Replies: 138
| visibility 2302
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 7:38 PM
|
|
breaking news i just got from a source. cant say who it is of course but it is someone not very many notches down from president barker. this has been in the works and something could very well be announced before the first of the year. it will be the biggest news for clemson maybe ever. keep your fingers and toes crossed guys.
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23659]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 20074
Joined: 2011
|
You're probably joking, BUT
Nov 26, 2012, 7:40 PM
|
|
this one conference move I'd support.
|
|
|
|
|
Member [29]
TigerPulse: 31%
3
|
i say we just go to the sun belt its a win win***
Nov 30, 2012, 11:30 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 7:40 PM
|
|
Not sure if Sarcasm or serious :/
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3761]
TigerPulse: 79%
35
|
Sorry, but that will NEVER HAPPEN.
Nov 26, 2012, 9:20 PM
|
|
The SEC has made it clear it has no interst in Clemson. It would rather have NC State because they already have one team from this state.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1346]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 7:40 PM
|
|
Don't know you or your 'insider', but I'll put it in the hearsay box for right now. That chance came and went once already didn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 86%
4
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 7:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
Re: You don't usually bs but I am going to stay out of this.***
Nov 26, 2012, 7:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1895]
TigerPulse: 74%
31
|
Has york confirmed this?
Nov 26, 2012, 7:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [864]
TigerPulse: 93%
23
|
Member since 1998
Nov 26, 2012, 7:46 PM
|
|
Hmmm
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [96665]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 47370
Joined: 2009
|
If to SEC..do we "have to" play the #####?! Ha, of course!
Nov 26, 2012, 7:49 PM
|
|
Goodie, since we will be making $5 million or more a year and have the money to do some of the things they've done to get ahead of the ACC Curve!
GoTiGERs..alway!
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [942]
TigerPulse: 59%
24
|
Of course...wink...wink.***
Nov 26, 2012, 7:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 7:48 PM
|
|
"LMAO where do some of you people come up with this crap."
Sound familiar, derp?
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
Re: I think the old boy is just having a little fun with
Nov 26, 2012, 7:50 PM
|
|
York and a few others
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1626]
TigerPulse: 95%
31
|
Re: Member since 1998
Nov 26, 2012, 7:49 PM
|
|
This! Why would a longtime member bs like that ya know Im nibbleing on the bait.
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [201]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 7:51 PM
|
|
i will tie my weenie in a knot if that will help
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [3]
TigerPulse: 81%
1
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 7:55 PM
|
|
We don't need to go to the sec to be good, I would say go to the big 10 or the big 12
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [10]
TigerPulse: 17%
2
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 9:59 PM
|
|
sec yeah right you dont deserve the SEC.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1952]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 10:06 PM
|
|
just be another bottom feeder right above the coots
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2841]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 27, 2012, 12:09 AM
[ in reply to Re: CLEMSON TO SEC ] |
|
And you do? Because your program has done SOO much to help the SEC's football product.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10805]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 13222
Joined: 2003
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 28, 2012, 2:55 PM
[ in reply to Re: CLEMSON TO SEC ] |
|
That is the funniest thing I have ever heard. Please tell me what your joke of a program has done in their 20 years there? 1, and I stress 1, SEC Least title. Sorry man I forgot about the follow up with those awesome 5th,6th,14th whatever place rings they were. I'll bet you money if the SEC could go back and had a choice between your joke of a program and our tigers,you clowns would be in the Big East right now. Reason being you don't deserve the ACC and they wouldn't have your pathetic arses. Keep on sporting that SEC flag though if it makes you feel relevant. Everybody in the nation knows you are not though. Now get off the bosses computer and deliver that pizza that is getting cold coot.
|
|
|
|
|
Devotee [326]
TigerPulse: 64%
15
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 30, 2012, 12:12 PM
[ in reply to Re: CLEMSON TO SEC ] |
|
But you did "deserve" some shiny nice 5th place rings. Stay classy coot!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 30, 2012, 2:17 PM
[ in reply to Re: CLEMSON TO SEC ] |
|
seriously? coming from USuCk??/bwahahahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
If true, most of the east is pissing themselves.
