|
Replies: 52
| visibility 6512
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
22
22
Nov 9, 2024, 8:10 PM
|
|
App State 4-5, 6th in the Sunbelt. Best win 2 pt win vs East Carolina. S Alabama beat them by 34.
NC State 5-5, 14th in ACC. Most recent game double digit loss to Duke at home and Tennessee beat them 51-10 Best win at Cal by 1.
Stanford 2-7 16th in the ACC. Lost 3 games by 30+ points (not us)
Florida State 1-8 17th in the ACC. No further context needed.
Wake Forest 4-5 tied for 10th in the ACC. Best win vs NC State. Lost at home to Ragin Cajuns
UVA 4-4 tied for 10th in the ACC Recently lost to UNC 41-14. Best win is against Boston College (tied for 10th in the ACC too)
Best win so far... Virginia Tech 5-5, 7th in the ACC. Lost to Rutgers at home, best win vs Georgia Tech (6th in the ACC)
I have NO commentary. Everything above is just facts. You interpret this however you want.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rival Killer [3023]
TigerPulse: 87%
33
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
7
7
Nov 9, 2024, 8:17 PM
|
|
I expect the sunshine pumping will return. Most of them will forget about our embarrassing loss to Louisville and the terrible first half against VT since we won.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [897]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
13
13
Nov 9, 2024, 8:20 PM
|
|
W is a W and a L is a L.
Celebrate the Ws!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3331]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 9, 2024, 9:16 PM
|
|
I agree. Had the halves been switched we would have felt much better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1234]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 9, 2024, 8:20 PM
|
|
What would be your conclusion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [31659]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 18188
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
2
Nov 9, 2024, 8:20 PM
|
|
I have every reason to believe Pitt will be 8-1 when we play them next week. I think we need to bring our A game to beat them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1234]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 9, 2024, 8:21 PM
|
|
What is your conclusion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7081]
TigerPulse: 95%
41
|
: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.***
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7081]
TigerPulse: 95%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7081]
TigerPulse: 95%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
This post is not an argument. It is just presenting facts for people to make
Nov 9, 2024, 8:24 PM
[ in reply to Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated. ] |
|
their own conclusions if they want.
I listed every win. I didn't just pick a certain type of win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1069]
TigerPulse: 91%
25
|
This is why under the new system it makes sense
2
Nov 9, 2024, 8:24 PM
|
|
to stay in the ACC. If we have a halfway decent team, we can cruise to the playoff every year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20752]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17339
Joined: 2008
|
Not really. Need tougher competition.
2
Nov 9, 2024, 8:27 PM
|
|
ACC sux!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1619]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Not really. Need tougher competition.
Nov 10, 2024, 8:22 AM
|
|
After what we have seen this year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1144]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: This is why under the new system it makes sense
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:37 PM
[ in reply to This is why under the new system it makes sense ] |
|
Except we won’t cruise at all. Some teams have closed the gap we have enjoyed the past 10 years and others are right behind them. I watched the last game we played in Blacksburg and What A Decline defensively! Offensively we look on par with that KB2 led squad. We NEED more money! Off the ACC doesn’t give it to us we need to leave. We are still Clemson and the country’s best want to play for us but they need an Incentive. Times have changed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1069]
TigerPulse: 91%
25
|
They didnt close the gap. The teams in the ACC
Nov 9, 2024, 9:12 PM
|
|
are terrible. We just regressed back to their level. If we have a decent team, we will be able to cruise through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5953]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: This is why under the new system it makes sense
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:50 PM
[ in reply to This is why under the new system it makes sense ] |
|
It’s not financially feasible to stay in the ACC. You’re right that it provides an easier path to the playoffs, but the money is going to drive the decision if we can overcome the legal battles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1304]
TigerPulse: 95%
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60109]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 61424
Joined: 2007
|
Re: This is why under the new system it makes sense
Nov 9, 2024, 9:07 PM
[ in reply to This is why under the new system it makes sense ] |
|
You can't buy or dream about enough good reason for a FB first Clemson to stay in the ACC bc there isn't one single good reason why a FB first University should stay in a she she FB poor conference, not one reason that could serve as a good reason to stay, and surely not for a weaker path to the playoffs, bc if that's the reason, what will the excuses be that we could never make it to the big game bc the real FB conferences can spend 3 times more money that a she she conference can just to keep a FB first Clemson out bc they clearly saw what a FB first Clemson can do when the money was close to the same, but ESECPN advised a money scheme to assure that doesn't happen anymore, not from the she she ACC!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20752]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17339
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
2
Nov 9, 2024, 8:26 PM
|
|
There is nothing we can do about the schedule except keep winning. Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
Well that applies more when a team wins all their games.
