|
Replies: 23
| visibility 3785
|
Game Changer [1692]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
|
|
|
 |
Paw Master [17093]
TigerPulse: 91%
51
Posts: 27268
Joined: 2003
|
If you have to ask...***
3
Nov 16, 2024, 10:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4177]
TigerPulse: 99%
36
|
Obviously we're a good team. But not great.
3
Nov 16, 2024, 10:41 PM
|
|
We have the talent and potential to take another step, but seem incapable of doing it thus far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2214]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Have to disagree. Do not think this team has the
3
Nov 16, 2024, 11:11 PM
|
|
talent. Cade is good, not great, same for Mafah. OLine is improved from last couple of years but still just above average. Defense while O.K. might be worst we've had in last 10 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22863]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 10936
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Are we good or not?
2
Nov 16, 2024, 10:45 PM
|
|
If 50 is average out of 100, we are 70-75. No where close to elite like we used to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6579]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: Are we good or not?
2
Nov 16, 2024, 10:46 PM
|
|
Sure we are objectively "good " team. Not many 8-2 teams you wouldn't say that about at this point in the season. But the reality is it would be hard to say we are anything more than that unfortunately. We will end up with 2-3 losses and go to some random bowl game and end up with a season very similar to the last four, which also indicate those teams were "good". You can either be at peace with that or gnash your teeth at what once was but will probably never be again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4318]
TigerPulse: 96%
36
|
Re: Are we good or not?
1
Nov 16, 2024, 10:59 PM
|
|
I think we have a good enough team that is capable of beating anybody on a given Saturday.
Pitt’s a solid team. Backups usually don’t perform that well, but that guy played well and took a beating.
Clemson misses opportunities. They are there, but they miss closely on a bunch of things.
As simple as receivers not getting loose for TDs when they should be.
We’re good, and we will be a real contender if everybody is healthy, and we somehow get a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8987]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10678
Joined: 2003
|
Disagree. We are not good enough to beat anybody.***
1
Nov 17, 2024, 6:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8987]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
Posts: 10678
Joined: 2003
|
Disagree. We are not good enough to beat anybody.***
1
Nov 17, 2024, 6:19 AM
[ in reply to Re: Are we good or not? ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19653]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 15028
Joined: 2010
|
This 2024 squad is solid C+ to B- caliber
1
Nov 16, 2024, 11:40 PM
|
|
Nothing to sneeze at. Nothing to glorify.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [204]
TigerPulse: 92%
13
|
Re: Are we good or not?
2
Nov 17, 2024, 12:01 AM
|
|
Just good enough, a notch above average.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [621]
TigerPulse: 85%
21
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 6:23 AM
|
|
This is a B rated team overall
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4747]
TigerPulse: 82%
37
|
Re: Are we good or not?
1
Nov 17, 2024, 11:37 AM
[ in reply to Re: Are we good or not? ] |
|
I agree with many people here - we are good but not great.
Imagine what we might be if we had shored up our 2 or 3 weakest spots through the portal. This is the difference between good and great in the current NCAA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [204]
TigerPulse: 92%
13
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 12:01 AM
|
|
Just good enough, a notch above average.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [346]
TigerPulse: 47%
15
|
Re: Are we good or not?
1
Nov 17, 2024, 1:03 AM
|
|
We are good…not great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [5077]
TigerPulse: 96%
37
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 1:22 AM
|
|
Until the recruiting improves to top 5 or top 10 again ...we better get used to this
Message was edited by: spiderman_x10®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4989]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 1:16 PM
|
|
Above average talent with below average coaching!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [489]
TigerPulse: 99%
18
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 1:56 AM
|
|
ACC better than average, 4-4 in the SEC. Good, not really good or great
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11390]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 6:06 AM
|
|
Nyes
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3995]
TigerPulse: 99%
35
|
There are no swag surfers on this D-line - but the CLEM D is pretty good
Nov 17, 2024, 6:12 AM
|
|
I’m still quite in the dark about this Clemson offense, particularly the receiving core.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4724]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: There are no swag surfers on this D-line - but the CLEM D is pretty good
Nov 17, 2024, 1:15 PM
|
|
Woods and Parker are dudes that would play on any of our previous D-Lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [220]
TigerPulse: 52%
13
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 7:46 AM
|
|
We are average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2192]
TigerPulse: 95%
32
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 1:08 PM
|
|
Given the recruiting rankings we're underachievers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1354]
TigerPulse: 88%
28
|
Re: Are we good or not?
Nov 17, 2024, 1:14 PM
|
|
We're Great
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 23
| visibility 3785
|
|
|
50