Nov 26, 2012, 7:55 PM
|
|
All they have to sell is their conference, which means us in the SEC East only leaves Fla and UGA to contest with. I'd also think FSU would be envolved, so add them, too.
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [2]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: If true, most of the east is pissing themselves.
Nov 26, 2012, 7:58 PM
|
|
Pissing themselves with anticipation...We just got beat for the fourth time in a row by the third best team in the east, with their backup quarterback and third team running back
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1262]
TigerPulse: 91%
27
|
Re: If true, most of the east is pissing themselves.
Nov 26, 2012, 8:02 PM
|
|
The coots don't want us in the SEC because they know we would absolutely smash them in recruiting. We are doing a good job now,but if we were in the SEC we would be at the top recruiting with our advantage of campus over them.
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [91]
TigerPulse: 18%
10
|
Re: If true, most of the east is pissing themselves.
Nov 29, 2012, 1:52 PM
|
|
> The coots don't want us in the SEC because they know > we would absolutely smash them in recruiting. We are > doing a good job now,but if we were in the SEC we > would be at the top recruiting with our advantage of > campus over them.
Gawd! How out of touch you are. REAL football players don't give a #@$% about the view of the Blue Ridge Mountains on a clear day - besides, they're just hills filled with dentally challenged white people.
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4795]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
I lived in Columbia for two years.
Nov 29, 2012, 10:45 PM
|
|
I'll take the hillbillies any day over the cesspool the ##### call home.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6694]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
Posts: 11170
Joined: 2007
|
Maybe "REAL" football players don't want to go to jail?
Dec 19, 2012, 12:16 PM
[ in reply to Re: If true, most of the east is pissing themselves. ] |
|
Maybe they don't want to be in a concrete jungle? Maybe they don't like doo-doo ice? Maybe they don't like playing for an ole ball sack?
Maybe they don't want to say "I'm going to be a ####!!"
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Yeah, that's what Tenn, Vandy, Kentucky, and so on is doing.
Nov 26, 2012, 8:05 PM
[ in reply to Re: If true, most of the east is pissing themselves. ] |
|
Look at our weaknesses on D going into this year vs our LB play and improvement. To say our Dline coaches and Cheese aren't going to get their year next and beyond is just ignorant.
Bet So Car don't want to see Chad use the short passing game and I can't see why he didn't for the life of me. Also, I still think if certain penalties were called correctly we wouldn't be having such discussions.
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [70]
TigerPulse: 87%
8
|
Re: Yeah, that's what Tenn, Vandy, Kentucky, and so on is doing.
Nov 26, 2012, 10:18 PM
|
|
I never reply. However, this is the most incomprehensible post in five years of looking at the boards. Please have less party time when you get online.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
It's obvious why you don't reply often.
Nov 27, 2012, 12:19 AM
|
|
Next time you do decide to reply have some with a brain hold your hand & coach you through it, ok?
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
someone***
Nov 27, 2012, 12:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [228]
TigerPulse: 50%
13
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
lol...you must have got what I was saying in that there
Nov 27, 2012, 12:23 AM
|
|
are only 2 schools (FLA & UGA) that we would truly have to battle on the field and in recruiting in the SEC East, should we be in the SEC East. Unlike a certain poster above.
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [72]
TigerPulse: 27%
8
|
Re: If true, most of the east is pissing themselves.
Nov 26, 2012, 9:06 PM
[ in reply to If true, most of the east is pissing themselves. ] |
|
> All they have to sell is their conference, which > means us in the SEC East only leaves Fla and UGA to > contest with. I'd also think FSU would be envolved, > so add them, too.
obbious idiot. you can't even beat your rival.
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [71]
TigerPulse: 51%
8
|
But...but...what about ACADEMICS? What about our
Nov 26, 2012, 8:00 PM
|
|
core mission? What about championships? Isn't that most important?
I said it last year- I'm tired of playing Duke, Mary, Wake. I would crawl over broken glass to see UGA, UT, UF, USC, AUB, etc every year.
