|
Replies: 40
| visibility 8316
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 44814
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
3
Jul 31, 2024, 6:10 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1575]
TigerPulse: 100%
30
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
3
Jul 31, 2024, 6:20 PM
|
|
P Woods playing edge at 319 doesn't add up to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Protector [1450]
TigerPulse: 100%
29
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
2
Jul 31, 2024, 7:24 PM
|
|
CW played DE when we had lack of depth. He has the skill to play anywhere on the line it’s only for depth reasons and he probably still will play some DT
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19144]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 14779
Joined: 2010
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Jul 31, 2024, 10:30 PM
|
|
2018 42 Christian Wilkins DL 6-4 / 310 Senior 3VL Springfield, MA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2102]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
Sep 7, 2024, 11:29 AM
|
|
Christian played DE his junior year not senior year I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1142]
TigerPulse: 86%
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4380]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Better than a 6'6" WR in the slot...
2
Jul 31, 2024, 9:13 PM
|
|
If you watch Pwoo this season and say he sucks at DE I’ll eat my words. I’m willing to bet he plays well at DE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [728]
TigerPulse: 81%
22
|
Re: Better than a 6'6" WR in the slot...
1
Jul 31, 2024, 10:04 PM
|
|
If you watch Pwoo this season and say he sucks at DE I’ll eat my words. I’m willing to bet he plays well at DE.
Woods and Parker are our two best pash rushers. Only makes sense to get them on the edge not to mention that we have more depth at DT. Starters are great at DE and LB but it drops off fast with back ups. Fingers crossed that injuries are kept to a minimum at these spots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [88713]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 24654
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16977]
TigerPulse: 95%
51
Posts: 25953
Joined: 2006
|
moore clocking in at 198 on day one. nice***
2
Jul 31, 2024, 6:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1734]
TigerPulse: 96%
31
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Jul 31, 2024, 6:39 PM
|
|
With some of the skill players coming in lighter hoping this translates into more speed. What would be good to see also would be last year weight room numbers to this year. GO TIGERS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14338]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 10449
Joined: 1999
|
I was thinking the same thing...
4
Jul 31, 2024, 8:00 PM
|
|
Antonio Williams is 8lbs lighter and Cole Turner is 2lb lighter. 2 of the fastest guys on the team.
However, Jay Haynes was 185 last year and he's 200 this year. If it's all muscle and he didn't loos speed, then he's setting him self up nicely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [58406]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 23048
Joined: 2005
|
Sooooo many names I don't recognize at all....
2
Jul 31, 2024, 7:24 PM
|
|
Crazy what the walk on party of the program really is.
I hope we can play like a few games back in the day, at home, and all these no names get to make some plays because we're up so much against the opponent!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [309]
TigerPulse: 98%
15
|
Re: Sooooo many names I don't recognize at all....
2
Jul 31, 2024, 7:38 PM
|
|
Well they weigh every guy on the roster and there’s like 50 walk-ons lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6640]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: Sooooo many names I don't recognize at all....
2
Jul 31, 2024, 7:51 PM
[ in reply to Sooooo many names I don't recognize at all.... ] |
|
That fella from Greer is 6'9" 364, sure he wants to get the chance to road grade in some blowouts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [309]
TigerPulse: 98%
15
|
Re: Sooooo many names I don't recognize at all....
2
Aug 1, 2024, 9:05 AM
|
|
He wasn't even a PWO, he was a tryout kid. I wonder if he actually had to do any reps in the tryout of if the coaches just saw him walk-in at 6'9" 364 and said "yeah we'll take you."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1386]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
2
Jul 31, 2024, 8:19 PM
|
|
Randel at 231 is pretty nice if that’s good weight. He’s really going to be hard to bully and be a force when going up and fighting for the ball. Also Moore gaining 9 and wesco 12 is very nice. I wanna see big 355 Pennington making some holes this year!! Luke was talking good about him this off-season so maybe he hs recovered from the acl and with actual coaching hopefully he’s made a big leap. Go Tigers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1142]
TigerPulse: 86%
26
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Jul 31, 2024, 9:07 PM
|
|
to weigh less than 220 lbs.(& run sub 4.4s in the 40)
With that much muscle mass, you sacrifice some stamina and short area quickness. 'Olympian' body type on a WR is known to be tightly wound, constricted therefore possibly more vulnerable to injury, although there is no sample size for the assertion. (David Boston, Rendrick Taylor)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4683]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
2
Jul 31, 2024, 9:32 PM
|
|
Was anyone else hopeful that Phil Mafah would have lost more than 2 pounds before the start of the season or nah?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1594]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
Aug 1, 2024, 7:52 AM
|
|
I would bet that converted to muscle, which methinks is a scarier Mafah coming down the chute into linebackers at full speed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26833]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 12695
Joined: 2014
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Jul 31, 2024, 9:34 PM
|
|
What stood out to me is that a lot of the DL and DEs have gained weight and a lot of the OL are coming in slightly lighter than the last weighing. Not all, but enough to look like a trend for both groups. I hope this means the OL have been working on footwork and quickness because it seemed like last year there were a lot of times opposing defenders ran by our OL right off the snap. And I can’t wait to see our big DLs clogging up the middle and DEs and LBs making a lot of plays in the opponent’s backfield.
