|
Replies: 21
| visibility 2413
|
National Champion [7234]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13763
Joined: 2015
|
Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
3
Mar 16, 2025, 12:14 AM
|
|
With 1% chance of a 1 seed. Maybe we do end up a 3 seed. I was thinking 4 or 5 but I'd be thrilled with a 3.
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [27505]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 12298
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
4
Mar 16, 2025, 12:18 AM
|
|
It doesn't matter. Just win baybeeee! Remember the days of not going to the dance? The Legend is taking us places. 🤘
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7234]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13763
Joined: 2015
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
4
Mar 16, 2025, 12:21 AM
|
|
I think we can bear anybody but I'd rather play a team like McNeese St then play Vanderbuilt or another decent power 5 school in the 1st round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27505]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 12298
Joined: 1998
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
3
Mar 16, 2025, 12:42 AM
|
|
do or do not.... there is no try. Bring it on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2750]
TigerPulse: 75%
33
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
3
Mar 16, 2025, 12:26 AM
|
|
2 or 3 is no real difference. But 4 is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50214]
TigerPulse: 76%
58
Posts: 36790
Joined: 2003
|
I do not see how we will be a 2 seed.
1
4
Mar 16, 2025, 1:00 AM
|
|
I would be thrilled with a 3 seed, but 4 seems more likely.
I would like to avoid the 5 seed due to the propensity for 12 seeds to upset 5 seeds for some reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [79838]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 29505
Joined: 2018
|
Im going 4 with the loss of Dillion
3
Mar 16, 2025, 1:03 AM
|
|
if it’s considered
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12732]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
Re: Im going 4 with the loss of Dillion
1
Mar 16, 2025, 1:21 AM
|
|
This stinks but I'm still thinking a 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7234]
TigerPulse: 96%
42
Posts: 13763
Joined: 2015
|
Re: I do not see how we will be a 2 seed.
Mar 16, 2025, 10:10 AM
[ in reply to I do not see how we will be a 2 seed. ] |
|
Me either. I was shocked to see that. I'm guessing a 4 seed. If we would have beat Louisville maybe a 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18397]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 17254
Joined: 2004
|
Re: I do not see how we will be a 2 seed.
Mar 16, 2025, 10:52 AM
[ in reply to I do not see how we will be a 2 seed. ] |
|
I would be thrilled with a 3 seed, but 4 seems more likely.
I would like to avoid the 5 seed due to the propensity for 12 seeds to upset 5 seeds for some reason.
They were a 5 seed in 2019 when they beat the 12th seeded New Mexico State Aggies. I think this team will be motivated where it doesn't matter enough after how the got the shaft at the ACCT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet Elite [72655]
TigerPulse: 100%
61
Posts: 43233
Joined: 2004
|
as a 1%er myself, I'm thinking we deserve that #1 seed.
3
Mar 16, 2025, 1:27 AM
|
|
We were going to win the ACC, which is NOT having a down year, until the so-called "refs" decided to take it from us. The NCAA committee probably saw the same thing that we all did. This 1% chance reflects that. if the committee has any guts, they will make the obvious call. Have some faith, Tigers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [697]
TigerPulse: 72%
21
|
Re: as a 1%er myself, I'm thinking we deserve that #1 seed.
1
Mar 16, 2025, 10:10 AM
|
|
Are you for real? We are a lock for a 5 seed . The committee saw a team that can’t shoot , can’t take care of the ball , and benefitted from a historically weak ACC. We lost to the worst team in the SEC that won only 1 conference game all year . To think we get anything better than a 5 seed is just crazy. Don’t know how we can be a higher seed than a Louisville team that beat us twice ! The refs hurt but a team that goes on 2 separate 6 minute scoring droughts, shoots less than 20% from 3 for the 4th straight game , and commits a boatload of high school like turnovers has no one to blame but themselves .
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [50214]
TigerPulse: 76%
58
Posts: 36790
Joined: 2003
|
Bookmarking your post for future reference.***
1
Mar 16, 2025, 10:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [788]
TigerPulse: 97%
22
|
Re: Bookmarking your post for future reference.***
1
Mar 17, 2025, 10:08 AM
|
|
5 seed book marked so noted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Warrior [4754]
TigerPulse: 100%
37
|
Doing a force ranking, I see us as a 4 or 5.
1
Mar 16, 2025, 5:36 AM
|
|
I throw out the record and ask, if we played on neutral court, who would likely win 2 out of 3? There are some pretty strong and physical teams out there. This is separate from the rankings we see weekly.
This by no means says we can’t beat most teams in a one game scenario. Fouls, injuries, matchups, hot shooting, etc all contribute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [697]
TigerPulse: 72%
21
|
Re: Doing a force ranking, I see us as a 4 or 5.
Mar 16, 2025, 10:13 AM
|
|
Louisville proved that we don’t like a physical game and SMU did the same and almost beat us also. The cats out of the bag, just bully us around hit us in the mouth , and we will fold . South Carolina did the same to us and knocked us off our game also .
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18397]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 17254
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Doing a force ranking, I see us as a 4 or 5.
1
Mar 16, 2025, 11:11 AM
|
|
Louisville proved that we don’t like a physical game and SMU did the same and almost beat us also. The cats out of the bag, just bully us around hit us in the mouth , and we will fold . South Carolina did the same to us and knocked us off our game also .
Clemson is one of the most physical teams around. That is what Louisville Coach said after the game last night. All College Basketball experts says that especially with Shieff and Vik. That's how they beat Duke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21726]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14562
Joined: 2024
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
Mar 16, 2025, 10:15 AM
|
|
I would be thrilled with a 4 seed. That's about as good as I think we are anyway. 3 would be amazing though. I am expecting 4 or a 5 and wong worry about it either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [788]
TigerPulse: 97%
22
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
Mar 16, 2025, 11:06 AM
|
|
Sports Illustrated and Lunardi has us as 5, Jerry Palm has us at 6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [788]
TigerPulse: 97%
22
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
Mar 16, 2025, 11:11 AM
|
|
On3 has us at 5 too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18397]
TigerPulse: 95%
52
Posts: 17254
Joined: 2004
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
Mar 16, 2025, 11:14 AM
|
|
Don't go by those two clowns. One of highest 5 seeds at least by the best site to go to:
http://www.bracketmatrix.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [788]
TigerPulse: 97%
22
|
Re: Team rankings website has us as a 2 seed
Mar 16, 2025, 11:37 AM
|
|
so bracketmatrix agree's with the clowns?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 2413
|
|
|
50