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23659]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 20074
Joined: 2011
|
If True ^^^ we'd have to admit those
Nov 26, 2012, 8:13 PM
|
|
that meet the NCAA minimum. I'd never advocate oversigning, pulling scollies or recruiting thugs, but there's nothing wrong with admitting athletes that meet the NCAA set requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23802]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 15384
Joined: 2004
|
Great ! Another York Tiger wannabe!***
Nov 26, 2012, 8:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [721]
TigerPulse: 75%
22
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:04 PM
|
|
Dreamer
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1045]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Coot Alert....Coot Troll on the board...Coot Alert
Nov 26, 2012, 8:09 PM
|
|
Obvious troll started this thread!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1898]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Baloney! droberts is a great
Nov 29, 2012, 3:58 PM
|
|
Tiger. Goes back eons on this board. That said he is full of baloney on this too. lol
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Coot Alert....Coot Troll on the board...Coot Alert
Nov 29, 2012, 4:01 PM
[ in reply to Coot Alert....Coot Troll on the board...Coot Alert ] |
|
yep that is me, a coot. i have missed less than 10 games, home and away since 1980. can you say that troll. i am guessing you dont even have season tickets.
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [382]
TigerPulse: 90%
16
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:09 PM
|
|
LMAO...They already have a market in this area...But Va. and NC will be a sure possibility...
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1160]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Maybe this is why Morris would
Nov 26, 2012, 8:27 PM
|
|
Consider going to NC State. Clemson may not be playing them anymore.
TDP stepping aside, new AD hired... Things that make you go hmmm....
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [586]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Deer Lowered!***
Nov 26, 2012, 8:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member [29]
TigerPulse: 36%
3
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:31 PM
|
|
Chances are nil to none.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:32 PM
|
|
hey listen you guys can believe what you want to believe. i know what is true.
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21238]
TigerPulse: 85%
53
Posts: 18026
Joined: 2007
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:41 PM
|
|
We all know you're trying to prove a point.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:43 PM
|
|
yep you have always been one you just could not fool. sit back and watch.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
46
Posts: 14500
Joined: 2011
|
Will believe it when I see it***
Nov 26, 2012, 9:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2196]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Well, why would we have to cross our fingers and toes?***
Nov 26, 2012, 10:59 PM
[ in reply to Re: CLEMSON TO SEC ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [94]
TigerPulse: 68%
10
|
Re: Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:33 PM
|
|
One can certainly hope though!
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12666]
TigerPulse: 86%
47
Posts: 12291
Joined: 2011
|
I started to really laugh this post off the board, but you
Nov 26, 2012, 8:37 PM
|
|
have been around this board a while and, as I remember, you are pretty much no-nonsense. I hope your source is right.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5713]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
I heard the same. Us and FSU to the SEC..............
Nov 26, 2012, 8:39 PM
|
|
is one reason Maryland bolted to the Big 10. ACC is about to implode.
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Lol you goobers take the cake.***
Nov 26, 2012, 8:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13230]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 16605
Joined: 2010
|
I would fully support this move. But I think you're FOS***
Nov 26, 2012, 8:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [201]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:42 PM
|
|
look, I have known derob for a long time. he doesn't say much, but when he does I pay attention. you should too.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2435]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:53 PM
|
|
He drinks Dos Equis.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:54 PM
|
|
stay thirsty my friend
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7109]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
This can't be true
Nov 26, 2012, 8:46 PM
|
|
because I heard we were starting the F.O.S conference.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1714]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 8:47 PM
|
|
Will we have to chant "SEC SEC"? Can we chant ACC? Lol, that would #### off "The Man"
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 12938
Joined: 2012
|
This is definetly true guys...
Nov 26, 2012, 8:50 PM
|
|
I saw 'SEC' in my speghetti O's. Ok, maybe it was 'ACC' but that's basically the same right?
