|
Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
|
Replies: 58
| visibility 10374
|
Starter [257]
TigerPulse: 77%
14
|
Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
7
9
7
9
Nov 16, 2024, 7:48 PM
|
|
Seriously, they’re better than we are now. How the he// did that happen?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20745]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 17338
Joined: 2008
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
3
Nov 16, 2024, 7:48 PM
|
|
I doubt it. SEC bias is in play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8109]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 10:08 PM
|
|
What makes you think that they’re better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3359]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
4
Nov 16, 2024, 7:50 PM
|
|
SEC money
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10129]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
8
8
Nov 16, 2024, 7:50 PM
|
|
Apathy and hardheadness
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1113]
TigerPulse: 93%
26
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
4
Nov 16, 2024, 7:50 PM
|
|
Guess we’ll find out in two weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [3049]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 7:52 PM
|
|
That’s what I am afraid of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [228]
TigerPulse: 74%
13
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
1
Nov 16, 2024, 7:51 PM
|
|
Ummm who have they beaten this year that's so good?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [861]
TigerPulse: 65%
23
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
4
Nov 16, 2024, 7:52 PM
|
|
Dude don't ask that ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2108]
TigerPulse: 95%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [228]
TigerPulse: 74%
13
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 8:00 PM
|
|
What teams are better? Oklahoma definitely not. And as far as Missouri and Texas A&M before they joined the SEC nobody ever talked about them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1401]
TigerPulse: 87%
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [570]
TigerPulse: 99%
20
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 7:51 PM
|
|
Kept improving each week. Missouri let Carolina drive 70 yards in 55 seconds. Had Missouri been smart they would have slid at the one and used up most of the time but scored too quick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8989]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10678
Joined: 2003
|
All I hear is how Sellers sucks. He had 5 TD passes
1
Nov 16, 2024, 7:51 PM
|
|
tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [79]
TigerPulse: 95%
8
|
Re: All I hear is how Sellers sucks. He had 5 TD passes
Nov 16, 2024, 8:07 PM
|
|
Maybe Missouri sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2165]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 7:51 PM
|
|
They're hot right now...playing well together but they are also willing to portal and buy players. See Sanders and Stewart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1301]
TigerPulse: 95%
28
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
8
8
Nov 16, 2024, 7:51 PM
|
|
They’re using everything legally available to them to try to win (transfer portal, NIL, etc).
We’re not…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [79]
TigerPulse: 95%
8
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 8:12 PM
|
|
Plus about 7 million dollars more probably helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [240]
TigerPulse: 93%
13
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 12:23 AM
|
|
If Clemson had the extra 7 million what would they do with it to become competitive?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6882]
TigerPulse: 95%
41
|
look at TNET people. they think the PITT game was game
2
Nov 16, 2024, 7:52 PM
|
|
and are literally Thumbs Downing my post critiquing our game today
Clemson fans did it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22867]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
|
Re: look at TNET people. they think the PITT game was game
2
Nov 16, 2024, 7:53 PM
|
|
😭
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [861]
TigerPulse: 65%
23
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 7:52 PM
|
|
Because they adapted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9558]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
3
Nov 16, 2024, 7:53 PM
|
|
Lol go away coot
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [265]
TigerPulse: 98%
14
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 7:55 PM
|
|
The get the WRs open.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1084]
TigerPulse: 78%
25
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
2
Nov 16, 2024, 7:57 PM
|
|
The one and only reason they have a better is because they do what we won’t and that’s use the portal for better players and use NIL money to buy HS players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11848]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 10:02 PM
|
|
Yep …… they use the portal just like the Seminoles. They have used the portal because they had to and in their case have hit on some good players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2192]
TigerPulse: 95%
32
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 7:58 PM
|
|
I heard they have 32 seniors to our 6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5591]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 9:35 PM
|
|
i think it is 36 seniors...they use the portal ..
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7947]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 15878
Joined: 2001
|
And next year they will have probably 30- to our 15
Nov 16, 2024, 10:10 PM
|
|
As they will go back to the portal - will it work? - crapshoot - didn’t for FSU this year but who knows - if Sellars, Stewart and Harbor stick with them that’s a good core though and they have recruited some good young OL. Plus more guys will be looking there way after this season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2427]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Do you not think we're better than Missouri?***
Nov 16, 2024, 8:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2192]
TigerPulse: 95%
32
|
Re: Do you not think we're better than Missouri?***
Nov 17, 2024, 1:04 PM
|
|
Before that game I said we compared to Missou but I think they're a more improved team than us now. Especially with the injuries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13651]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 14824
Joined: 2010
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
2
4
Nov 16, 2024, 8:06 PM
|
|
We only hire friends of 90's Alabama football and family.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1608]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
2
Nov 16, 2024, 8:06 PM
|
|
I posted this couple weeks ago. Go look at the roster for South Carolina. Make sure you look at the picture roster. Compare that to the Clemson roster, including our walk on and such. Physically, they are incredibly way ahead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4717]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 9:47 PM
|
|
Remember 2015-2019 when we were called Godzilla?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12560]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 12:58 AM
[ in reply to Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson? ] |
|
Start with 1 pound of psychedelic mushrooms, sprinkle liberally with PCP, gently blend in 1oz of LSD. Don’t eat for 3 days, then serve to all of your unemployed coot friends. Now call Finebaum and tell him everything on your collective minds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6613]
TigerPulse: 96%
41
|
SEC $ and actually using the portal***
1
Nov 16, 2024, 8:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1354]
TigerPulse: 88%
28
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 8:08 PM
|
|
LOL, no they're not
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4639]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 8:22 PM
|
|
6th year seniors are usually ahead of freshman
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [894]
TigerPulse: 100%
23
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 9:45 PM
|
|
They are not—-you will see
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [220]
TigerPulse: 52%
13
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 9:58 PM
|
|
Recruiting guys that's we won't and the transfer portal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5908]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 10:01 PM
|
|
Liberal use of the portal. It can bring success for a short time, but it’s not building a culture. Let’s see what they look like next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2630]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
This board gets dumber every day***
Nov 16, 2024, 10:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8570]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 11455
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 10:07 PM
|
|
Did I miss the game? I thought Clemson is scheduled to play SCAR on November 30th. We will determine which team is better on that day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1029]
TigerPulse: 99%
25
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 16, 2024, 10:53 PM
|
|
It didn’t. You are deceived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2736]
TigerPulse: 92%
33
|
I dunno - I have a bad feeling
Nov 16, 2024, 11:23 PM
|
|
This might be the turning point in the 2 programs. I just can’t help but think about the differences in quality between the two programs. The SEC is having monster game after monster game each and every week, while the ACC’s best games are…. SMU vs BC?
