|
Replies: 25
| visibility 51
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 48607
Joined: 2012
|
FB Update: Athlon Sports prediction on Clemson-OU
Dec 28, 2014, 9:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Heisman Winner [83802]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 63794
Joined: 2007
|
I don't see how we can be predicted to win...
Dec 28, 2014, 9:59 AM
|
|
with Stoudt at QB. However I think it's a low scoring game
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Starter [371]
TigerPulse: 79%
16
|
Re: I don't see how we can be predicted to win...
Dec 28, 2014, 10:32 AM
|
|
I agree. I think it will be more like a 17-10 type of game, in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [34259]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 16377
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [8244]
TigerPulse: 100%
43
|
Re: FB Update: Athlon Sports prediction on Clemson-OU
Dec 28, 2014, 10:06 AM
|
|
I will take our Tigers & 10 points all day
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Scout Team [88]
TigerPulse: 92%
9
|
And I think I'll take
Dec 28, 2014, 10:22 AM
|
|
the under on OU scoring 27 points.
I just don't see it happening with our D. They may win, but it will be a low scoring game.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Campus Hero [13219]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 10641
Joined: 2002
|
Re: And I think I'll take
Dec 28, 2014, 10:31 AM
|
|
Did you see the GT game?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2487]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
GT had like 13 offensive points***
Dec 29, 2014, 11:15 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14959]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 24052
Joined: 2004
|
Gotta be careful about that though because, as we've seen
Dec 28, 2014, 11:18 AM
[ in reply to And I think I'll take ] |
|
before, the offense can make things significantly more difficult for the defense when they really struggle and make mistakes. We gave up a lot more points against Wake and GT than we should have due to bad turnovers and the inability to move the ball and stay on the field.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [5944]
TigerPulse: 100%
39
|
They may be right.
Dec 28, 2014, 10:23 AM
|
|
They probably aren't though.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24725]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 19228
Joined: 1998
|
I might be crazy - but it just may be a lunatic you're ...
Dec 28, 2014, 11:25 AM
|
|
a lunitic you're looking for!
Go Tigers - Beat the Sooners
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Starter [299]
TigerPulse: 99%
14
|
Re: FB Update: Athlon Sports prediction on Clemson-OU
Dec 28, 2014, 10:32 AM
|
|
Motivation? Again? WTH is it that the talking heads raise this question with all our bowl games and the opponents we play?Could it be that they put this out there so that they have something to fall back on just in case we actualy win the game?
I submit that we should the team that they are questioning OUR motivation! Geeeze.....
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
45
Posts: 17413
Joined: 2010
|
Re: FB Update: Athlon Sports prediction on Clemson-OU
Dec 28, 2014, 10:35 AM
|
|
Just as stingy? We give up 122 less yards and they are just as good? NOT!!!
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2428]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: FB Update: Athlon Sports prediction on Clemson-OU
Dec 28, 2014, 10:40 AM
|
|
It all comes down to turnovers. We create some, we win, we throw 3 picks and lose a fumble. we lose.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2594]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: FB Update: Athlon Sports prediction on Clemson-OU
Dec 28, 2014, 12:13 PM
|
|
I agree. If stout and company take our D out of the equation. We don't have a chance. But if stout moves the ball. Protects the ball and give the D time to rest, they can stop anyone. We need stouts best game. With Watson , we blow them out . We need a game from stout that we haven't seen from him. We need for him to just play smart. Protect the ball! And we can win.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Ultimate Tiger [34617]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 48931
Joined: 1999
|
Our D will do enough for the win.... but
Dec 28, 2014, 10:53 AM
|
|
our offense will not
20 - 16 Sooners
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 16363
Joined: 1998
|
That's the safe bet ... the smart bet ... but,
Dec 28, 2014, 10:54 AM
|
|
not a particularly adventurous prediction.
I say our defense stops the Sooners, gives us good field position and contributes a score ... Clemson 21-17 ...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Phenom [14959]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 24052
Joined: 2004
|
We have to play clean football though and be somewhat
Dec 28, 2014, 11:19 AM
|
|
efficient on offense or else we will give THEM great field position due to our inability to move the ball and flip the field.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Clemson Icon [24725]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 19228
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Game Changer [1653]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
they need to get behind cole!
Dec 28, 2014, 11:06 AM
|
|
I can't believe they would write that.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2483]
TigerPulse: 97%
32
|
How is OU's defense just as stingy as Clemson's when......
Dec 28, 2014, 11:23 AM
|
|
.....OU gives up 120+ more yards per game than Clemson? Don't think math is Athlon's forte....
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Standout [216]
TigerPulse: 97%
13
|
Re: How is OU's defense just as stingy as Clemson's when......
Dec 28, 2014, 11:38 AM
|
|
1=54. Now that's some SEC quality math.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1146]
TigerPulse: 98%
26
|
Re: How is OU's defense just as stingy as Clemson's when......
Dec 28, 2014, 11:52 AM
[ in reply to How is OU's defense just as stingy as Clemson's when...... ] |
|
> .....OU gives up 120+ more yards per game than > Clemson? Don't think math is Athlon's forte....
Because they face better offenses than we do. Just a fact.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Offensive Star [320]
TigerPulse: 95%
15
|
But not that much better. Big 12 offenses are way down
Dec 29, 2014, 1:05 AM
|
|
with Texas, Texas Tech, and Oklahoma State all underperforming badly. Compare TCU, Baylor, and K State to Georgia, FSU, and Georgia Tech, and I don't see much difference.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2487]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 16363
Joined: 1998
|
Always fun to look back at "Prediction" threads afterwards.
Dec 30, 2014, 5:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 25
| visibility 51
|
|
|