Replies: 22
| visibility 51
|
TigerNet HOFer [132343]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 59125
Joined: 2009
|
Suck it coots! Especially board trolls
Dec 7, 2013, 8:09 PM
|
|
You will NEVER win a conf championship!
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [62385]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 62582
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Suck it coots! Especially board trolls
Dec 7, 2013, 8:18 PM
|
|
Didn't they win one in 1866 or something like that.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [72765]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 43260
Joined: 2004
|
history before 2009 doesn't matter.***
Dec 7, 2013, 8:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [103]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
2011 ACC Champs
Dec 7, 2013, 8:23 PM
|
|
17 point win.. then received 5th place rings
|
|
|
|
 |
Member [20]
TigerPulse: 15%
3
|
Re: Suck it coots! Especially board trolls
Dec 7, 2013, 8:26 PM
|
|
Got that state championship on lockdown though.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet HOFer [132343]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 59125
Joined: 2009
|
Butt hurt, right? Tell me, coot, how do you
Dec 7, 2013, 8:51 PM
|
|
Sleep at nite, with that shitehole staff working for y'all?
|
|
|
|
 |
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: Butt hurt, right? Tell me, coot, how do you
Dec 7, 2013, 10:48 PM
|
|
You mean the one that outsmarts CU's current staff every year?
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 88%
41
Posts: 22593
Joined: 2003
|
Re: If they haven't won in by now, they never will***
Dec 7, 2013, 8:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6034]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
Clemson has the same number of sec titles that USCheat has
Dec 7, 2013, 8:29 PM
|
|
and NEVER joined the conference. Speaking of NEVER, USCheat will never win a sec football championship.
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [103]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Quick: Name a year that Clemson
Dec 7, 2013, 8:34 PM
|
|
would have even come close to winning the SEC since 1992.
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Warrior [4867]
TigerPulse: 92%
37
|
Re: Quick: Name a year that Clemson
Dec 7, 2013, 8:36 PM
|
|
Quick: name something sadder than trolling your rival's board.
|
|
|
|
 |
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: Quick: Name a year that Clemson
Dec 7, 2013, 10:50 PM
|
|
Talking trash about a team you've lost 5 straight to.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20605]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
The Coots are the 1969 ACC Champions***
Dec 7, 2013, 8:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [20605]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
|
Re: The Coots are the 1969 ACC Champions***
Dec 7, 2013, 8:37 PM
|
|
And that's about it.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet HOFer [132343]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 59125
Joined: 2009
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [103]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Wait, Dabo said SC and CU
Dec 7, 2013, 8:51 PM
|
|
aren't rivals.
Hey, all I will say is Clemson has a more storied football program, but let's not act like they have achieved anything more significant than SC since 1992.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet HOFer [132343]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 59125
Joined: 2009
|
Pathetic argument. Check every measure
Dec 7, 2013, 8:54 PM
|
|
Cept for yur 5 in a row.....pathetic!
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [103]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Every measure?
Dec 7, 2013, 8:57 PM
|
|
The premise of the OP's argument was championships. I think you are in complete denial if you think Clemson is viewed nationally as heads and shoulders as a program as South Carolina.
|
|
|
|
 |
Trainer [41]
TigerPulse: 92%
5
|
Re: Every measure?
Dec 7, 2013, 9:03 PM
|
|
It is difficult to understand why Gamecock fans spend so much time and energy blasting the "lowly" Clemson Tigers from the ACC on our board. If they spent as much on their own boards supporting their team maybe they would achieve their goals in the SEC.
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [1144]
TigerPulse: 53%
26
|
Re: Suck it coots! Especially board trolls
Dec 7, 2013, 9:17 PM
|
|
Well they did beat the ACC champs pretty bad in 2011, by 3 TD's I believe.
|
|
|
|
 |
Freshman [6]
TigerPulse: 33%
1
|
This^^^***
Dec 7, 2013, 11:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [103]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Ironic you say that
Dec 7, 2013, 9:19 PM
|
|
because like this thread, SC fans appear to be only responding to threads started by Clemson fans with threads like "suck it coots".
I think both fan bases have a preoccupation with the other. Don't act like it's one-sided.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rookie [17]
TigerPulse: 13%
2
|
Re: Ironic you say that
Dec 7, 2013, 10:47 PM
|
|
What is the average age of the people posting here....about 3 years old?
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 51
|
|
|