|
Replies: 50
| visibility 4212
|
Legend [6896]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
1
3
Mar 22, 2024, 9:57 PM
|
|
I stated that if they lost tonight, I would be in favor of firing him, now I am hoping they win a couple of more and even if not, I say give him another chance. 3 Good recruits coming in plus Chef,
p,Godfrey returning plus some other talented sophomores. Now, to get big strong center in the portal, and the Tigers will have another promising year coming up!
|
|
|
|
 |
Asst Coach [858]
TigerPulse: 83%
23
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
2
4
Mar 22, 2024, 9:59 PM
|
|
Anybody know if Neff offered the CofC coach tonight? He looked great and would be a lock to win 15 or 16.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2674]
TigerPulse: 74%
33
|
So unlike you my young lad . . .
5
5
5
5
Mar 22, 2024, 10:10 PM
|
|
I don't make decisions based on one game . . whether a win or a loss. Seriously, that's as deep as your thought process goes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6896]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
Actually, I am an elder with 80 yr. BDay coming up, and I have been
2
Mar 23, 2024, 9:32 AM
|
|
fans of the Tigers for many years, so it was based on years of observing Tiger coaches...and since they had lost 3 of 4 going into the tournament, and looked so bad against BC, I am very happy our Tigers turned around, Clemson B. S. 1966. Ride your ponies and watch your judgements ol Pete
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2952]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
I thought we played pretty well, but New Mexico
3
Mar 22, 2024, 10:15 PM
|
|
Being about the worst shooting team I’ve ever seen helped our cause. Hopefully next game we can play well too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10560]
TigerPulse: 96%
45
Posts: 11952
Joined: 2003
|
Re: I thought we played pretty well, but New Mexico
3
2
Mar 22, 2024, 10:31 PM
|
|
Being about the worst shooting team I’ve ever seen helped our cause. Hopefully next game we can play well too.
UNM has been held to under 60 twice this season with one of the two happening today. Just good D…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: I thought we played pretty well, but New Mexico
4
Mar 22, 2024, 10:51 PM
|
|
lol. We don’t play d this season. If you were a fan you’d know that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12289]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
We're 47th in KenPom's adjusted defensive rankings which puts us in the 87th
3
Mar 23, 2024, 9:50 AM
|
|
Percentile, but hey you're the real fan so whatever you say goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: We're 47th in KenPom's adjusted defensive rankings which puts us in the 87th
Mar 23, 2024, 9:52 AM
|
|
Man you are a rube.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12289]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
And you're not a fan
4
Mar 23, 2024, 10:04 AM
|
|
Your posting activity quadruples after losses and you only come on here after wins to let us know why that win isn't as good as we think it is. Your team in Columbia lost Thursday go away and leave Clemson fans alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: And you're not a fan
Mar 23, 2024, 3:59 PM
|
|
My 4 posts yesterday? You nailed it. If you believe yourself a Clemsonnfan you are the definition of a useful idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17333]
TigerPulse: 91%
51
Posts: 27477
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14707]
TigerPulse: 81%
49
Posts: 23196
Joined: 1998
|
Re: And you're not a fan
1
1
Mar 23, 2024, 4:16 PM
[ in reply to And you're not a fan ] |
|
User Logo
geech72®
110%er [8121]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5061
Joined: 9/7/09
And you're not a fan 3
Mar 23, 2024, 10:04 AM [ in reply to Re: We're 47th in KenPom's adjusted defensive rankings which puts us in the 87th ]
Reply
Your posting activity quadruples after losses and you only come on here after wins to let us know why that win isn't as good as we think it is. Your team in Columbia lost Thursday go away and leave Clemson fans alone.
been trying to tell yall that for years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: And you're not a fan
Mar 23, 2024, 4:21 PM
|
|
Like when I was the last guy getting your back about Leggett? Right before he was fired and Monte Lee magically became the best coach in America? You have a great track record.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [56339]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 16929
Joined: 2020
|
Re: I thought we played pretty well, but New Mexico
7
7
Mar 22, 2024, 10:53 PM
[ in reply to Re: I thought we played pretty well, but New Mexico ] |
|
Not. Maybe you need to re-watch the game. They missed a ton of wide open shots. Plus, we are the best team they've played all year. Zero teams on their schedule we would not be favorite.
The sky west Mac or whatever their conference is, is crap. They were not getting in without winning their conference tournament. That trophy was their natty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [666]
TigerPulse: 86%
21
|
Re: I thought we played pretty well, but New Mexico
2
Mar 23, 2024, 9:52 AM
|
|
And they were favored to win.
What are you smoking? That was a great win. Check all your baggage at the door please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: I thought we played pretty well, but New Mexico
1
Mar 23, 2024, 10:01 AM
|
|
The fact that the betting public picked New Mexico to win should tell you all you need to know about the outside view of Brad Brownell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2203]
TigerPulse: 81%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4475]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3775]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: I thought we played pretty well, but New Mexico
2
Mar 23, 2024, 9:30 AM
|
|
The Lobos lead the country in two-point shots per game (45.5) and sit fifth in two-point shots made per game (23.4) before the game.
They shot 29.7% from the field and 39% from 2 (41 shots) / 13% from 3 (23 shots).
They shot below average but tried more 3s than usual due to trailing/defence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14820]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [47998]
TigerPulse: 77%
58
Posts: 35587
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1888]
TigerPulse: 90%
31
|
Re: Did you ever consider the fact that we had something to do with that?
4
Mar 23, 2024, 12:02 AM
|
|
That's a stretch. Our interior defense was fine. We dared them to hit shots and they didn't. Our perimeter defense has been bad pretty much since the new year, we just got a matchup that couldn't take advantage. If we give Baylor the same looks we gave NM they'll run us out of the building.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [162]
TigerPulse: 85%
12
|
Re: Did you ever consider the fact that we had something to do with that?