Jk, would be awesome but I'm pretty tired of rumored this and rumored that. No offense to deroberts, just don't believe anything about conference alignment until its actually happening.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12666]
TigerPulse: 86%
47
Posts: 12291
Joined: 2011
|
On second thought, I tink you got me. I think this is a big
Nov 26, 2012, 8:53 PM
|
|
Joke. Good one though.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1714]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Dangit
Nov 26, 2012, 9:00 PM
|
|
I know we would take a hit initially playing in that conference but I salivate at what we could accomplish with the rabid support of ESecPN and the cash flow from vastly superior contracts. I don't know if I want to be in the SEC or if I want Slive and Swoffie to trade jobs.
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [661]
TigerPulse: 86%
21
|
I'll buy/join iptay and season tickets tomorrow
Nov 26, 2012, 9:01 PM
|
|
If true. But in my perfect world the ACC would work out and be better than SEC but that ain't happening
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Legend [145422]
TigerPulse: 100%
67
Posts: 34625
Joined: 2010
|
I hope it's true... I want to see this guy buy IPTAY!***
Nov 26, 2012, 9:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1125]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
We need somebody to buy Iptay to cover the $50 mil exit fee.
Nov 26, 2012, 10:21 PM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Legend [145422]
TigerPulse: 100%
67
Posts: 34625
Joined: 2010
|
Germans. This was reported on ESPN over a year ago.
Nov 26, 2012, 9:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6101]
TigerPulse: 85%
40
Posts: 10117
Joined: 2011
|
This can only mean one thing
Nov 26, 2012, 9:18 PM
|
|
Lots of love from ESPN and now we can run around bragging about our awesome conference!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2991]
TigerPulse: 96%
33
|
Honestly, how will that change anything? We'll
Nov 26, 2012, 9:22 PM
|
|
still have the same school, same fans, same system, same program.
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [30]
TigerPulse: 98%
4
|
Re: Honestly, how will that change anything? We'll
Nov 26, 2012, 9:27 PM
|
|
I know a guy who is a member of the dude from west Virgina's family and saw him over the holidays, clemson is a lock for the big 12
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13230]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 16605
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [94]
TigerPulse: 68%
10
|
Re: Honestly, how will that change anything? We'll
Nov 26, 2012, 9:25 PM
|
|
Iron sharpens iron...
|
|
|
|
|
Follower [278]
TigerPulse: 98%
14
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 9:26 PM
|
|
Clemson isn't going anywhere. SEC has no interest in Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [580]
TigerPulse: 25%
20
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 9:29 PM
|
|
hehehehehehehehehehe.
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3308]
TigerPulse: 97%
34
|
YOU are a joke.***
Nov 26, 2012, 9:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3258]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
dero speaks truth....SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC***
Nov 26, 2012, 9:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2438]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Man we're fast now, but once we have SEC SPEED....;)***
Nov 26, 2012, 9:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [94]
TigerPulse: 68%
10
|
Re: Man we're fast now, but once we have SEC SPEED....;)***
Nov 26, 2012, 9:55 PM
|
|
Lolz
|
|
|
|
|
Redshirt [98]
TigerPulse: 72%
10
|
Re: Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 10:12 PM
|
|
Might need to beat them first
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8013]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
If so, do we have to chant S E C, S E C at every game?***
Nov 26, 2012, 10:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [661]
TigerPulse: 86%
21
|
Re: I hope it's true... I want to see this guy buy IPTAY!***
Nov 26, 2012, 10:28 PM
|
|
Ha!
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [591]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 10:39 PM
|
|
I have become obsessed with this board about expansion and pray that we end up in the SEC. If this was to come to pass it would be the best Christmas present ever.
From a Mom who has a junior at Clemson
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 14%
1
|
Do y'all really
Nov 26, 2012, 11:17 PM
|
|
believe this? It's not going to happen...period. People with sources higher in the SEC (at least higher than a couple of rungs down the ladder from the CU President) have been very clear there will be NO EXPANSION in states with an SEC school. I know you've heard this but that means CU, FSU, GT, and UL will not get in the SEC unless the SEC school in their state leaves.
UNC/NCST and UVA/VT are virtual locks for the SEC when it goes to 16 schools in 2014. I would jump at any offer the BIG 12 makes ASAP.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
I don't think it will happen.