Of course the best players want to play in the most prestigious conference. The monetary difference will become insurmountable. NIL money will follow the top programs who are getting all the TV eyeballs. Those are the schools these kids want to play for. Money makes the world go round. It all makes perfect sense to me. And none of it is good for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12560]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 17, 2024, 12:03 AM
|
|
I can remember when Mizzou was ranked, was it #6? I called hogwash. Now that they’ve lost 3 games, I’m certain that I was correct in my initial estimations on Mizzou.
So now the coots win an epic battle, at home, late, coming from behind and I’m supposed to forget that Mizzou isn’t any good?
Well…..I didn’t forget. I expect the coots to pollute this place with their epic beak flapping frenzy for the next 2 weeks. Everyone over the age of 22 knows that a coot never shuts up. Never shutting up is the single greatest defining characteristic of a coot. Only death shuts up a coot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8109]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 3:44 PM
|
|
This is truth….
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1610]
TigerPulse: 57%
31
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 17, 2024, 12:25 AM
|
|
SEC money / NIL and use of the portal 🤷🏻♂️
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [347]
TigerPulse: 46%
15
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
1
Nov 17, 2024, 12:43 AM
|
|
It sucks but beamer uses all the resources available to him and changed w the times….dabo unfortunately did not. Thats why they have gotten better while we have slid backwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [155]
TigerPulse: 68%
12
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 1:03 AM
|
|
They’re not only better, but their schedule has made them battle tested. We might be in for a long day if we don’t bring our A games in two weeks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2179]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 3:11 AM
|
|
-Our state was loaded with elite OLine talent 2 years ago, and they inked 4 or 5 of them. Also got the #1 athlete that is doing a stellar job for them as a WR
- signed an elite edge rusher.
- Looks like they found an in-state under the radar QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [764]
TigerPulse: 89%
22
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 4:42 AM
|
|
By using all means necessary to recruit players. They get into bidding wars, they speak highly of NIL and they use the portal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1426]
TigerPulse: 91%
29
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 3:40 PM
|
|
Loaded question with unfounded assumption. We shall see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [98433]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 97798
Joined: 2009
|
Sure, I know exactly how!
Nov 17, 2024, 4:00 PM
|
|
It only happened in the minds of you coots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [2044]
TigerPulse: 99%
31
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 4:03 PM
|
|
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4542]
TigerPulse: 61%
36
|
Come on they had a fairly easy schedule this season.
Nov 17, 2024, 4:40 PM
|
|
They didn’t play UGA, TN, or UF like usuall. They lost to LSU… LSU.
They beat a very above avg A&M team and got blown out by ole Miss.
The should have lost last night but Mizzou doesn’t have a defense. Also none could have predicted that OK and Kentucky were gonna be as bad as they are this season.
Message was edited by: clemsonfan2000c®
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5903]
TigerPulse: 95%
39
|
Re: Can anyone explain how UofSC got better than Clemson?
Nov 17, 2024, 5:23 PM
|
|
They got 37 seniors. Lots of portal guys brought in to go along with a few good recruits. Who has a roster of 37 seniors? That’s great for this year but what about that large turnover for next year. This is why I speculate Beamer will be at VT next year along with a few of his players following him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4282]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Well, it might be true, but your post is idiotic.
Nov 17, 2024, 6:38 PM
|
|
SC has won how many vs Clemson the past 10 years?
SC has won how many natties the past 10 years?
SC has won how many conference championships the past 0 years?
SC has been in how many playoffs the past 10 years?
SC has how many 10 win seasons the past 10 years?
You are a clown if you think that Clemson will forever be better than SC every single year for the next 50 years.
Play the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [38]
TigerPulse: 100%
4
|
Re: Well, it might be true, but your post is idiotic.
Nov 18, 2024, 8:14 AM
|
|
Current Vegas odds Clemson -2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 58
| visibility 10374
|
|
|
|
50