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:28 PM
|
|
If a team loses 2 or 3 games against their toughest opponents then that is a different matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20752]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17339
Joined: 2008
|
How does that apply to all those teams in
Nov 9, 2024, 8:30 PM
|
|
The top 25 with 2 loses? We just need to keep winning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
The way it works is people try to evaluate the quality of wins vs that of losses***
Nov 9, 2024, 8:31 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20752]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17339
Joined: 2008
|
Re: The way it works is people try to evaluate the quality of wins vs that of losses***
Nov 9, 2024, 8:33 PM
|
|
Winning means more to me than comparisons. JMHO. Go Tigers!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
So if Army wins out you put them in the top 3 ahead of all 1-loss teams?***
Nov 9, 2024, 8:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [20752]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17339
Joined: 2008
|
We all know some teams get propped up.
Nov 9, 2024, 8:35 PM
|
|
System is flawed. We are not the greatest but we are also not as bad as some paint it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
Is that a yes or a no?***
Nov 9, 2024, 8:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1304]
TigerPulse: 95%
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28666]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 15991
Joined: 2015
|
D@mn some people can't be happy for a win...
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:28 PM
|
|
Always nitpicking..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
Why do you think the post is negative? I didn't say any opinions about it.
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:29 PM
|
|
You seem to be assuming something is bad about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1392]
TigerPulse: 89%
28
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 9, 2024, 8:44 PM
|
|
BIG YAWN👈literally your narrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
What narrative? I just looked up the records and standings and listed every
Nov 9, 2024, 8:49 PM
|
|
team's best wins and losses. I didn't omit anything or add an opinion. What narrative do you see?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23221]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14104
Joined: 2013
|
VT beat the out of GT in Hoagieland.
Nov 9, 2024, 8:46 PM
|
|
GT did ok today.
🙂
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
I mentioned that VT's best win was against GT.
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:48 PM
|
|
Part of the reason VT is our best win so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2775]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:48 PM
|
|
Glad we won. Honestly thought we would lose and was pleasantly surprised. I will take the win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
Me too. I thought we'd win but maybe not by 10.***
Nov 9, 2024, 8:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4851]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Just thankful were not in a good conference otherwise
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:50 PM
|
|
We would be exposed for what we really are 😬
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60109]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 61424
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
1
Nov 9, 2024, 8:55 PM
|
|
The facts are that what you said is the truth. It's not only the truth, but it's a sad truth bc every team mentioned we probably out talent every one of those teams, and that proves without a doubt that our biggest problem with our team is that our coaches are being out coached on the practice field and in the games. Sad but true, the only way to fix bad coaching is through the coaching portal, Oooops, so we don't have a coaching portal but what we do have is that our athletics program do have enough money that Dabo can go after and bring in some of the best coaching talent in the country. Now I have a question, why in the H&ll hasn't he done that before now, our pants have been falling off for the past 3-4 years now bc we have been getting out butts kicked off by better coaching, bc we're not being out talented!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [392]
TigerPulse: 45%
16
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 9, 2024, 9:03 PM
|
|
In other words we havenot beat a team with a pulse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60109]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 61424
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
1
Nov 9, 2024, 9:37 PM
|
|
We? You must have a biddy in your pocket
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10420]
TigerPulse: 97%
45
Posts: 12950
Joined: 2021
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 9, 2024, 9:05 PM
|
|
Most of us had figured by the time of the Stanford game that FSU was not any longer the feared / high esteem opponent on our schedule.
By the Stanford game, most of figured out that the stretch of LOU, VA Tech, Pitt, and S.Carolina (with Citadel game being when we could rest our injured starters for a week) as each being tougher than any of our pre-Louisville opponents.
Each of these four November opponents are good teams. S.Carolina is more than just the ‘basic’ good team. Not great, but no fooling good.
We should not be emotionally devastated if we lose another game before the bowl. I’m just hoping we can beat Pitt. Then I’ll worry about the yard birds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1776]
TigerPulse: 94%
31
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 9, 2024, 9:37 PM
|
|
Now do Indiana
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28666]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 15991
Joined: 2015
|
BOOM!!!!***
Nov 10, 2024, 3:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [504]
TigerPulse: 94%
19
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 10, 2024, 8:25 AM
|
|
Wrong uva win against pitt is best win
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
That happened after this post was made. Now UVA might be the best win for us.***
Nov 11, 2024, 11:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3415]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 10, 2024, 8:44 AM
|
|
We are the only team that has beaten Va tech by 2 scores this season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23485]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 24239
Joined: 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [-100]
TigerPulse: 52%
-1
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 10, 2024, 8:49 AM
|
|
Also….Vandy upset VT to start the year. 😂😂
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13368]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 16724
Joined: 2010
|
I think we could pay someone $100k/year to get these results.***
Nov 10, 2024, 11:17 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [109]
TigerPulse: 98%
11
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 10, 2024, 12:19 PM
|
|
If we win out than then beat eh hurricanes the season become an unexpected success. Anything less is a disappointment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [109]
TigerPulse: 98%
11
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 10, 2024, 2:06 PM
|
|
If we win out than then beat eh hurricanes the season become an unexpected success. Anything less is a disappointment
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10131]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Clemson's wins re-evaluated.
Nov 10, 2024, 3:38 PM
|
|
No commentary needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 52
| visibility 6512
|
|
|
50