Nov 26, 2012, 11:21 PM
|
|
But I do think it would make business sense. Adding Clemson and FSU would solidify the SEC against the Big 12 for decades.
The SEC would truly be the Southeastern Conference and the Big 12 would have no foot print in it.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
And it would kill the ACC. Thus, strengthening the SEC.***
Nov 26, 2012, 11:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [580]
TigerPulse: 25%
20
|
Expansion has never been about recruiting. It has been only
Nov 26, 2012, 11:27 PM
[ in reply to I don't think it will happen. ] |
|
about money. With the coming SEC Network, the SEC would leverage that by getting into non-SEC markets. And in this stagnant economy, the money angle regarding expansion intensifies the desire and need to expand into new markets.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
I didn't say anything about recruiting.
Nov 26, 2012, 11:29 PM
|
|
I'm talking about the strength of the SEC as a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [580]
TigerPulse: 25%
20
|
Money is strength in business, politics, government and
Nov 26, 2012, 11:30 PM
|
|
sports.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3989]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [0]
TigerPulse: 14%
1
|
Re: I don't think it will happen.
Nov 26, 2012, 11:36 PM
[ in reply to I don't think it will happen. ] |
|
I agree 100%. It makes sense from a culture point of view also. CU and FSU would be a great fit in the SEC but it's just not going to happen due to economics. No TV sets would be added in that scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [65]
TigerPulse: 26%
7
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1904]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 11:32 PM
|
|
SEC: East: Clemson FSU UGA Kentucky South Carolina Florida Vanderbilt Tennessee
West: Bama LSU Auburn Mzzou ATM Arky Ole Miss Miss State
Clemson Schedule- 1. SC STATE (OOC CUPCAKE) 2. UGA (DIV) 3. FSU (DIV) 4. VANDY (DIV) 5. AUBURN (CROSS DIV RIVALRY) 6. BYE 7. FLORIDA (DIV) 8. TENNESSEE (DIV) 9. KENTUCKY (DIV) 10. GT (OOC RIVAL) 11. THE CITIDAL (OOC CUPCAKE) 12. SOUTH CAROLINA (DIV RIVAL) 13. CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP 14. BOWL
Yeah, maybe I'm dreaming. But that's all we can do for now.
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [510]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
I will believe it when I see it
Nov 26, 2012, 11:33 PM
|
|
Now, I would crawl over broken glass to join the SEC, but I don't think they need us.
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [942]
TigerPulse: 59%
24
|
You get it. The SEC does NOT need us.
Nov 26, 2012, 11:42 PM
|
|
I don't know why some of our fans keep bringing up going to the SEC. It only causes heartbreak, needlessly. From a business standpoint, it makes no sense. You know the adage about it not being personal, only busines? It applies here.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
52
Posts: 22266
Joined: 2004
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 11:40 PM
|
|
God you are such a goober herp derp.
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [126]
TigerPulse: 24%
11
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 26, 2012, 11:44 PM
|
|
Oh please!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [1]
TigerPulse: 50%
1
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 27, 2012, 12:14 AM
|
|
The SEC doesn't want you. Keep dreaming.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2841]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 27, 2012, 12:17 AM
|
|
The SEC didn't want you all those years ago either but they took you anyways. Nobody wants the adopted, pale ginger kid but y'all have managed to turn into Carrot Top with all that SEC money.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10805]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 13222
Joined: 2003
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 10:37 AM
[ in reply to Re: CLEMSON TO SEC ] |
|
They don't want you clowns either but are simply stuck with you. Kinda of like when you marry someone.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2841]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 27, 2012, 12:15 AM
|
|
This looks like clear sarcasm to me. I think we either need to get to the Big 12 or just be content with being irrelevant by 2025. The ACC is falling apart, as long as Swofford is the commish and he tries adding basketball schools every time we will continue to get screwed.
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [659]
TigerPulse: 99%
21
|
You've created a MONSTER....
Nov 27, 2012, 12:21 AM
|
|
...of a thread. Ingenious lol
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21238]
TigerPulse: 85%
53
Posts: 18026
Joined: 2007
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 27, 2012, 10:55 AM
|
|
After sleeping on it last night, I still think you're being fecetious.