2
Mar 23, 2024, 5:56 AM
|
|
What's the problem with making a bad shooting team shoot?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1888]
TigerPulse: 90%
31
|
Re: Did you ever consider the fact that we had something to do with that?
Mar 23, 2024, 12:09 PM
|
|
As a one time thing? Nothing, it works. But this game doesn't convince me that we've actually fixed our perimeter defense issues. It just tells me we got away with it because the other team can't shoot. I said similar things after the game against Queens that the defense wasn't very good and we were fortunate the matchup let us get away with it and was told I didn't know what I was talking about. Fast forward a couple weeks and we're letting Miami and Virginia Tech spot up like they're in shootaround. Ultimately the result is what matters, but obtaining good results from a flawed process is not sustainable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [666]
TigerPulse: 86%
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [666]
TigerPulse: 86%
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24117]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 11288
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
4
Mar 22, 2024, 10:27 PM
|
|
you gotta take in the whole record. Played good tonight... doesn't explain the crappy last twoish weeks. Always seems to be 'just' enough. we'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [47998]
TigerPulse: 77%
58
Posts: 35587
Joined: 2003
|
So youre choosing to place more importance on games from 1-2 weeks ago
4
Mar 22, 2024, 11:01 PM
|
|
than today’s NCAA Tournament game?!?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2721]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
Games down the stretch matter
4
Mar 23, 2024, 12:07 AM
|
|
And de-motivating your team for the ACC tournament and then losing by 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6338]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [666]
TigerPulse: 86%
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8143]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
6
6
Mar 22, 2024, 10:43 PM
|
|
Nope. Will take a final four appearance before even reconsider my position on Brownell. Too much water over the ###.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8143]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
2
Mar 22, 2024, 10:44 PM
|
|
Seriously, the name for a water #### is banned on tigernet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8143]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
1
Mar 22, 2024, 10:44 PM
|
|
Holy cow! What is the problem with references to ways to hold back water?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11614]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
3
Mar 22, 2024, 10:58 PM
|
|
Please control your water!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5161]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1700]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Nope... still think he has had more than enough seasons to prove who he is
2
Mar 22, 2024, 10:46 PM
|
|
and what he is capable of. There were no adjustments needed today, we out ran UNM in the first 5 minutes and never looked back. It's easy to not have to coach a team running away with it. I still say he is 5 seasons past his prime, this is just an example of a broken clock being right twice a day...
I want to see him COACH this team to the Elite 8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [666]
TigerPulse: 86%
21
|
Re: Nope... still think he has had more than enough seasons to prove who he is
2
1
Mar 23, 2024, 9:55 AM
|
|
COACH this team to an elite 8. OK.
We are all waiting for your COACHING assessment. Your expertise on message boarding should not go to waste.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17512]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11258
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
2
Mar 22, 2024, 10:52 PM
|
|
Anyone “else”? You never changed yours pumper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [551]
TigerPulse: 99%
20
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
3
Mar 22, 2024, 10:56 PM
|
|
No, credit is due tho as they looked great. Pretty sure CBB is here for a few more after today. Would and will be pulling for those Tigers. Dont wear a coaches name on my shirt. Cant wait for the next one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11614]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
5
5
Mar 22, 2024, 10:59 PM
|
|
NO! One game gonna change 14yrs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5161]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
when we got a 6-seed, I knew he wouldnt be fired
2
Mar 22, 2024, 11:07 PM
|
|
I am still in favor of moving on, but I know it’s not happening, so no change in my mind. A win against Baylor, and I’ll reconsider my position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [4030]
TigerPulse: 99%
35
|
If given the decision to appoint ChatGPT as the CLEM head coach - I would
1
Mar 23, 2024, 12:00 AM
|
|
…do it tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4422]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
4
Mar 23, 2024, 7:04 AM
|
|
If one game can change a persons mind on a coach for good or bad it’s a good thing that person is not the AD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6896]
TigerPulse: 99%
41
|
I was pulling for Coach B. until they lost 3 of 4 at the end including
Mar 23, 2024, 2:56 PM
|
|
that pathetic ACC tourney game, then I thought oh, no another terrible ending to the season like Morehead ST. last year. So it was not a one game thing....GO TIGERS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1683]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
1
Mar 23, 2024, 9:12 AM
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [101]
TigerPulse: 93%
11
|
Not really. Thought he was a good coach before, still think he's a good coach.
1
Mar 23, 2024, 9:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2032]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
1
2
Mar 23, 2024, 10:16 AM
|
|
No. I still have higher aspirations than one NCAAT win in 6 years. And more than one ACCT win in a tournament in 14 years (most years, like this one, none). NM is not a good team and yet the Lobos were favored. House fouls out and Mashburn was 1-11 from the field and 0-6 from 3. Yes, Clemson had something to do with that but the Tigers perimeter D is still suspect. And no one should make a coaching decision based on one game. Still 14 seasons of abject mediocrity, occasional big wins, and way too many bad, embarrassing losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2032]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
Re: Anybody else change their mind about Brownell after tonight?
1
Mar 23, 2024, 10:53 AM
|
|
Did any of the Brownell supporters change their minds after the BC ACCT debacle?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9273]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
Posts: 10832
Joined: 2003
|
Get to Sweet 16 and Ill reconsider. Winning one game
1
2
Mar 23, 2024, 12:40 PM
|
|
in tournament as the higher seed doesn’t correct all shortcomings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 50
| visibility 4212
|
|
|
50
