I've heard this argument but it is not a good one for the

Or defending one or the other... but I would imagine that the argument would go something like this:

Committing adultery, which causes the other spouse to rightfully and justifiably terminate the marriage covenant, is a one-time sin that the person can repent from and change their ways. The person who repents would receive forgiveness and agree to not continue to live in adultery and make a new covenant with God and their new spouse to live according to the "Christian/Biblical model" for marriage (which marriage in a church is a Christian custom by definition/origin).

Whereas, a homosexual person participating in a marriage ceremony/covenant in a church would 1) be making a covenant with God that would go directly against the very religion of the establishment in which they are ceremoniously participating. 2) Rather than repenting for a one time sin, they are committing to live in a lifetime of sin and NOT recognize it as such or repent from continuing it. I fully recognize that it's counter cultural to call homosexuality a sin nowadays... but I'm just saying that if you're asking why A CHURCH calls it that, it's because Christian churches SHOULD be using the word of God (the Bible) to identify right from wrong (sin), and the Bible calls homosexuality sin. That's their rules, whether we agree with them or not, and it's their church...

PS- Not a holier than thou Bible thumper, not judging anyone- I worry about my own house, we got plenty of our own splinters/logs in our eyes over here to take care of, and this is simply an explanation of the logic most church going people would probably offer.

CUintulsa®

Clemson Icon [25333]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 14482

Joined: 2001

Re: can you clarify? what is your position on churches

Aug 28, 2023, 8:58 PM

It's a fun question to think through. Basically, yes, I would agree with you both. If it is not the govt's business who is sleeping with who, it is not their business which of them are married.

But in a situation where the govt does marry people, can the Church claim that responsibility? If Bill and Suze got married in Mayberry by the High Sheriff And Justice Of The Peace in his living room, and then move to Greenville and join Gospel Outreach of Light and Faith, and they say they are married, can GOLF tell them they are not married and tell them to get separate rooms? Point is, churches accept govt marriage as valid in the church as the ones they perform.

Another question about non govt marriage: If we Christians believe marriage originated with Adam (I do, pardon the pun), and was later appropriately overseen by rabbis and such, and if the cross then tore the veil in two, establishing the priesthood of the believers, by what authority does a church organization marry me and MissTulsa? If we got a few of fellow Christians to attest that such a vow was made, can man put that asunder? [As it so happened, we got married in a Greenville church - we were happy pagans then - because they agreed to let us use the building and the minister, for a fair fee. Was that a marriage "by the church"? Hardly.]

Decades later I married, quite illegally, my sister and her husband. It was to be, at their request, a church ceremony, with Ephesians 5 and "whatever God has joined together" and all that, but with me as officient. Me, without a speck of church authority; no ordination, no nothing, not even a sunday school teacher. I was hesitant because I would sign the license, and didnt want any blowback on them. Or me. But my sister, a lawyer, said, "It dont matter. When you send in the marriage license the next day, and the clerk records it, we're married. After that, nothing matters. Just do it." Same as if the GOLF guy sent it in. That's how civil it is: literally a rubber stamp.

Anyway, how could that be unrolled? The govt just saying "we're out of it"?

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Should churches marry previously divorced people?

Churches should be allowed to marry whomever they want.***

Absolutely! There’s a church down near Aynor

now 'Try That in a Large Town'

Wow. Only a 3-day vacation? That was fast***

Think a bribe was involved?***

please don't appoint a special counsel***

I agree with you so long as the inverse is also true:

Are people posting in the wrong place intentionally ?

who knew there were so many board-nazi karens in here***

Re: who knew there were so many board-nazi karens in here***

careful, you can get a nasty-Graham for something like that

Bruh, I didn't RA you. I think it was you telling me to

I certainly apologize

between you and me...

it seems that Father G cares deeply about keeping

He’s not the only one***

They make car horns for a reason.***

if meist would code a stering wheel capable of a U-Turn that

I think you think I care more than I do

what I care about is RA campaigns by Father G***

Re: I certainly apologize

actually, it is your unjust opinion that you have

Whatever nerd***

Yes to both questions, though, for those who

Not advocating for one or the other

You're assuming homosexuality is a sin.

It largely depends on what you and your church

I've asked a lot of question of God in my lifetime.

According strictly to the Bible? No one likes the answers.***

God's hand on our reigns is a blessing, APM.

Sure. And no church and no person other than arguably Jesus

Re: Sure. And no church and no person other than arguably Jesus

WE'RE all full on evil.

No. Churches are buildings.

also no bathrooms in the churches

What’s the difference?

in some faiths, marriage is a Sacrament***

Understand completely,

Isn't that basically what the Tudors was all about?

I thought The Tudors was about seeing

Natalie was why I watched****

There is none and churches and govenment have no business...

can you clarify? what is your position on churches

Re: can you clarify? what is your position on churches

The ideal scenario is that government process/recognizes

Re: The ideal scenario is that government process/recognizes

Only the civil union would have legal standing.

lol the government has accommodations for such conditions.

They would be your concern if you were gay only a few years

If two men love one another they can live in adultry like...

Government has no place to deny them a civil

I agree. I'm a stanch believe that the government should...

Re: They would be your concern if you were gay only a few years

I'm narrow minded.

Re: Should churches marry previously divorced people?

Re: Should churches marry previously divorced people?

TigerBoard POTD