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [125]
TigerPulse: 87%
11
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 28, 2012, 2:35 PM
|
|
guess this rumor got squashed today with the addition of L'ville
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 28, 2012, 3:01 PM
|
|
patience grasshopper
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [125]
TigerPulse: 87%
11
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 10:43 AM
|
|
ok, so say i take your bait, did your source say who is coming with Clemson?
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 10:49 AM
|
|
nope as always we are more worried about clemsons future than others.
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [125]
TigerPulse: 87%
11
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 11:06 AM
|
|
If both parties have already agreed, why would they wait to announce. Seems like they would just go ahead and do it now.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8013]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 11:16 AM
|
|
As much as I would like for this to be true, I think the OP is just yanking chains.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14661]
TigerPulse: 80%
49
Posts: 23153
Joined: 1998
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 11:17 AM
|
|
op is at depaul
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2609]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 10:27 AM
|
|
This BS from a USuCk Chicken who thinks hes funny
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7980]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 22418
Joined: 2002
|
A T-mail from York is hardly a source***
Nov 29, 2012, 11:20 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22966]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 25003
Joined: 1999
|
The Security and Exchange Commission???***
Nov 29, 2012, 11:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10105]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 16938
Joined: 2001
|
International Conference***
Nov 29, 2012, 11:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2585]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC......where do I send my check ?
Nov 29, 2012, 11:34 AM
|
|
" All In " on this move.
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [65]
TigerPulse: 26%
7
|
It will NEVER happen. They want bigger market****
Nov 29, 2012, 1:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [536]
TigerPulse: 100%
19
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 2:10 PM
|
|
I call bullcrap. M Did anyone even read the comments on the front page from Wilkins?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10805]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 13222
Joined: 2003
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 2:58 PM
|
|
Maybe he is excited to get a team to replace us after we leave.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2929]
TigerPulse: 98%
33
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 2:30 PM
|
|
I just went from 6 to midnight
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5713]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Spurrier and USuC will never allow it***************
Nov 29, 2012, 3:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10805]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 13222
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Spurrier and USuC will never allow it***************
Nov 29, 2012, 4:58 PM
|
|
F*** Spurrier and F*** Suck U.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41658]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43343
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [9]
TigerPulse: 22%
1
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 5:08 PM
|
|
I heard this too. It's been confirmed via multiple outlets.
I've also heard since the cat was let out of the bag (hardy har har), the deal is now off. All Clemson fan ire should be directed at deroberts for the years of ACC torture to come.
Way to go, man... way to go.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10805]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 13222
Joined: 2003
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 29, 2012, 5:11 PM
|
|
I wish somebody would let the coots out. Way too much chicken #### on the floor around here. My ignore button is worn out and I have a new one on order. Hope it gets here soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [225]
TigerPulse: 75%
13
|
OK, like many of you, I too was surprised by this post and
Nov 29, 2012, 10:38 PM
|
|
thought it was BS. However, from many past posts I have come to respect deroberts' opinions and, I thought, what if there IS something going on and how could it possibly come to fruition?
So my thoughts started with the common belief the SEC wants a major presence in the NC/VA media markets and that UNC is the big prize they want and need to hit an expansion home run and not just settle for leftovers. So, what have we heard or what can logically be surmised for this plan to be realized?
Other blogs have asserted that for UNC to consider a conference jump they will want a package deal with Duke. Supposedly, this is a sticky point with the B1G as their model desires big state univ's unless your initials are ND.
From my experience of living in Virginia for 5 years, I believe UVA will NOT go to the SEC and will prefer the B1G if the ACC fractures any further. This is due to academic and cultural snobbery, B1G money and linkage to the NE markets UVA adores - but mostly the snobbery.
I think the SEC would like a UNC/Duke package as #'s 15 & 16. Not only would this lockup the NC market, the addition of Duke would be a HUGE boost to the SEC's academic ego - which could use a boost. To access VA markets would require further expansion with VA Tech the only option as #17.