Spot the daggum ball!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6443]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Jul 31, 2024, 9:34 PM
|
|
Mafah at 230!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5429]
TigerPulse: 98%
38
|
Adam Randall at 62 231 lbs is no bueno
2
Jul 31, 2024, 9:52 PM
|
|
unless he’s transitioning to TE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2241]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
Re: Adam Randall at 62 231 lbs is no bueno
1
Aug 1, 2024, 12:33 PM
|
|
As Dabo said thats at like 5% body fat, meaning he is a walking running muscle. I'm sure he is where the coaches want him considering in that clip Dabo called him out by name in an impressed way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [309]
TigerPulse: 98%
15
|
Re: Adam Randall at 62 231 lbs is no bueno
3
Aug 1, 2024, 1:32 PM
|
|
Randall has always been a weight room example and a "first guy off the bus" type. I want to see something, anything, on the field. Until then he's a bodybuilder in pads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1035]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Aug 1, 2024, 12:17 AM
|
|
Ian Reed lost a lot of weight. Will that translate to him being quicker, more athletic in the line? What we would really like to know is the target weight set by coaches and trainers and how close the players came to that. Woods gained 4 lbs, but if he has not lost any speed, it will not hurt him at DE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5372]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Aug 1, 2024, 8:16 AM
|
|
Per Dabo's spring report he has some sort of chronic issue he's been dealing with since childhood. We should know something once Fall camp gets rolling about where he is health wise this year
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [406]
TigerPulse: 55%
17
|
did our projected starting OL lose weight???***
2
Aug 1, 2024, 6:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1594]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: did our projected starting OL lose weight???***
1
Aug 1, 2024, 7:46 AM
|
|
Depending on the final depth chart...
Leigh -6
Tate -9
Linthicum -3
Parks -6
Miller +4
Overall by my maths looks like we lost a net -8 lbs across the unit, with an average weight of 304.4lbs.
At first blush [general across the corps, not just the starters] it looks like the guys who needed more agility/speed/footwork improvements slimmed down, and we put some meat on the lighter doods.
Message was edited for clarifucation by: WarDaddy17®
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4427]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: did our projected starting OL lose weight???***
2
Aug 1, 2024, 8:24 AM
|
|
Seems like we're going with more agility on the O-line this year, they gotta be able to move. Probably going more up-tempo this season and running the ball alil more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1594]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: did our projected starting OL lose weight???***
1
Aug 1, 2024, 11:12 AM
|
|
I sure like the sound of that!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [406]
TigerPulse: 55%
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1594]
TigerPulse: 99%
30
|
Re: Im now very concerned
Aug 1, 2024, 11:19 AM
|
|
Historically we've been an undersized unit. We've had talent for sure but a lot of that has not come with size that carried over to the next level. I remember when we played the bucknuts in their (6) game season to playoff, the announcers mentioned our average line size was something like 2-3 inches and 20-25 lbs less than that of the OSU O-line.
I think Matt Luke knows where to get the meat, and the last round of recruiting has shown us reaching beyond 3-Stars in the Carolinas for some corn-fed boys.
I think the days of Clemson's OL = Oompa Loompa's is quickly coming to an end; no disrespect to previous teams at all, O-Line is the most undervalued critical position and we have had a lot of Bad-A dudes come in and fight above their weight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4683]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Re: Im now very concerned
Aug 1, 2024, 9:40 PM
[ in reply to Im now very concerned ] |
|
In the past 20 years, Clemson has seen a total of 16 offensive linemen drafted or signed to NFL teams. As of 2024, only four of these former Clemson offensive linemen are currently on NFL rosters, and only 2 of those 4 are starters for their respective teams.
Our OL has been problematic… forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4427]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Aug 1, 2024, 8:25 AM
|
|
I really Like Mayo....6'7 265 has all the tools to be a stud on the edge. Our D-line is extremely Deep across the board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [964]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Any Concerns here - 12 WR Bryant Wesco Jr. 182 (170)
1
Aug 1, 2024, 10:22 AM
|
|
Would have thought you want some more bulk and muscle for durability. Coming in early and getting the off season weight program I didn't think he would have dropped weight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1386]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: Any Concerns here - 12 WR Bryant Wesco Jr. 182 (170)
1
Aug 1, 2024, 10:49 AM
|
|
He needed to add weight only being 170 coming into the spring. With his height 12 pounds is not a lot and prob bulked up some to play college.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [309]
TigerPulse: 98%
15
|
Re: Any Concerns here - 12 WR Bryant Wesco Jr. 182 (170)
1
Aug 1, 2024, 1:38 PM
[ in reply to Any Concerns here - 12 WR Bryant Wesco Jr. 182 (170) ] |
|
Dabo said he was in the 160s when he got here. 12 lbs of good weight is a lot for someone with that frame.
Tee Higgins plays on Sundays about 40 lbs heavier than when he was a senior in high school and it's taken him 7-8 years to get there. Wesco might not even sniff 200 lbs until he's 21-22 years old, assuming he's only adding good weight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5429]
TigerPulse: 98%
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27575]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 15639
Joined: 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top TigerNet [30294]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 17362
Joined: 2008
|
Re: TNET: Clemson football 'Big Weigh-In' results
1
Aug 1, 2024, 2:50 PM
|
|
Linthicum at 302 gives me hope that he could have that breakout season we've been waiting for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 40
| visibility 8316
|
|
|
50
