|
Replies: 28
| visibility 1
|
Oculus Spirit [83625]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63724
Joined: 12/31/06
|
looking for a good formula...
Mar 18, 2013, 3:47 PM
|
|
to evaluate the points per post ratio verified against the inverse of the Tigerpulse continuum, prorated to take into account the 2013 calendar year using the new standard for daylight savings time.
Anybody have a good one?
Take your time...I'm not that interested in it.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1132]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 1262
Joined: 11/30/98
|
E= mcsquared***
Mar 18, 2013, 4:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: looking for a good formula...
Mar 18, 2013, 4:24 PM
|
|
I think you will find your answer by typing 58008 into a calculator and turning it upside down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16183]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26481
Joined: 11/18/03
|
That's the same formula I use to do my taxes...***
Mar 18, 2013, 4:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [37023]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16328
Joined: 12/15/08
|
TP =
Mar 18, 2013, 4:24 PM
|
|
(Points per post/Total Days in Daylights savings time)*Crumps Point total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: TP =
Mar 18, 2013, 4:25 PM
|
|
Wait is it daylight savings time now? Or when you first started following the persons point count?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I gotta give it you clem117.........
Mar 18, 2013, 4:29 PM
|
|
You are trying hard. Still doesn't explain it or make it go away, but hopefully it opens your eyes to the sheer absurdity of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: I gotta give it you clem117.........
Mar 18, 2013, 4:33 PM
|
|
Yep you are really bad at math.
Lets say your numbers are right... I need 11 points a day to get your amazing numbers...
A quick search shows that i have averaged over 20 posts a day for the last 30 days.
I need .5 Points per post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Wrong clemmy.
Mar 18, 2013, 4:45 PM
|
|
But that's pretty common for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Wrong clemmy.
Mar 18, 2013, 4:55 PM
|
|
it is basic math even for you....
11.2 points per day. Which no one has anyway to verify but I will go with it.
11.2 x 30= 336.
A quick search of my posts in the last 30 days gives 573 results. Not counted in that are the numerous deletions due to me attacking Gamecocks. Also that is lower than normal due to a 1 week vacation in that stretch.
So I get a .586 Points per every Post...
Meanwhile your average is higher than that...
I think you have SCOKS!!!!! OMG OMG OMG look how high his average is!!!
Who cares jesus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Wrong clemmy.
Mar 18, 2013, 5:13 PM
|
|
and after being shown that your numbers were in fact complete #### you disappear...
who is shocked....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I'm sorry you're unable to comprehend, but I will try again.
Mar 18, 2013, 5:22 PM
|
|
I never once stated anything about a points per post ratio. You're confused.
I stated that you gained 11.22 points per day over a certain period of time, but those points aren't attached to the posts you made over that same period.
I honestly don't know how to explain it any clearer, but than again I shouldn't have to since you know exactly what I'm talking about.
It's a BIZARRE behavior clemmy. Please try harder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: I'm sorry you're unable to comprehend, but I will try again.
Mar 18, 2013, 5:24 PM
|
|
Hell I've probably gotten 20 points today alone.
You act like that is some astronomical number...
Fact is little buddy I dont have any Scoks. You did some half ### investigating using flawed logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Poor guy.
Mar 18, 2013, 5:29 PM
|
|
Denial looks good on you.
But really though, I hope whatever it is that ails you is helped by your points and pulse here. I hate to see a fellow tiger so desperate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: Poor guy.
Mar 18, 2013, 5:32 PM
|
|
"The guy has had a ton more points than posts over the last ~35 days." That is a direct quote from earlier by you.
I just showed that is in fact bull #### and now you are claiming post count doesn't matter.
Which is it pal?
You are just digging your pathetic little hole deeper with your obsession with me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Ok you got me on that quote.
Mar 18, 2013, 5:36 PM
|
|
My bad. That was an error on my part - you don't have more points than posts. However, my poor little friend, you do have this:
I stated that you gained 11.22 points per day over a certain period of time, but those points aren't attached to the posts you made over that same period.
You got me curious about another thing now Dodgie, how Does one dig a "whole"? Might want to edit that yet again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Much like you magical points....
Mar 18, 2013, 5:44 PM
|
|
"Whole" change to "hole".
One for the archives. Truly a classic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
Be careful Dave, you'll be going on vacation with GWP
Mar 18, 2013, 4:26 PM
[ in reply to TP = ] |
|
Or maybe you want to spend some quality time together? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
The magic formula is:
Mar 18, 2013, 4:26 PM
|
|
A-B=C.
HTH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: The magic formula is:
Mar 18, 2013, 4:27 PM
|
|
That explains why everyone is confused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16183]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26481
Joined: 11/18/03
|
My calculator only has numbers...Do I need an
Mar 18, 2013, 4:29 PM
|
|
SEC calculator to add letters?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
LOL. Right clem117, right.
Mar 18, 2013, 4:30 PM
[ in reply to Re: The magic formula is: ] |
|
You get it. In fact, you get it better than anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19352]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 22266
Joined: 4/25/04
|
Re: LOL. Right clem117, right.
Mar 18, 2013, 4:36 PM
|
|
lol you should really just stop buddy you are making a fool of yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
LOL. Right man. As long as that helps.
Mar 18, 2013, 4:44 PM
|
|
Is "Dodge" your middle name?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16183]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 26481
Joined: 11/18/03
|
Subtract 17 from 63...***
Mar 18, 2013, 4:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1321]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 2764
Joined: 11/27/11
|
Ok.. You'll have to follow this one carefully..
Mar 18, 2013, 4:32 PM
|
|
A= the number of posts in a given day
W= the number of days in the time period
S= Daylight saving time
C= is for the calendar.
R= the coefficient of points per post
H= total points
O= points received when no new posts are present
E= Modifiers for user bias
So we take the formula like this:
(W+H*O)/C-(A+R)+E(S)=?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Aaactually, the formula is much easier than that.
Mar 18, 2013, 4:43 PM
|
|
I'm sure you can follow along. Only those who took junior high math should continue.
A = points at date 1.
B = points at date 2.
C = A-B
And,
D = date 1 - date 2 (in days)
When C is far greater than the number of points gained in posts from the time period, D, then there are some bizarre shenanigans involved.
I'm not a teacher, but I do enjoy helping others. Let me know if something is not clear. Have a good one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3933]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4711
Joined: 9/2/03
|
two-tailed Chi-squared test at 99% confidence interval?***
Mar 18, 2013, 4:36 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [108390]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 64974
Joined: 2/25/06
|
which side of the plate do you swing from franc? might have
Mar 18, 2013, 4:45 PM
|
|
a certain poster in mind that could help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 28
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