Who then is left for #18 and who would be driving the selection? My take is UNC is the driver and they will influence the choice to be someone that can, potentially, fall under the UNC/Duke 'sphere of influence'. UNC will not just jump ship to a new conference without a grouping that gives them influence in the new family. The SEC would balk at a 3rd NC school and FSU would more likely link to Bama than UNC/Duke. CU would be a good link geographically, academically and retain rivalries for UNC/Duke/VA Tech. The SEC would get 2 of the 3 top FB teams and the two best BB teams in the ACC with dominating presence in the Carolinas and a strong VA/DC play - a Grand Slam!
Anyway, that's how I could see CU as #18.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18210]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22449
Joined: 1999
|
Re: OK, like many of you, I too was surprised by this post and
Nov 30, 2012, 11:44 AM
|
|
I like your take on UNC/Puke sticking together. I disagree with your conclusion on the matter, though. My guess is if UNC won't go without Puke, the SEC would say, no deal. THAT would be why Clemson is then an attractive option. Maybe they finally realized it's in their best interest to go for the most SEC-like teams available. That would be Clemson and FSU. Possibly VT. I certainly don't think the SEC is wanting to go to 18 teams. If they're looking to expand to 16 and they won't accept UNC's terms, I could see the door open to Clemson and FSU.
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23002]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
pic?***
Nov 29, 2012, 10:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [54]
TigerPulse: 18%
6
|
You would be fined for going on the field after games.
Nov 30, 2012, 1:19 AM
|
|
SEC rule.
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24892]
TigerPulse: 94%
54
Posts: 17252
Joined: 2002
|
Well, that is certainly a fly in the ointment.
Nov 30, 2012, 10:44 AM
|
|
coots lol
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3710]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
I am leary of going to the SEC...
Nov 30, 2012, 7:51 AM
|
|
With both FL and Ky in top ten of BBall, it might be to much of a BBall conference for me, LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1080]
TigerPulse: 76%
25
|
Re: Deroberts, I know your posts are pretty straightforward
Nov 30, 2012, 9:19 AM
|
|
...but for someone like myself who is so sick of the ACC and ready to get out..I'm kind of tired of getting jerked around with these kind of posts. I'm not sayin that is what your doing but could you shed some light on this? Is this really legit? When might there be an announcement? That is all..
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [125]
TigerPulse: 87%
11
|
Re: Deroberts, I know your posts are pretty straightforward
Nov 30, 2012, 10:24 AM
|
|
dont get your hopes up heavyduty. Its not happening. If someone close to the situation really told deroberts we were SEC bound i dont think he would be announcing it on tigernet.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18210]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 22449
Joined: 1999
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2293]
TigerPulse: 95%
32
|
Re: Deroberts, I know your posts are pretty straightforward
Nov 30, 2012, 2:21 PM
|
|
> "Is it really legit?" > > Um, didn't he say in the OP that he had a legit > source? You want him to repeat his OP, or what?
I just wanted to hear some follow-up on it smartass.
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [422]
TigerPulse: 98%
17
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 30, 2012, 9:24 AM
|
|
I'm being super serial guys!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2293]
TigerPulse: 95%
32
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Nov 30, 2012, 10:48 AM
|
|
> breaking news i just got from a source. cant say who > it is of course but it is someone not very many > notches down from president barker. this has been in > the works and something could very well be announced > before the first of the year. it will be the biggest > news for clemson maybe ever. keep your fingers and > toes crossed guys.
So Deroberts.....does your statement still hold water or was this a premature statement that was hastily made before thinking it through? Not poking at you....being serious. Just wondering if there is anymore meat to this or is it still speculation?
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [727]
TigerPulse: 100%
22
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Dec 19, 2012, 11:27 AM
|
|
it's getting closer.........we're still in the ACC........just wondering if you have wiped the egg off your face yet...lol
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [39]
TigerPulse: 17%
4
|
Re: CLEMSON TO SEC
Dec 19, 2012, 11:33 AM
|
|
Not going to happen. Wishful thinking!
|
|
|
|
Replies: 138
| visibility 2302
|
|
|