|
Replies: 21
| visibility 1
|
All-In [26765]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15299
Joined: 10/12/08
|
It's WAAAAAAY Past Time For The ACC To Move Clemson
Nov 24, 2013, 9:21 AM
|
|
to the Coastal Div. and put either GT or VT in the Atlantic Div. The two best teams in the ACC should not be in the same Div. That foolishness results in one of the best teams being left out of the ACCCG.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1571]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1857
Joined: 9/8/02
|
That is the way Swoffie wants it you see where his beloved
Nov 24, 2013, 9:27 AM
|
|
Tar Holes reside.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83262]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80210
Joined: 11/29/99
|
LOL***
Nov 24, 2013, 3:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1589]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 1513
Joined: 9/6/05
|
move Miami over
Nov 24, 2013, 9:30 AM
|
|
and we could play GT and VT every year. Both would be fun games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4854]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9113
Joined: 1/15/08
|
Yep switch Miami and FSU.
Nov 24, 2013, 11:31 AM
|
|
Also switch BC and GT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [591]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 1333
Joined: 11/29/11
|
Never happen. Look at Alabama and LSU.
Nov 24, 2013, 9:50 AM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [381]
TigerPulse: 77%
Posts: 376
Joined: 9/10/11
|
Re: Never happen. Look at Alabama and LSU.
Nov 24, 2013, 10:10 AM
|
|
Y'all act like this has been this way for 10 years. Clemson and Florida St haven't been this good at the same time until the last couple years. Things change over time. How many years has the ACC champ came from the coastal division? The Techs ran this league for a while. What do you want to do, change divisions every time someone else steps up?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12937
Joined: 4/18/12
|
You just had to go and ruin all the fun by making sense***
Nov 24, 2013, 3:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5154]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5829
Joined: 8/7/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [534]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 159
Joined: 11/30/98
|
When expansion happened to include Miami....
Nov 24, 2013, 10:17 AM
|
|
They were thinking that the championship game would typically include Them and FSU
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [639]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3848
Joined: 8/13/09
|
Re: When expansion happened to include Miami....
Nov 24, 2013, 10:44 AM
|
|
I would rather see what I call fluid divisions.
That would allow the divisions to be created by performance every year, rather than being predetermined.
That way, the best 2 teams will play in the championship game every year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13057]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22374
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Only if teams replicated results from year to year which
Nov 24, 2013, 10:55 AM
|
|
definitely does not always happen. VT has the best league record in 2011 and was a turd in 2012. We probably still would've had Clemson and FSU in the same division last year using your method. It would have worked this year though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [639]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3848
Joined: 8/13/09
|
Re: When expansion happened to include Miami....
Nov 24, 2013, 2:56 PM
[ in reply to Re: When expansion happened to include Miami.... ] |
|
This is not just an issue with the ACC.
Alabama & Auburn (or LSU) are likely the best 2 teams in the SEC this year IMO.
I think most people would much rather see either team play in the championship game than watch Missouri or South Carolina.
Fluid Divisions (and regional conferences) would make college football much better IMO. I think it would be much easier to let the cream rise to the top and keep historic/traditional rivalries. (while adding new ones)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1099]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 2494
Joined: 10/15/13
|
Re: It's WAAAAAAY Past Time For The ACC To Move Clemson
Nov 24, 2013, 10:47 AM
|
|
If you do that, then you can't have 2 ACC teams in the NC game because one of them will have a late loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14090]
TigerPulse: 78%
Posts: 25448
Joined: 7/28/05
|
How about this instead...
Nov 24, 2013, 10:49 AM
|
|
have the two teams with the highest BCS rankings face off in the ACC championship game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [396]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 716
Joined: 11/23/02
|
way too logical for Swoffturd and the ACC powers that be***
Nov 24, 2013, 3:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [639]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3848
Joined: 8/13/09
|
Re: way too logical for Swoffturd and the ACC powers that be***
Nov 24, 2013, 3:11 PM
|
|
That's what fluid divisions (based on performance) would do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13057]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22374
Joined: 4/24/04
|
This has only been the case for 2 years. For the majority
Nov 24, 2013, 10:50 AM
|
|
of the time since the league split into divisions the Atlantic has been the turd half of the league routinely sending 8-4/9-3 type teams with 2-3 ACC losses to the title game.
Realigning divisions like that is short sighted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [1051]
TigerPulse: 31%
Posts: 3302
Joined: 6/10/12
|
Re: It's WAAAAAAY Past Time For The ACC To Move Clemson
Nov 24, 2013, 11:30 AM
|
|
how about we just beat WHOEVER is in our divison and win the acc championship game and PROVE on the field we are the best. I know this is a very novel idea but I think we need to quit trying to justify a loss and just admit we got blown out at home and are not the best team in our own division. we need to be more realistic and less delusional about fsu. to ever be the BEST we have to beat the teams we play, and if we lose, learn to admit it and live with it. ok, maybe live with it 5 out of 10 times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83262]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80210
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Miami will be very good again in two years.***
Nov 24, 2013, 3:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [83262]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80210
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Also, what difference does it make this year, losing to FSU
Nov 24, 2013, 3:11 PM
|
|
in Oct or Dec?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [441]
TigerPulse: 34%
Posts: 1346
Joined: 1/2/13
|
They can't keep rearranging the divisions based on who's hot
Nov 24, 2013, 3:13 PM
|
|
right now. It wasn't that long ago that VA Tech was winning the ACC repeatedly. If you move us over there and they get hot again, then we are right back where we started.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
