|
Replies: 19
| visibility 2453
|
All-In [10244]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 16962
Joined: 2001
|
Records: Clemson vs SEC teams
Aug 13, 2011, 9:28 PM
|
|
Clemson has a losing record against every SEC school except for South Carolina. (Well, and Mississippi State, which it's 1-1-1 against). Overall, the Tigers are 112-160-14 against the SEC. Do you still want to line up against Alabama, Auburn and Georgia every year?
Check it out:
CLEMSON vs.:
Alabama (3-12 remember what happened last time?)
Auburn (11-33)
Florida (3-9)
Georgia (17-41)
Kentucky (5-8, thanks to a Music City Bowl win this year)
LSU (0-2)
Mississippi (0-2)
Mississippi State (1-1-1)
South Carolina (65-38)
Tennessee (6-11)
Vanderbilt (1-3)
Still think it's a good idea?
|
|
|
|
 |
Tiger Titan [48478]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 43221
Joined: 1998
|
South Carolina had a worse history vs. the SEC going in.
Aug 13, 2011, 9:30 PM
|
|
They're still surviving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [222]
TigerPulse: 52%
13
|
Re: South Carolina had a worse history vs. the SEC going in.
Aug 13, 2011, 9:31 PM
|
|
I was going to say the same thing. We have losing records to most SEC programs, but we still get that fat SEC check every year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [11400]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 11211
Joined: 2007
|
Yep. Think of what the records would be with SEC Money
Aug 13, 2011, 9:30 PM
|
|
coming in versus ACC money. Our record isn't good now, but think how much better it will get when we head on over and leave this dry pit of crap that Swoffy has created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Champion [120763]
TigerPulse: 100%
65
Posts: 77476
Joined: 2003
|
Re: Records: Clemson vs SEC teams
Aug 13, 2011, 9:34 PM
|
|
with the exception if georgia, most of those losses to the SEC occured when the helmets had no facemasks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5349]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Youre right. Miss, MissSt, and Vandy would dominate us
Aug 13, 2011, 9:34 PM
|
|
according to those records....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16128]
TigerPulse: 97%
51
Posts: 24632
Joined: 2002
|
Clemson hasn't played a bunch of those teams in...
Aug 13, 2011, 9:36 PM
|
|
deacdes. If we joined the SEC, in our first decade there is no doubt we'd have winning records against Ole Miss, Vandy, UK, Miss St, USeC, and Tennessee (with the situation they are now in with the NCAA).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4109]
TigerPulse: 80%
36
|
We would have to step it up a notch
Aug 13, 2011, 9:45 PM
|
|
but whats wrong with that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1910]
TigerPulse: 99%
31
|
and if we dont play them, how will that ever change?***
Aug 13, 2011, 9:44 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1325]
TigerPulse: 87%
28
|
Clemson is better now, and has been better for a while than
Aug 13, 2011, 9:44 PM
|
|
teams like Ole ####, Vandy, Kentucky, and Mississippi State.
We've obviously been South Carolina's DADDIES for 100+ years.
I fully expect us to beat Auburn this year, and we should have beaten then last year when we had them on the ropes.
We'll be playing UGA 2013 and 2014 (Granted they have been better than us in the head-to-head rivarly though all time).
Last time we played Tennessee we kicked their ###, and they aren't very good these days.
If you're scared of the SEC, then good for you. Me? Not so much...
Go Tigers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1325]
TigerPulse: 87%
28
|
I'll give you FL, Bama, and LSU.. that's it.. Screw the SEC***
Aug 13, 2011, 9:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4109]
TigerPulse: 80%
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [1271]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Why are you scared?!!!
Aug 13, 2011, 9:53 PM
|
|
It's freaking football man! How does a program get better if you don't play anybody?! I'm not saying all of the teams in the ACC are trash , but come on! No need to be cowards. We're talking smash mouth football and a butt load of money!
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7930]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
Posts: 13705
Joined: 2002
|
so let's be scared and continue to play Wake and Duke***
Aug 13, 2011, 9:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [3014]
TigerPulse: 96%
33
|
Clemson was smaller than some mid-major schools back then
Aug 13, 2011, 9:58 PM
|
|
in comparison to today. You have to remember that Clemson did most of it's substantial growth during the 1970's. Clemson's grad school opened in 1982 I think.
Clemson was also generally a non-conference home game for most of those SEC schools (away games for us), and was again smaller than some mid-major universities are today. It did make a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2440]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Clemson was smaller than some mid-major schools back then
Aug 13, 2011, 9:59 PM
|
|
Are you talking about a specific grad school?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [3014]
TigerPulse: 96%
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [929]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Just to make us look better
Aug 13, 2011, 10:09 PM
|
|
South Carolina vs Alabama (3-12) .200
South Carolina vs Arkansas (7-12) .368
South Carolina vs Auburn (1-8-1) .150
South Carolina vs Florida (5-23-3) .210
South Carolina vs Georgia (15-46-2) .254
South Carolina vs Kentucky (14-7-1) .659
South Carolina vs LSU (2-16-1) .132*
South Carolina vs Mississippi State (7-6) .538
South Carolina vs Ole Miss (7-8) .467
South Carolina vs Tennessee (5-22-2) .207
South Carolina vs Vanderbilt (16-4) .800#
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [223]
TigerPulse: 74%
13
|
although these records are correct they also took place
Aug 13, 2011, 10:12 PM
|
|
a long time ago for the most part. The only time I remember playing Tennessee we won. Most of these Auburn, Alabama games and most of the others took place before 1970, so really its a mute point to make.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [32]
TigerPulse: 17%
4
|
My first time in the t-net pool folks!!.................
Aug 13, 2011, 10:34 PM
|
|
I think what is more relevant is what is our record against SEC teams, while those teams are members of the SEC. If we are so intent on building up SEC teams to be all that, those teams are only all that while a member of the all-mighty SEC. We assume that being in the SEC makes teams more competitive, gives them a competitive advantage over other schools.....So, as a non-SEC team (arky, usce, etc) they would not count for/against our record vs SEC teams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 2453
|
|
|
50
