I understand after a loss, coaches and players talking about what they need to improve on. What bugs me, is the if we had made that play or not made that made mistake, then it would have been a _ score game going into the _ quarter. Well, the winning team could say the same thing, if we had not made this mistake or not dropped that ball, we would have been up by 35 points instead of 21 points going into the _ qtr. The point is that the talking heads only seem to look at the losing team's bad breaks or mistakes that could have helped them win or make it a closer game, and not factor in the same scenarios for the winning team