9. Ole Miss - HOLY $H!!!T
10. Miss St - There's no way this is real life
11. FSU
12. UCLA
13. USC
14. Stanford
15. ARKANSAS - 7-6, Arkansas is 7-6. Arkansas LOST 6 GAMES
16. Oklahoma - What?
17. LSU
18. KST
19. GT - LOL
20 Wis - 11-3 and beat Auburn
21. Clemson
|
|
|
|
 |
Gridiron Giant [16038]
TigerPulse: 98%
50
Posts: 18682
Joined: 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3245]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 9:36 AM
|
|
Is this current?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [98575]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 97866
Joined: 2009
|
It reflect that OU and OSU have a shot at the NCG.
Jan 3, 2015, 9:40 AM
|
|
So yeah, it's current.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3331]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 9:40 AM
[ in reply to Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look! ] |
|
Says it is updated daily. Wow and it just any credibility it had. Wha a joke that and ESPN are. They do not realize that the only reason people watch are because we have no other option for CFB. I no longer watch gameday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [49902]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 30364
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64655]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 41678
Joined: 2004
|
5 of the top 10, sounds about right. LOL.***
Jan 3, 2015, 9:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2384]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
...and 7 of the top 20...
Jan 3, 2015, 9:51 AM
|
|
with a combined winning percentage of 69.5%... an average w/l record of 9-4...
How do these people keep a straight face?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [64655]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 41678
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [98575]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 97866
Joined: 2009
|
I've inverted factors in a formula a few times myself.
Jan 3, 2015, 9:38 AM
|
|
It's the quickest way to screw the mathematical pooch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [785]
TigerPulse: 95%
22
|
Re: I've inverted factors in a formula a few times myself.
Jan 3, 2015, 9:43 AM
|
|
this has to be a joke....ESPN is making fools out of themselves
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14456]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13320
Joined: 2013
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 9:44 AM
|
|
This HAS to be some kind of glitch. No way in hell do they have Bama ahead of Ohio St.
Has to be a glitch, doesn't it?
Not even espn is this stupid. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11128]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13201
Joined: 2014
|
This is a computer index-would like to compare last week to
Jan 3, 2015, 12:00 PM
|
|
this one, and see how the teams moved. Obviously, the SEC teams didn't move down nearly enough. Computer is biased too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [36]
TigerPulse: 75%
4
|
Re: This is a computer index-would like to compare last week to
Jan 3, 2015, 12:14 PM
|
|
More and more on National radio is talk of 4 letter SEC bias and parity in college football. Shame you can't watch the games except on the 4 latter. But people aren't as dumb as the 4 letter thinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4515]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
ESPN is like a Pimp trying to sell off
Jan 3, 2015, 9:48 AM
|
|
65 yr old hookers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3729]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
ESPIN and SEC Hype
Jan 3, 2015, 9:49 AM
|
|
Heres how it works
Bama Beat #8, #10 and had a good loss to #9 and #3 thus a #2 ranking LMAO
And of course just circle jerk it around for the other SEC teams.
Throw in a requirement that there a gazillion SEC teams in the Top 10 and that's how you do it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3729]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Ark moving like a rocket, given a another week
Jan 3, 2015, 9:51 AM
|
|
and ESPIN would have them in the top 5. Because of many great losses to the great SEC West.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [664]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 10:07 AM
|
|
That just cannot be right, surely not !! If so, they are just making fools of themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6821]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 10:10 AM
|
|
So, apparently:
espn = fantasyland
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [36452]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 18324
Joined: 2013
|
They use a formula to determine it.
Jan 3, 2015, 10:37 AM
|
|
This when they weight SEC teams more heavily it props up all of their wins and losses. At one point during the season I think they had 9 SEC teams in the top 15 of their FPI.
It is a huge joke and looks even worse now that we saw OOC games by these teams an then they still are top 10 after losing to another team that is currently ranked lower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6896]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Surely, that is not current?***
Jan 3, 2015, 10:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16315]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 10:44 AM
|
|
Here is the Harley rating of college football teams today:
1. Oregon (13-1)
2. Ohio State (13-1)
3. TCU (12-1)
4. Alabama (12-2)
5. Michigan State (11-2)
6. Florida State (13-1)
7. Baylor (12-2)
8. Georgia Tech (11-3)
9. Missouri (11-3)
10. Wisconsin (11-3)
11. Boise State (12-2)
12. Georgia (10-3)
13. Clemson (10-3)
14. Arizona State (10-3)
15. Mississippi State (10-3)
16. Arizona (10-4)
17. UCLA (10-3)
18. Memphis (10-3)
19. Kansas State (9-4)
20. Ole Miss (9-4)
21. Duke (9-4)
22. Louisville (9-4)
23. Marshall (13-1)
24. Utah (9-4)
25. Nebraska (9-4)
My evaluation is not perfect but it's a lot more connected to the real world than anything the ESPN pimps say about college football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [664]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 10:51 AM
|
|
Seems legit...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [148]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 10:56 AM
|
|
I thought the espn power rankings were based on fan votes? Could be wrong but that could be why they are so out of sorts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6896]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [62102]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 43286
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [14067]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 23297
Joined: 2004
|
A lot of the advanced metrics still really like Bama.
Jan 3, 2015, 10:56 AM
|
|
It's not just ESPN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6896]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Past tense - did like Bama!***
Jan 3, 2015, 11:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14456]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13320
Joined: 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [115]
TigerPulse: 94%
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [98575]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 97866
Joined: 2009
|
You didn't know that 2+2=9?
Jan 3, 2015, 11:48 AM
|
|
###, your dum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11128]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13201
Joined: 2014
|
Is this the same ESPN Power Index that had us
Jan 3, 2015, 11:49 AM
|
|
ranked around 13-14 mid-season?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11128]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13201
Joined: 2014
|
All this show is how deep the bias is
Jan 3, 2015, 11:56 AM
|
|
When you have SEC ranked way too high all season long, even the computer metrics won't ignore it. All this computerized stuff has human input. The human input is wrong, the computer output will be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11128]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 13201
Joined: 2014
|
Surprised ARK isn't in top 10, mosly lost in SEC, won bowl
Jan 3, 2015, 11:58 AM
|
|
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [16034]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 17550
Joined: 1999
|
We should start accepting that ESPN is making an unabashed
Jan 3, 2015, 1:18 PM
|
|
business decision to influence perspective in favor of the SEC. They are financially vested in the SEC network. It would serve all of our sanity to just accept that they no longer have interest in objectively providing news and coverage of this sport. It is a shame, but it is what it is. Their commentators, polls, etc, should be taken no more seriously than a GM review on their cars' safety or UNC's internal investigation on academic misconduct.
I would be more than happy if the ACC aligned with Fox Sports or NBC Sports or whatever for their future programming, even for a slightly smaller pay. It would serve the sport well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5298]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: ESPN Power Index (RPI) for Football. LOL. Take a look!
Jan 3, 2015, 1:26 PM
|
|
I see there is no area for comments on that page. That is probably the most intelligent thing going on that page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 35
| visibility 109
|
|
|
50
