Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
The policeman should not have put...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 1

The policeman should not have put...


Jun 13, 2013, 10:55 PM

a mere $500 on the report. It's being reported that way on news sites. Sounds to me more like the custom lockbox / lock was about that. I'm sure the manhours of the investigation will be much more than that, not to mention damage to a cultural / historical artifact.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The policeman should not have put...


Jun 13, 2013, 11:01 PM

More like he should have listed the items separately... $500 for the lockbox and priceless for the piece. It is incredible how low someone is willing to go.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I was wearisome about that too


Jun 13, 2013, 11:46 PM

But what kind of value can you seriously put on trees in Auburn than maybe the price if its refined wood? It may not matter in terms of conviction. I wondered why the police report didn't say it was forced entry. Wouldn't it have been trespassing and forced entry into the case?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I was wearisome about that too


Jun 14, 2013, 12:25 AM

Unless it was a contractor who was allowed in there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I was wearisome about that too


Jun 14, 2013, 12:36 AM [ in reply to I was wearisome about that too ]

The reason that $500 was put b/c ..........was stated by the police on scout site ........they don't know the eventual amount. this is normally handled by insurance co or judge if someone is caught......It is just an estimated amount. This is normal. I wouldn't put too much in that part of the report.
On the charges those are just preliminary. The forced "entry" of the protective cover falls under vandalism, or icould see putting a charge of malicious injury. There was a good article on the TCI site that goes in depth of potential charges.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 1
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

NIL $ Ranked by Team

by Pig®

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic