Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Clemson wants the same thing from the ACC that
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next
Replies: 24
| visibility 2188

Clemson wants the same thing from the ACC that

4

Oct 18, 2024, 11:16 AM
Reply

the SEC and the BIG want from college football - more money.

Clemson wants a bigger share of ACC money because they draw larger TV audiences & revenue and

the BIG and the SEC want a bigger piece of TV money because they draw larger TV audiences and revenue.

Interesting how Clemson fans support the first argument and lamenty the second.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell.

6

Oct 18, 2024, 11:21 AM
Reply

Most fans that I know of either want Clemson out of the ACC... in the SEC or BIG, or, like me, would rather Clemson not become NFL minor league and go back to more of a student-athlete model.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Serious question.

5

Oct 18, 2024, 11:34 AM
Reply

I long for the days where the purpose of an athletic scholarship was to pay for a college education. I long for the days where a kid went to college on a football scholarship and had the attitude, "I get to go to college. My expenses are paid for by the college. And, on top of all that, I GET to play football."

But, those days are gone.

So, my question is this: Assuming there are only two choices (I know there are choices in the middle, but just ignore them for this question) would you prefer Clemson be playing in a conference with UGA or with Furman?

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Furman.

4

Oct 18, 2024, 11:44 AM
Reply

That is what I would prefer if it was between Clemson being part of NFL-lite or student athlete. Give me the non-professional model and the players actually being part of the school.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Furman.

2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:13 PM
Reply

I will ask it a little differently. Would you rather watch JV or Varsity football?

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Neither...

3

Oct 18, 2024, 12:17 PM
Reply

I would rather watch my school play with students that are part of my school. I enjoyed going to school and actually being in classes with some of the athletes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Georgia. 11 times out of 10.******

2
2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:00 PM [ in reply to Serious question. ]
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Serious question.

4

Oct 18, 2024, 12:09 PM [ in reply to Serious question. ]
Reply

Interesting thought, but I don’t think there is an education-funded-only CFB anymore. The more realistic question would whether you would rather watch us play UGA or the likes of Berry in D3?

I recall not that long ago where the Michigan AD (or president, I can’t recall) stated if CFB ever went to pay-for-play, they would opt out and drop to D3. Now that the rubber is meeting the road, I think it is time to call out the lie/hypocrisy. $$$$ > education.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Serious question.

1

Oct 18, 2024, 1:43 PM [ in reply to Serious question. ]
Reply

Dabo already said he would like to play Jawja every year

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

College football has been the NFL minors for decades.

1
3

Oct 18, 2024, 11:59 AM [ in reply to Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell. ]
Reply

The only difference now is that the athletes have more control over their finances and their futures.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

To much control in my opinion.

2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:15 PM
Reply

Entities like what is happening now operate under a contract. There are no contracts right now.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Not sure Id term it too much control, the problem lays with the professional

2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:24 PM
Reply

'leadership' in college sports…the ADs, conference commissioners, school presidents, NCAA, etc…still not wanting to risk their own power so they're not really trying to structure anything. It's an all for one, one for all mentality going on right now. Once they get serious and start talking with athlete leaders on how to best handle all the new changes then college sports could be towards a path of a new normal. Right now it's just the wild wild west.

That's not the players fault, it's the systems fault.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Agree... I wasnt blaming the players for it. They just have too much control.


Oct 18, 2024, 12:35 PM
Reply

Or probably to be more accurately worded... contracts need to be in place for both sides.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


At this point....

3

Oct 18, 2024, 12:03 PM [ in reply to Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell. ]
Reply

if competing at an elite level is the goal, continuing to be more of a student-athlete model is not going to be an option.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Agreed...

2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:16 PM
Reply

I would prefer student-athlete.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Agreed...

2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:32 PM
Reply

I think some of the craziness will sought itself out soon. The Wild West didn't remain the Wild West for long. Laws and rules will have to be applied at some point to NIL, Conference Sceduling, etc. I agree it is not ideal but the constant in life is all things change. Adaptation is the key. Adaptation with a positive plan to make positive changes is an ideal.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Me too, but I think that ship has sailed.***

1

Oct 18, 2024, 1:15 PM [ in reply to Agreed... ]
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sometimes good things fall apart so better things can fall together.


Yeah... I dont see how we could go back now. It is just what I would do


Oct 18, 2024, 1:20 PM
Reply

if i could wave a magic wand.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell.

2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:12 PM [ in reply to Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell. ]
Reply

Sometimes you have to play the hand you are dealt, and if it isn't any good, then you have to try and bluff your way to getting what you want. This is us right now...

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell.

2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:30 PM [ in reply to Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell. ]
Reply

joetigerny said:

Most fans that I know of either want Clemson out of the ACC... in the SEC or BIG, or, like me, would rather Clemson not become NFL minor league and go back to more of a student-athlete model.


Some interesting takes on your take. My take is that I agree with you.
Would rather see Clemson in the Big 10(1st) or SEC(2nd) rather than in the ACC. Kids will literally leave because they want to play in one of those conferences. But, even in the day/age of NIL - if you watch these SBC teams - they all have plenty of transfers that came from SEC or Big 10 schools.
I still would like to see Clemson compete for National Championships; but realize that ability is going to be harder the way things sit now.

That said, can Clemson with a much smaller alumni base than the Northern schools in the Big 10 and far less Oil big money than the Texas schools: can Clemson compete no matter what our model is?

Depending on how revenue sharing goes and Capping and the like: it will never be equal. Even then, people are likely to just go back to paying under the table if they need to attract talent by going above the Cap.

Would rather it go back to a more Student 1st - athletics 2nd model if I had to choose. But, that horse has left the barn and isn't coming back.

Moving forward - what is the best way for Clemson to suceed in the New CFB world order?

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell.

2

Oct 18, 2024, 12:31 PM [ in reply to Ummm... you are pretty wrong from what I can tell. ]
Reply

The old model is gone and it's time that Dabo and Clemson fans realize it's about money and winning.Nothing else.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Nah, I dont think it is gone...

1

Oct 18, 2024, 12:41 PM
Reply

Just at a different level. I think that there is a scale of how much do you care about Clemson vs how much do you care about Clemson football... I care way more about Clemson. The older I get, the more I care about Clemson and the less I care about only the football side of Clemson. Thus, where I land is giving up the professionalism and going back to student-athlete model. I understand it would probably take a drop in division to do that... and I am good with that.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Nah, I dont think it is gone...

1

Oct 18, 2024, 1:26 PM
Reply

Joe, as much as I would like to agree with you because I do love Clemson, I also wants us to compete at the highest level in all athletics and every endeavor we as a university do.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

My frustration is it would only be the best athletes that we can pay for...

1

Oct 18, 2024, 1:39 PM
Reply

Not actual students. Are semi-pro athletes even really a part of the university.

I want us to do the best we possibly can as well... just with students that actually go to Clemson, not just hired athletes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Clemson wants the same thing from the ACC that

1

Oct 18, 2024, 3:22 PM
Reply


the SEC and the BIG want from college football - more money.

Clemson wants a bigger share of ACC money because they draw larger TV audiences & revenue and

the BIG and the SEC want a bigger piece of TV money because they draw larger TV audiences and revenue.

Interesting how Clemson fans support the first argument and lamenty the second.




Seems you misunderstand the situation. Clemson wants a level playing field as we won't be competitive in the long-term making $30M+ less than the teams in the Big 2. If the ACC did what was required to create a competitive landscape, my guess is Clemson would stay.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 24
| visibility 2188
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next