Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Toledo. James Madison.
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 22
| visibility 1,051

Toledo. James Madison.


Nov 27, 2023, 9:03 AM
Reply

SMU. just unbelievable

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Maybe we should've tried not losing 4 games

1

Nov 27, 2023, 9:05 AM
Reply

You also forgot Tulane and Liberty.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Wonder how those 5 would have done with a diffenet

2

Nov 27, 2023, 9:10 AM
Reply

Schedule Like ours

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ahh yes the old Coot excuse***

1
1

Nov 27, 2023, 9:33 AM
Reply



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

you must be a coot to think that's an excuse

1

Nov 27, 2023, 11:18 AM
Reply

if you think those teams have the same record playing a power five schedule versus the group of 5 schedule then just stay ignorant

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: you must be a coot to think that's an excuse

1
1

Nov 27, 2023, 11:23 AM
Reply

They would probably beat Miami,Duke and nc.state...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: you must be a coot to think that's an excuse


Nov 27, 2023, 11:38 AM
Reply

my brother in Christ you may want to visit a doctor to check for mental retardation

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Maybe we should've tried not losing 4 games

2

Nov 27, 2023, 9:34 AM [ in reply to Maybe we should've tried not losing 4 games ]
Reply

you really think they are better than us? lol - schedule matters

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No, but i see a pretty big double standard here


Nov 28, 2023, 11:48 AM
Reply

This is essentially the same thing everyone here freaks out about when an 8-4 SEC team is ranked. Now that it's Clemson it's suddenly justifiable.

If we are talking about pure power ratings, this Clemson team is probably top 15ish even with the broken offense. But polls aren't power ratings and the #1 factor in polls is still how many wins and losses a team has - with an obvious penalty for most G5 teams.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Maybe we should've tried not losing 4 games

1

Nov 27, 2023, 11:32 AM [ in reply to Maybe we should've tried not losing 4 games ]
Reply

Sure. The teams i listed mainly because we wouldn’t be higher than 23 anyway with 4 Ls. but my god, if our schedule consisted of glorified varsity highschoolers then we would be. between them the only remotely competitive team they’ve played was SMU taking on then 18th-ranked oklahoma, and they got blown out of town. the whole thing is a joke. Just compare the AP to FPI

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Toledo. James Madison.


Nov 27, 2023, 9:06 AM
Reply

Would you please expand upon that for 99.9% of us?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I do believe the OP is grousing about teams that are ranked ahead of us in the

3

Nov 27, 2023, 9:11 AM
Reply

AP Pole.

Or, it could just be indigestion.

:)

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Toledo. James Madison.


Nov 27, 2023, 9:11 AM [ in reply to Re: Toledo. James Madison. ]
Reply

better records than Clemson?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You must be an AP voter***

2

Nov 27, 2023, 9:35 AM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Toledo. James Madison.

1

Nov 27, 2023, 11:33 AM [ in reply to Re: Toledo. James Madison. ]
Reply

Yeah, against fcs teams 🤦‍♂️

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Toledo. James Madison.

1

Nov 27, 2023, 9:14 AM
Reply

Part of it is that the teams we beat when they were ranked have continued to drop down the poles themselves. UNC for example.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Toledo. James Madison.

3

Nov 27, 2023, 9:30 AM
Reply

It's like that with the AP every year. But you're right, any of the teams mentioned lost handily to the team (s) they played in a p5 contest.

Now if your point is to state how we'd fair against them, we would beat them handily.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Tulane won the Cotton bowl last year

1

Nov 27, 2023, 9:34 AM
Reply

I know that's not one of the teams he specifically mentioned, but some of these G5 teams are pretty legit.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Our Tigers deserve a top 25 ranking, but

1

Nov 27, 2023, 10:41 AM
Reply

Clemson played three … only three … noteworthy teams.

Florida State … lost the tie
North Carolina State … lost
Notre Dame … won

Outside those we lost to a medium Duke team and lost a tie to a medium Miami team.

It’s good to be top25, but our record allows us no room to complain about other teams rank … all we can really say is (grate your teeth) … “Wait until next year”

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Tulane won the Cotton bowl last year


Nov 27, 2023, 11:45 AM [ in reply to Tulane won the Cotton bowl last year ]
Reply

Tulane’s a pretty good team, but again, they committed sudoku in the second half against their only good opponent on the season

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Toledo. James Madison.


Nov 27, 2023, 11:36 AM [ in reply to Re: Toledo. James Madison. ]
Reply

This is all true, it’s just really frustrating. ultimately we have ourselves to blame for being disrespected, gotta be better on the field if we want a competition strength of schedule. I don’t have to say anything about what would happen if we played these shmucks

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Poles (AP, Coaches, CFP) are based primarily on most deserving


Nov 27, 2023, 11:30 AM
Reply

Not “the best”. Not who would win on a 1-1 match up at a neutral site. Nor if one team beats another earlier in the season they should be ranked higher. This isn’t match play or single elimination.

And for those complaining about bias…no ####. Of course there is bias because it’s opinion. And advanced stats are biased based on how they are programmed.

Yes, was a rhetorical post by op but I was compelled to write this drivel.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Poles (AP, Coaches, CFP) are based primarily on most deserving


Nov 27, 2023, 11:43 AM
Reply

the problem is that it’s never properly distributed. LSU, for example, has won one of their ranked games and lost the rest. They have a strong strength of schedule but still came up short and won’t sniff a conference champ this year. All in all, very similar to our season, a little better result. And yet, the same polls that “appropriately” punish us for losing four games treat lsu like there’s 11 Jayden Daniels running around on offense

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 22
| visibility 1,051
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic