|
Replies: 21
| visibility 3889
|
Clemson Icon [24000]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 20273
Joined: 2011
|
Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
4
Jan 5, 2025, 11:40 AM
|
|
Saw someone saying they'll replace what they lost. Sure, being Bama, THEY MIGHT, but they're not re-[lacing the 1 or 2 years that they've already in building/training these 22
Same with EVERY single team losing 20 or more.
|
|
|
|
 |
TigerNet Elite [75410]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 118814
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
2
Jan 5, 2025, 11:46 AM
|
|
It would be funny if they beame a farm team for other programs due to transfers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41218]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11306
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
Jan 5, 2025, 12:30 PM
|
|
They are definitely headed that way that’s for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1637]
TigerPulse: 91%
31
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
2
Jan 5, 2025, 11:53 AM
|
|
Current trajectory trends for Bammer: 👎
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13906]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 12404
Joined: 2000
|
this is the way it will be for a while and it will get us too
5
5
Jan 5, 2025, 11:53 AM
|
|
building a "team system" will be tough and it will take tons of $$$ to make it work. Sure, you can keep a player for $400k this year, but that will be $1.4M soon enough and even schools like Michigan won't be able to pay up. It's a runaway train right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Playmaker [386]
TigerPulse: 99%
16
|
Re: this is the way it will be for a while and it will get us too
3
Jan 5, 2025, 12:04 PM
|
|
This current system is not sustainable. Changes will have to be made. I have some ideas but they are too simple and come from a “common sense “approach.
The current system will crash and burn. The teams/universities with the most “common sense “ approach will survive.
Go ahead and pile on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3159]
TigerPulse: 69%
34
|
It's called "Let the market decide".
2
Jan 5, 2025, 12:22 PM
|
|
If it's not sustainable, then market corrections will change it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41218]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11306
Joined: 2015
|
Re: It's called
3
Jan 5, 2025, 12:29 PM
|
|
We are not talking about the prices of toothpaste.
Not sure we are talking about the same markets. Having the most alumni does not equate to the so called market you speak of. Not but a handful of teams controlling the market. Not many can shop and pay what they do. Does kind of take the “fair” out of market value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [24317]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 11327
Joined: 1998
|
Re: It's called
Jan 5, 2025, 2:03 PM
|
|
It's OK, Blufftroll can only yak about the constant NIL drivel. Maybe an aspiring 'player agent' or something? 🤷
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [100681]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98480
Joined: 2009
|
I think most of us knew it was unsustainable from the start.
2
Jan 5, 2025, 12:52 PM
[ in reply to this is the way it will be for a while and it will get us too ] |
|
We can also expect the programs/universities to set this system right, or as close to right as possible soon. I suspect that's what the talk of reorganization includes.
Clemson has fared better than almost all of them and probably better knowing that our players have dependable partners on the field and sidelines. They know one another and are weeks ahead in preparing for next season.
I expect Clemson to come off the blocks in full stride and substitute heavily in all our games in prep for the coming year(s).
Our glass is almost full, the tiny bit of distress over the portal is minimum. Dabo knows what he's doing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41218]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11306
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
Jan 5, 2025, 12:26 PM
|
|
They see the writing on the wall. Their coach won’t be there too long.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6379]
TigerPulse: 96%
40
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
1
Jan 5, 2025, 12:30 PM
|
|
Exactly. Deboer like Venables have 1 more year and the nil and portal will be the cause of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6379]
TigerPulse: 96%
40
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
1
Jan 5, 2025, 12:34 PM
[ in reply to Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR ] |
|
Exactly. Deboer like Venables have 1 more year and the nil and portal will be the cause of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41218]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11306
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
Jan 5, 2025, 12:31 PM
|
|
Oklahoma was a surprise in the number of transfers. Thought BV would be doing a little better cultivating a culture he witnessed under Dabo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [100681]
TigerPulse: 100%
64
Posts: 98480
Joined: 2009
|
The obvious eludes the ignorant.***
Jan 5, 2025, 12:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60451]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 23738
Joined: 2005
|
These numbers would seem odd, but these sec teams....
1
Jan 5, 2025, 12:51 PM
|
|
Are signing approx 40 players per class. Contrast that to our smaller classes, and retention it's not that crazy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6803]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
Jan 5, 2025, 12:57 PM
|
|
Bama has great tradition, but their main selling point the last decades been Saban. They certainly don't have pockets as deep as many of the other true bloods so they may regress as time goes by.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [39433]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 22561
Joined: 2003
|
Bammer back to the pack by 2026***
Jan 5, 2025, 1:12 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4495]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
Jan 5, 2025, 1:12 PM
|
|
Hard to say how many left for more money/starting roles and how many were told to GTFO either by being told they weren't wanted or that they could stay but their NIL was being reduced or going away.
Bama has always done the SEC thing of overrecruiting and then dumping players who wouldn't contribute soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13785]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
Jan 5, 2025, 1:14 PM
|
|
They seem like they are slightly cycling out now and that could up pace with another off season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [29273]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 22000
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
Jan 5, 2025, 2:07 PM
|
|
I think the portal and NIL have hit Bama pretty hard and they won't replace quality but only in quantity. Same as USuC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [400]
TigerPulse: 100%
17
|
Re: Bama's lost 22 to portal, SO FAR
Jan 5, 2025, 2:27 PM
|
|
Lossing a large number and replacing with the portal is like a roll of the dice. It could go well or terrible. Will these players mesh with themselves, the coaches and the players already there? Will the amount of money being paid become friction between players? Will these teams have sustainable depth? How long it will take before this model is not sustainable over time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 3889
|
|
|
50
