|
Replies: 28
| visibility 3604
|
110%er [3648]
TigerPulse: 89%
35
|
10-1 not ranked???
6
6
Feb 1, 2025, 6:25 PM
|
|
Has a team that is 10-1 in the ACC ever not been ranked in the top 25? Top 10? Top 5?
Yeah I know the ACC is down but it’s not down that far.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Immortal [64218]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
5
5
Feb 1, 2025, 6:27 PM
|
|
It would be too horrible to allow Clemson to be top ten in Basketball and Football in a basketball conference (ACC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12386]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
4
Feb 1, 2025, 6:28 PM
|
|
If our name was UNC, Pitt, UVA, or Cuse, we would be top 10 rank. But of course history often proves that we blow games every time we get ranked. Let this work in our favor and let teams underestimate us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [69312]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 42626
Joined: 2004
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
7
7
Feb 1, 2025, 6:37 PM
|
|
These days it's changed to "if our name was Alabama, Florida, or Tennessee..." we would be top 10. thanks Swoffie!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12386]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
4
Feb 1, 2025, 6:38 PM
|
|
Thanks for the correction, I knew I was living in the past!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [4044]
TigerPulse: 99%
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9356]
TigerPulse: 95%
44
Posts: 13926
Joined: 2002
|
Our basketball program gets no respect.***
6
6
Feb 1, 2025, 6:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Icon [149841]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35307
Joined: 2010
|
FIFY: Our basketball coach gets no respect.******
1
Feb 1, 2025, 8:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22893]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14674
Joined: 1995
|
How could such a Dabo apologist hate Brownell so much?
2
Feb 1, 2025, 11:01 PM
|
|
Strange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Icon [149841]
TigerPulse: 100%
68
Posts: 35307
Joined: 2010
|
I dont hate Brownell.
Feb 2, 2025, 8:57 AM
|
|
Why are you not saying the poster I responded to hates our program? He said the exact same thing, just replaced CBB with our basketball
program.
Clemson has been highly ranked under other coaches in the past, and they aren’t now. Drawing the logical conclusion that polls don’t respect CBB is not me hating on him, it’s an observation. This is another clear case of bias against the poster, not the post.
PS: Let me know the next time anyone accuses you of being a CBB defender. I’ve been labeled that in the past, I’m guessing you have not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8533]
TigerPulse: 97%
43
|
It IS down that far. The acc is terrible.***
3
Feb 1, 2025, 7:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [144]
TigerPulse: 92%
11
|
Re: It IS down that far. The acc is terrible.***
Feb 1, 2025, 7:23 PM
|
|
Your terrible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [8533]
TigerPulse: 97%
43
|
You're ******
2
Feb 1, 2025, 7:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5335]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Yore***
Feb 2, 2025, 8:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1390]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: Yur******
1
Feb 2, 2025, 9:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11133]
TigerPulse: 96%
46
Posts: 12184
Joined: 2003
|
Re: It IS down that far. The acc is terrible.***
Feb 2, 2025, 11:26 AM
[ in reply to It IS down that far. The acc is terrible.*** ] |
|
What does this have to do with Clemson not being ranked? Duke is highly ranked against the same weak conference and our OOC record is very good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3109]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
2
Feb 1, 2025, 7:21 PM
|
|
We will crack the top 25 Monday, but we should be around 12 to 15 now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17823]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11836
Joined: 2024
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
1
Feb 1, 2025, 7:54 PM
|
|
Yeah I think we should be ranked in the teens somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1469]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
1
Feb 1, 2025, 8:13 PM
|
|
This team is really growing on me. The momentum carried over from last season and these guys went with it! They never get flustered. Really focused in their approach. Fun to watch. Go Tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1385]
TigerPulse: 96%
28
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
Feb 1, 2025, 8:14 PM
|
|
No reason we shouldn’t be after Louisville, Ole Miss and Vanderbilt lost
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7402]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
Feb 2, 2025, 11:13 AM
|
|
and Kentucky and Iowa State.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [581]
TigerPulse: 100%
20
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
1
Feb 1, 2025, 8:22 PM
|
|
Rankings don't matter as much when 68 teams get in the tournament and we will easily get in. Then it's a matter of showing out against whomever we play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22648]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 13344
Joined: 2018
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
Feb 1, 2025, 8:55 PM
|
|
Seeding matters…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [348]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Is this the year that Clemson wins its first ACC Tournament?
Feb 1, 2025, 8:47 PM
|
|
One of our best chances since the Larry Nance era.... But, of course, Duke is the obstacle....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1363]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
Feb 1, 2025, 8:54 PM
|
|
We will be this week, but I’ve been saying this for 2 weeks. NC State alum texted me after game for congratulation. I told him some of y’all still hate on Brad Brownell. He said State would be happy to take him, and their team just went to Final Four.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [28768]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 34363
Joined: 2009
|
meanwhile there are several 5 loss teams in the top 15
Feb 1, 2025, 11:04 PM
|
|
and a 6 loss Illinois at #18
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2433]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: meanwhile there are several 5 loss teams in the top 15
Feb 1, 2025, 11:25 PM
|
|
Yep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [17720]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 11393
Joined: 2007
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
6
6
Feb 1, 2025, 11:05 PM
|
|
It is down that far. This isn’t the 8 team league that could get 6 in the tourney. This is an 18 team trash pile where 8 teams aren’t even in the Top 100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3648]
TigerPulse: 89%
35
|
Re: 10-1 not ranked???
Feb 2, 2025, 5:16 PM
|
|
Bull
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 28
| visibility 3604
|
|
|
50
