|
Replies: 34
| visibility 100
|
Orange Blooded [3523]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 3:49 PM
|
|
One word describes that nuthouse = deLOUsional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3523]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 3:53 PM
|
|
I know it will be hard to understand. The grammar is atrocious. But that's what we get from our midlands losers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23802]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 15384
Joined: 2004
|
Only a coot QB would have a first name for a last name.***
Aug 3, 2015, 3:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4300]
TigerPulse: 100%
36
|
Re: Only a coot QB would have a first name for a last name.***
Aug 4, 2015, 11:19 AM
|
|
I think that is a mistake. Somebody saw his name written as Conner, Mitch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [833]
TigerPulse: 97%
23
|
Yea, that one got me banned
Aug 3, 2015, 4:00 PM
|
|
Ridiculous post and they don't take criticism well
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3508]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Well done while it lasted! You were on point!***
Aug 4, 2015, 11:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
Connor Mitch for Heisman!***
Aug 3, 2015, 4:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TigerNet HOFer [126574]
TigerPulse: 100%
66
Posts: 57224
Joined: 2009
|
Connor Mitch for Heisman Jon
Aug 3, 2015, 4:11 PM
|
|
as in crapper
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2507]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Wow....I knew they were dumb but.....wow***
Aug 3, 2015, 4:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1858]
TigerPulse: 93%
31
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 4:06 PM
|
|
Just pure stupidity. Anybody that can make such a statement and still keep a straight face is an idiot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1211]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 4:23 PM
|
|
Thats just sad, those guys have no idea what they are talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [38595]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 33260
Joined: 2011
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 4:56 PM
|
|
Those guys looking for any reason not to be depressed over the current sad state of affairs that is Coot football ?
Shine that banner , boys ! 2015 is gonna suck to be you !
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1330]
TigerPulse: 100%
28
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 5:23 PM
|
|
THE LAST POSTER ON THE THREAD BROKE A BONE BRUSHING HIS TEETH.
Ladies and gentlemen, the gamecock intellect at work here.
Maybe he should refrain from any attempt at personal hygiene a) because he is clearly injury prone and b) he'll fit in better in the ol' chicken coop?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [19704]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 18027
Joined: 2012
|
Surprisingly most responses on that thread seem rational
Aug 3, 2015, 5:27 PM
|
|
The OP has some serious dumb over there though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1482]
TigerPulse: 95%
29
|
Re: Surprisingly most responses on that thread seem rational
Aug 3, 2015, 6:38 PM
|
|
Those are definitely some glass is half full folks.
There mom. . .I made it something nice to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [41658]
TigerPulse: 100%
57
Posts: 43343
Joined: 1998
|
Connor Mitch lifetime stats 2-6 for 19 yards
Aug 3, 2015, 7:02 PM
|
|
but it was against division 2 powerhouses Furman and South Alabama. Plus Spurrier challenged him to work out more and play x-box less. Be skered SEC be very skered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22964]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 13977
Joined: 2013
|
Not only did the Scar "D" disappear last year...
Aug 3, 2015, 7:13 PM
|
|
Apparently the "D" in Cole Stoudt, I mean Stout, did too. Dummies, I mean ummies.
And the arguments. So flawed! Watson didn't play well against Louisville when he was injured. GUESS WHAT?!? Most humans don't play to their potential when hurt, Einstein. Good grief!
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [32]
TigerPulse: 94%
4
|
Re: Not only did the Scar "D" disappear last year...
Aug 3, 2015, 9:53 PM
|
|
I agree with the Louisville assessment. That was the one game he played in that he never looked comfortable, even before the injury.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5486]
TigerPulse: 88%
38
|
Re: Not only did the Scar "D" disappear last year...
Aug 3, 2015, 1:51 PM
|
|
He never got the chance to adjust...he was out on the 3rd series. Grantham was showing him some stuff he had never seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [305]
TigerPulse: 100%
15
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 7:18 PM
|
|
I went there. I feel dirty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9504]
TigerPulse: 100%
44
|
Thanks for the comedy. Great reminder of why they are the
Aug 3, 2015, 8:34 PM
|
|
nations most delusional fan base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [580]
TigerPulse: 55%
20
|
Re: Thanks for the comedy. Great reminder of why they are the
Aug 3, 2015, 8:42 PM
|
|
I guess he should know. The media took one tackle clowney made and made him into a God. Unfortunately for that d a author, the td against georgia was one of his first passes in his first game in college and he had a ton more super human plays after that. Unlike Clowney, where his ridiculous tackle was against a Big Ten rb in a subpar team in a crap bowl. Hi
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5486]
TigerPulse: 88%
38
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 10:12 PM
|
|
God I hate QBs with two first names as a whole name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [97]
TigerPulse: 93%
10
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 3, 2015, 11:17 PM
|
|
That is the most laughable thing I've ever seen. DW4 has the highest ceiling of anyone in CFB
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [21278]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 12296
Joined: 2002
|
Re: DW4 vs Connor Mitch, per FGF
Aug 4, 2015, 3:52 AM
|
|
Connor Mitch did not impress me at all in their Spring Game. To put it mildly.
