|
Replies: 15
| visibility 238
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45373
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson seniors once again chasing history as record-breaking run continues
Jun 27, 2020, 8:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14702]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
|
Re: TNET: Clemson seniors once again chasing history as record-breaking run continues
Jun 27, 2020, 8:15 AM
|
|
Am I dreaming? Pinch me!
What a run...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2121]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: TNET: Clemson seniors once again chasing history as record-breaking run continues
Jun 27, 2020, 8:46 AM
|
|
Nebraska from 1993 to 1997 is probably the best ever. They lost 1 game in 1993 that they should have probably won and then 2 games in 1996 in shocking upsets, but they still finished 60-3.
I can see future Clemson senior classes accomplishing that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1904]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Back then they only played 12 games.
Jun 27, 2020, 7:09 PM
|
|
it must have been 45-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11651]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 14266
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Back then they only played 12 games.
Jun 27, 2020, 9:33 PM
|
|
No, from 1993-1997, Nebraska was indeed 60-3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2185]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Back then they only played 12 games.
Jun 27, 2020, 11:20 PM
|
|
Sorry, buts not true. If they were 60-3, they would be on the list, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet GOAT [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
|
Re: Back then they only played 12 games.
Jun 27, 2020, 11:42 PM
|
|
Sorry, buts not true. If they were 60-3, they would be on the list, right?
Clemson's graphic in the story is measuring in four-season spans, while 1993-97 would be five seasons. So Nebraska's best four-year run in that stretch was 49-2, which left them just short of that top-10 in wins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2121]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: Back then they only played 12 games.
Jun 28, 2020, 1:29 PM
[ in reply to Re: Back then they only played 12 games. ] |
|
The list was most 'wins' in a 5 year period and it didn't go back to the 1990s.
I was talking about the best record over a 5 year period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6938]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2121]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: Back then they only played 12 games.
Jun 28, 2020, 1:30 PM
|
|
The article was about a 5 year period which obviously included a redshirt opportunity of a senior.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1327]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
One SMALL point...
Jun 28, 2020, 9:23 AM
|
|
Clemson and Alabama did not just “split two national championships” in this span. We are 2-1. ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1327]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
One SMALL point...
Jun 28, 2020, 9:23 AM
|
|
Clemson and Alabama did not just “split two national championships” in this span. We are 2-1. ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1327]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
One SMALL point...
Jun 28, 2020, 9:23 AM
|
|
Clemson and Alabama did not just “split two national championships” in this span. We are 2-1. ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1327]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
One SMALL point...
Jun 28, 2020, 9:23 AM
|
|
Clemson and Alabama did not just “split two national championships” in this span. We are 2-1. ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2121]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: One SMALL point...
Jun 28, 2020, 1:38 PM
|
|
I can't help being a smart ###, but I think we all got your small point the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1327]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: One SMALL point...
Jun 28, 2020, 4:27 PM
|
|
I don't mind a smarta$$. Better than a dumba$$. Computer glitch of course. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 238
|
|
|
50
