|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1,151
|
Orange Blooded [2984]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2429
Joined: 8/31/14
|
We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence
1
Oct 22, 2023, 8:23 AM
|
|
And that is concerning. OL is horrid. RB personell calls is concerning, and the only thing going for the WRs is that they don’t fumble.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3227]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4096
Joined: 6/24/23
|
Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence
5
5
Oct 22, 2023, 8:27 AM
|
|
I think we would be undefeated with either of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5086]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5921
Joined: 11/28/12
|
Re: Plus Watson On Any Quarterback Run..... ---
Oct 22, 2023, 8:30 AM
|
|
.......is stiff arming any defender while turning that corner at the line of scrimmage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [15]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11
Joined: 8/2/17
|
Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence
1
Oct 22, 2023, 8:40 AM
[ in reply to Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence ] |
|
I agree
Our skill positions were good enough to cover both poor play calling & an average, at best, OLine- not anymore.
The OLine is worse, and we have a quarterback with the mentality of a HS freshman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3141]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4016
Joined: 7/31/17
|
Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence
Oct 22, 2023, 12:27 PM
[ in reply to Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence ] |
|
If we still had Watson or Lawrence we would still have some combination of Williams, Renfrow, Leggett, Gallman, Etienne, Higgins, the Power Rangers etc. So yeah, things would look different out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1779]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3075
Joined: 11/2/00
|
Think we win last night and maybe Fl.St. with
Oct 22, 2023, 8:28 AM
|
|
either one of them. Not totally blaming Cade but those guys had enough talent and that "it" factor to overcome the rest of the shortcomings to at least make a couple of more plays. That's all we would have needed in either game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [377]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 539
Joined: 1/12/12
|
Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence
Oct 22, 2023, 8:29 AM
|
|
Nooooo we wouldnt...we would be undefeated with either!!! Hell we would be undefeated with kelley because at least he knew his place and understood his role and was good at it!!! We havent a qb good at anything in 3 years!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1297]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1859
Joined: 6/4/15
|
Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence
3
Oct 22, 2023, 8:41 AM
|
|
This is the problem with some of our fans... if you honestly think we would be 4-3 with Trevor and Deshaun right now you're a idiot... sorry if that offends you, but you're a idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2984]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2429
Joined: 8/31/14
|
Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence
Oct 22, 2023, 9:26 AM
|
|
QB is a problem. Has been. But so is literally every other position group on offense. Look at what happened with Lamar when he was the only guy for UL… still had 3 losses. One guy can’t fix the problem. Watson and Lawrence are running for their lives in the backfield with this offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7148]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3799
Joined: 9/19/10
|
are you kidding?***
Oct 22, 2023, 9:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [220]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 313
Joined: 10/2/00
|
Nope. You are wrong about that.***
Oct 22, 2023, 9:28 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2861]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4311
Joined: 8/30/08
|
Re: We would still be 4-3 with Watson or Lawrence
Oct 22, 2023, 9:32 AM
|
|
We would have been undefeated with both most likely. But let’s be honest, these are 2 top tier players even in the NFL. So we have gotten spoiled with that level of QB play.
Cade had a little success with Brinny and kept only looking at the TE instead of going thru progressions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7148]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3799
Joined: 9/19/10
|
You would see a whole different team with either one of them, confidence
Oct 22, 2023, 9:36 AM
|
|
inspires fellow team mates. I suspect we would be undefeated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 12
| visibility 1,151
|
|
|
50
