Replies: 14
| visibility 1
|
110%er [6376]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8855
Joined: 11/3/04
|
Out of curiousity, how much do you pay CU for cell service?
Sep 10, 2012, 10:05 AM
|
|
Oh wait, you mean to tell me that they don't offer cellular service for profit?
Wait what?
Maybe your complaints would be better served on the appropriate forum.
http://forums.verizon.com/
Not EVERYTHING is Clemson's fault .
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3788]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9880
Joined: 11/2/08
|
But when you advertise like crazy that
Sep 10, 2012, 10:17 AM
|
|
cell service will be improved in the stadium because you just installed these fancy signal boosters, we should notice improvement.
Did IPTAY donations pay for those boosters? If so then we paid CU for the service.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7962
Joined: 2/27/02
|
Yep. If Clemson advertises that they've taken steps to
Sep 10, 2012, 10:19 AM
|
|
improve service for all their fans and it doesn't happen, shouldn't Clemson be the one you let know?
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6376]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8855
Joined: 11/3/04
|
Isn't Verizon one of our sponsors?
Sep 10, 2012, 10:26 AM
|
|
How do you know that this wasn't part of a sponsorship package to promote service. Fact of the matter is, Clemson had no way to Beta test these boosters until Saturday, so they HAD to rely on Verizon's research on the matter. Clemson was probably obligated to advertise it as a part of the sponsorship with Verizon. Again, not Clemson's problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7962
Joined: 2/27/02
|
Clemson shouldn't have sent out a press release touting it
Sep 10, 2012, 10:28 AM
|
|
then if they weren't sure it worked 100%.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6376]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8855
Joined: 11/3/04
|
Sponsorship have contractual obligations...
Sep 10, 2012, 10:36 AM
|
|
the press release could have been a legal requirement in the contract execution.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7962
Joined: 2/27/02
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6376]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8855
Joined: 11/3/04
|
Wow, someone in the IPTAY office saw a crane
Sep 10, 2012, 10:42 AM
|
|
and wanted to tweet about a stadium improvement that he was told would upgrade the cell signal.
I think that calls for a full ticket refund for all Verizon customers.
It's no more or less than any other photo update we see posted here 10 times a day from members. Guy was excited about an improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7962
Joined: 2/27/02
|
Well you can spin every example I post the way you want, but
Sep 10, 2012, 10:53 AM
|
|
is everything I've known and learned about the cell phone improvements came from Clemson. They sent out a press the fact is that Clemson sent out the release, they put quotes in news stories (including on TNet about them), numerous people within the athletic department (including the schools official handles) put out tweets talking about the enhancement and what it is going to do. I've been told the same was done on facebook. Clemson also has to approve every ad that goes up on those strip screens so isn't the onus on them to make it accurate?
Considering all the different times and ways I've heard about this from Clemson and Clemson only, I certainly think Clemson is the ones to let know if it isn't working. The first time I even saw verizon advertise it was at the game (again, which Clemson had to improve it), but by then I had already heard about it 1,000 times.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7962
Joined: 2/27/02
|
Stupid tablets. What I was trying to say is
Sep 10, 2012, 10:57 AM
|
|
you can spin every example I post the way you want, but everything I've known and learned about the cell phone improvements came from Clemson. They sent out a press release, they put quotes in news stories (including on TNet about them), numerous people within the athletic department (including the schools official handles) put out tweets talking about the enhancement and what it is going to do. I've been told the same was done on facebook. Clemson also has to approve every ad that goes up on those strip screens so isn't the onus on them to make it accurate?
Considering all the different times and ways I've heard about this from Clemson and Clemson only, I certainly think Clemson is the ones to let know if it isn't working. The first time I even saw verizon advertise it was at the game (again, which Clemson had to improve it), but by then I had already heard about it 1,000 times.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6376]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8855
Joined: 11/3/04
|
Wait, your tablet failed you?
Sep 10, 2012, 11:09 AM
|
|
have you complained on tigernet about it yet?
See what I did there?
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3788]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9880
Joined: 11/2/08
|
But it should be us complaining to Clemson
Sep 10, 2012, 10:29 AM
[ in reply to Isn't Verizon one of our sponsors? ] |
|
and then Clemson complaining to Verizon for making them look like idiots.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23115]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19817
Joined: 1/15/11
|
ATT customers were texting me the whole game.***
Sep 10, 2012, 10:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4988]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7962
Joined: 2/27/02
|
My texts actually worked fine. I had the darnest time
Sep 10, 2012, 10:26 AM
|
|
checking the scores and stats that were advertised that I'd be able to do though.
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [294]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 357
Joined: 7/21/09
|
Re: Out of curiousity, how much do you pay CU for cell service?
Sep 10, 2012, 11:41 AM
|
|
I was on T-Mobile and I couldn't get any service until the second half when everybody left haha
|
|
|
|
Replies: 14
| visibility 1
|
|
|