Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Future of ACC hinges on one thing only
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 18
| visibility 1,280

Future of ACC hinges on one thing only


Nov 28, 2012, 10:24 AM

the lawsuit against Maryland. If Maryland can get out of the 50 million dollar exit fee, the ACC will implode. If not, it will remain and and 2-3 more teams. Biggest issue ACC faces is one that is not correctable, and that's geography. We just happen to share territory with the SEC, and they will always generate far more money. No other conference is in direct geographical competition with them, as 8 ACC schools are. Their really is not a good option for these 8 schools as far as realignment goes, as they will geographically isolated no matter where they moved, other than the SEC. Only real hope is to improve in football across the board, and that is unlikely any time soon. Sadly, we are in a place with very few options, so the best option is fight for a stronger ACC that holds together.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The ACC took a team the SEC turned down, not good***


Nov 28, 2012, 10:28 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

WE are a team the SEC turned down. geez***


Nov 28, 2012, 10:29 AM



badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Mississippi Tiger --------- Clemson University - 8 Time National Football Champions - 1900, 1906, 1948, 1950, 1981, 1983, 2016, 2018


Re:Kentucky did not want another loss,***


Nov 28, 2012, 10:31 AM [ in reply to Re: The ACC took a team the SEC turned down, not good*** ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The ACC took a team the SEC turned down, not good***


Nov 28, 2012, 10:43 AM [ in reply to Re: The ACC took a team the SEC turned down, not good*** ]

The SEC is already in Kentucky is why no offer was extended. It's all about new TV sets. Not new schools!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Agree. Other than that what is holding any of this together?


Nov 28, 2012, 10:28 AM

ND=NOT!
Basketball, basketball, basketball--Perhaps
Football-LOL.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Maryland WILL get out for less than $50 million.


Nov 28, 2012, 10:32 AM

They are leaving one way or another. Assuming they could not get out for less than $50 million they are gone anyway. Not unless you believe the move to secure Louisville is contingent on Maryland being successful leaving the ACC.

Personally, I don't give a frap about the ACC. I've been wishing for years that we leave.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


The money is the key


Nov 28, 2012, 10:38 AM

Maryland's AD is broke. Now, they are going to have to pony up possibly millions of dollars in attorney fees to fight this battle, while the ACC will divide those fees. The ACC cannot compromise as that will mean the league blows up. This is a do or die proposition for the ACC. Every current member knows if Maryland gets out of the fee, the league implodes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

But Maryland is gone already.


Nov 28, 2012, 10:46 AM

If they were not then they would not be voting already to add Louisville.

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


That's not the issue . . .


Nov 28, 2012, 10:48 AM

the issue is the fee, not their departure. If the fee is avoided, then other ACC members know that if they want to leave, the cost of doing such won't be prohibitive.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

But will their be a financial penalty for leaving?


Nov 28, 2012, 10:55 AM [ in reply to But Maryland is gone already. ]

The 50 million is the roadblock to future attrition. Maryland cannot afford that, they are broke, which means if it is enforced, they B1G will have to help a lot. If it is enforced, a mass exodus to the Big XII(our only other option) is less likely as you multiply the number of schools by 50 mil. Only way Big XII is feasible for us is with multiple partners in the move to insure realistic scheduling

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Future of ACC hinges on one thing only


Nov 28, 2012, 10:34 AM

All true except I am not sure the ACC should add the other teams. I think they should have stayed at 12 and only expand if ND can ever be forced to join a conference fulltime.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Future of ACC hinges on one thing only


Nov 28, 2012, 10:34 AM

Agree 100%.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

best option would be for the good football schools


Nov 28, 2012, 10:36 AM

in the ACC to jump to the Big XII and make a 18 school super conference with east and west divisions.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Can only do that if exit fee is reduced greatly


Nov 28, 2012, 10:44 AM

let's say that us, FSU, VT, NCST, GT, UM all decide to jump to Big XII. That's 300 million dollars in exit fees. Big XII can't help substantially with that, which means each school would have to pony up the bulk of it themselves. FSU's AD is in the red. Everything hinges on this lawsuit

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Then again, if a cash strapped school like Mary Land can


Nov 28, 2012, 11:04 AM

come up with 50 mill, then every school in the ACC should be able to do the same.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Tiger/Terrier


2 points


Nov 28, 2012, 11:08 AM

1) Maryland has the Under Armour guy as a benefactor
2) they are one school, the B1G could assist if they are forced to pay the 50 million. If they have to pay, then a partner deal to a conference like the Big XII becomes a 100, 150, 200, 300 million dollar proposition. Not much a conference can do to help if the dollar figures get that high

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2 points


Nov 28, 2012, 11:47 AM

It all depends on how you move. If you move a team or two at the time to other conferences then the fee is not really a problem as long as the two additions added enough to the new conference to make each team there 2 million more a year, and that's really a minimal number. Most leagues are at least 14 by now. That means they simply do not receive a raise for your addition for three years. That's 42 million of your 50. If you can't swing 8 you are in trouble. At the end of three years everybody gets the raise.

The other way is prior to a mass exodus make sure you have a 3/4's majority to dissolve the ACC. That's why Swafford is adding teams in advance. He wants to avoid a vote to either eliminate the 50 million or to dissolve. That's likely why Syracuse and Pitt already have a say. Otherwise 8 get's you out.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Actually, 9 votes is 3/4 right now, not 8


Nov 28, 2012, 11:51 AM

which means solidarity on tobacco road blocks anything

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 18
| visibility 1,280
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic