|
Replies: 33
| visibility 3563
|
Legend [7047]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
9
9
Jan 1, 2024, 8:53 PM
|
|
FSU defense probably better. With FSU’s WRs, i think they’d have been more effective in the passing game than Bama was.
Message was edited by: RC Tiger®
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1886]
TigerPulse: 99%
31
|
Re: Bama isnt better the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
Jan 1, 2024, 8:55 PM
|
|
Seriously??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [858]
TigerPulse: 83%
23
|
Re: Bama isnt better the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
Jan 1, 2024, 8:57 PM
|
|
Bama not better than the FSU Travis team. Not sure about the FSU with 3rd team QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9890]
TigerPulse: 71%
44
Posts: 10036
Joined: 2017
|
It would have been FSUs 2nd QB.***
1
Jan 1, 2024, 9:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [453]
TigerPulse: 92%
18
|
Re: Bama isnt better the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
2
Jan 1, 2024, 10:21 PM
[ in reply to Re: Bama isnt better the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team ] |
|
Bama would slaughter FSU. They’re by far the weakest ACC conference champion in decades. I like our chances against them next year at their place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-82]
TigerPulse: 32%
-1
|
Re: Bama isnt better the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
2
Jan 1, 2024, 10:45 PM
|
|
No the weakest ACC Champ was Clemson in 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4710]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9890]
TigerPulse: 71%
44
Posts: 10036
Joined: 2017
|
Exactly right.***
3
Jan 1, 2024, 8:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9809]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
1
Jan 1, 2024, 8:57 PM
|
|
100% agree
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1922]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
If I had to guess...FSU might have scored 7
Jan 1, 2024, 9:00 PM
|
|
Is what it is, no one cares anymore. Michigan defense dominated Bama's Oline, no reason to think the wouldnt do that to FSU
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2579]
TigerPulse: 90%
32
|
Stop it, please
6
6
Jan 1, 2024, 9:02 PM
|
|
FSU didn't qualify, plain and simple, and the committee got it right based on all criteria set before them. And players were not even all-in with the program, bailed ship. They didn't stand up and play for their school in the end. (Actually, we had a few that bailed too, unfortunately). Bama was the best team for this matchup by far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1899]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
Re: Stop it, please
Jan 1, 2024, 9:27 PM
|
|
Agreed, agreed and agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7047]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
What criteria? The eye test? Lol
2
Jan 1, 2024, 9:36 PM
[ in reply to Stop it, please ] |
|
And what does opting out of a meaningless bowl game have to do with anything. They wouldn't have opted out if they had been in the CFP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9890]
TigerPulse: 71%
44
Posts: 10036
Joined: 2017
|
Yes.
1
Jan 2, 2024, 5:25 AM
|
|
Don’t ya know their personal opinion counted way more than the actual games that were played? 🤡
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19860]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15092
Joined: 2010
|
That
1
Jan 1, 2024, 10:06 PM
[ in reply to Stop it, please ] |
|
FSU didn't qualify, plain and simple, and the committee got it right based on all criteria set before them. And players were not even all-in with the program, bailed ship. They didn't stand up and play for their school in the end. (Actually, we had a few that bailed too, unfortunately). Bama was the best team for this matchup by far.
And Bama's 5 stars would physically pummel FSU's and Clemson's 2023 squads to a pulp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4614]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
Jan 1, 2024, 9:29 PM
|
|
You mean pre Travis Injury right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [60388]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 12036
Joined: 2019
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
1
Jan 1, 2024, 9:55 PM
|
|
Bama isn't better than Auburn either, but they are way luckier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3625]
TigerPulse: 98%
35
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
1
Jan 1, 2024, 9:56 PM
|
|
I think FSU at their best is maybe 10th in the nation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9890]
TigerPulse: 71%
44
Posts: 10036
Joined: 2017
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
2
Jan 2, 2024, 5:26 AM
|
|
“I think”
🤡
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1316]
TigerPulse: 74%
28
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
Jan 1, 2024, 10:11 PM
|
|
U R out of reality!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59567]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 23901
Joined: 2011
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
1
Jan 1, 2024, 10:21 PM
|
|
So, you think Clemson would almost beat Bama since they almost beat an intact FSU?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [118]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
2
Jan 1, 2024, 10:52 PM
|
|
I have no idea if they would or not but everyone thought bama would beat down arkansas, auburn and south Florida. Healthy fsu also beat lsu more handily than bama. That’s what makes college football great, anything can happen any week
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9809]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
1
Jan 1, 2024, 11:22 PM
[ in reply to Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team ] |
|
Clemson would beat the #### out of Bama, the puppies and any other SEC team you guys love so much.
Kentucky already got their beat down, who's next?
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7700]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
What?
1
Jan 1, 2024, 10:54 PM
|
|
What kind of mind bending logic are your trying to come up with?
Again I say: WHAT?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1567]
TigerPulse: 95%
30
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
Jan 1, 2024, 11:02 PM
|
|
You seem like the kind of guy that could trip on his lower lip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43650]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11102
Joined: 2017
|
The same team that could barely muster 200yds against Louisville?
3
Jan 1, 2024, 11:14 PM
|
|
55 yards passing against Louisville?
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7700]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
It's like the whole FSU rightfully not in the playoff broke some of TNet.
2
Jan 1, 2024, 11:19 PM
|
|
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43650]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11102
Joined: 2017
|
They need to stop smoking that ACC homegrown.
1
Jan 1, 2024, 11:26 PM
|
|
FSU without Jordan Travis is garbage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7047]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [43650]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 11102
Joined: 2017
|
You are talking about the guy that had a 43.8 QBR against a
1
Jan 1, 2024, 11:46 PM
|
|
horrible Florida team? That guy would lead them to glory?
I love you guys but ya’ll are dead wrong about this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1208]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
Jan 1, 2024, 11:51 PM
|
|
Put down the BONG
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1126]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: Bama isnt better than the pre-Orange Bowl FSU team
2
Jan 2, 2024, 12:00 AM
|
|
I think 100% FSU and maybe Washington were the best teams this year.
Think about it. Bama and UGA are not as good as last year. FSU was strong last year(beat LSU who won the west) and through the portal they were MUCH better this year. Those two big wideouts and defense would’ve given them a chance in any game.
They held fsu out because of not having Travis, but have you seen Milroe from Bama? One of the most boneheaded QB’s we’ve ever seen. Super athlete, but does stuff like throw passes 5 yards past the line of scrimmage. He threw for about 120 yards vs Michigan.
So yea objectively FSU had a stronger claim than “the eye test”. Especially now that Texas (defacto SEC champ) is about to lose by double digits.
FSU had everything unravel this year, and I’m ok with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1899]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
Bama > FSU
Jan 2, 2024, 12:02 AM
|
|
with or without Jordan Travis.
The committee got it right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1126]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: Bama > FSU
1
Jan 2, 2024, 1:58 AM
|
|
Did they get it right when they put UGA 6th? No.
This year will play out and we will crown a champion, but we won’t definitively know who the best team was because remember, it’s all the “eye test” now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 33
| visibility 3563
|
|
|
50