His stats were misleading - and not that great anyhow - mostly because the D couldn't touch him; if the defenders could have touched him he would have gotten buried for at least half a dozen car-crash blindside sacks.
He throws an OK mid-range ball...when he has time. But he has the pocket awareness of a statue, did not show the slightest awareness of the pass rush, did not step up or move in the pocket to avoid pressure, did not go through a progression, stared down his receiver, and had a slow, long-armed delivery to boot. He had an OK arm up to about 20-25 yards but he showed little zip or touch on his deeper throws. He did not show any athleticism or elusiveness. He looked, honestly, like a big, slow, classic pocket passer right out of the '80's or '90's.
All that would be bad enough if USC had an O-line, but they don't. Their OL looked leaky, unathletic, and completely out of shape, and much smaller than I'm used to seeing from USC in recent years.
I'd be surprised if Mitch lasted more than a game or two before Spurrier just shrugs and moves on. Mitch is likely going to take an absolute beating until that happens, and I don't see him being remotely effective. I saw absolutely nothing in his toolset that suggested he'd be successful at the level he's going to walk into. I was a bit shocked, actually, given the noise the Gamecock faithful have continually made about him...I expected to see something. I didn't.
Perry Orth, a former walk-on, looked better at the fundamentals, with a much quicker release, a much better ability to scan the field, and much better touch...the problem with Orth was he's tiny, with a very weak arm. A Good Head guy, obviously had an eye and feel for the game, but he did not look like an FCS-caliber athlete (or even close) to me. I could see Orth doing well at Coastal or Furman, but in the SEC? Maybe in limited doses. I'd hate to try to beat Georgia or Texas A&M with him.
Best guess is that Nunez gets pushed into action sooner rather than later. Might even be some combo of Orth, Nunez, and Pharaoh Cooper running the wildcat...I think Spurrier is likely already aware he really doesn't have a complete starting-caliber QB right now and will probably just go with a mix of packages to try to let his various QB's focus on what they do well. We've seen him do that in the past. In no way do I expect Spurrier's offense to be Fun...or Gun, this year, though, whatever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [48855]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 25010
Joined: 1999
|
I agree
Aug 4, 2015, 4:52 AM
|
|
Nunez will replace Mitch sooner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [276]
TigerPulse: 66%
14
|
Mitch has the tools
Aug 4, 2015, 8:48 AM
|
|
to be a very good QB but until he does something in a real game he is nothing more than an unproven commodity. All the star ratings and HS stats are meaningless until Mitch proves that he can play at this level. While Watson is definitely a stud he still needs to prove that he can stat healthy through an entire season. Personally I think the o-line play for both our teams is going to be the key factor to QB play and ability to stay healthy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [78308]
TigerPulse: 100%
62
Posts: 109760
Joined: 2003
|
Well, I just stopped when he said we overhyped Stoudt.
Aug 4, 2015, 8:58 AM
|
|
Actually he said Stout and I don't know who that is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3508]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
IKR.
Aug 4, 2015, 11:36 AM
|
|
That one idiot was claiming that we hyped Stoudt for Heisman. When the he!! did that happen? I know of no Tiger fans that had Cole as a Heisman hopeful. Where do they come up with this stuff?
I tried to log in and put in my 2 cents worth, but for the 5th time now, I've seemed to have received the banhammer for bringing actual facts to their previous threads of insanity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3508]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
My head just exploded. Coots are really this dumb folks.
Aug 4, 2015, 11:29 AM
|
|
Can't make these things up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [508]
TigerPulse: 85%
19
|
Re: If Connor Mitch were a Clemson Tiger
Aug 4, 2015, 3:51 PM
|
|
would he even beat out Nick Schuessler for 2nd spot behind DW?
I think it would be a close competition with a slight edge to Schuessler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Elite [5304]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: If Connor Mitch were a Clemson Tiger
Aug 4, 2015, 3:59 PM
|
|
Just to compare:
Schuessler:
2013 - 1/2 for 6 yds - 50% completion %, 3.00 YPA, long 6 yds (vs SC State) RAT 75.2
2014 - 7/8 for 47 yds - 87.5% completion %, 5.88 YPA, long 17 yds (vs SC State and NC State) RAT 136.9
Mitch:
2014 - 2/6 for 19 yds - 33.3% completion %, 3.17 YPA, long 14 yds (vs S. Alabama and Furman) RAT 59.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12327]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
Posts: 12618
Joined: 2003
|
couldn't click on link, forgot my hazmat suit today.***
Aug 4, 2015, 5:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [7097]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
surprisingly,
Aug 4, 2015, 5:13 PM
|
|
most of the replies aren't that bad lol. most of them are people telling him how stupid and naive he is. I guess some coots do have a brain.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 34
| visibility 100
|
|
|
50
