|
Replies: 26
| visibility 53
|
110%er [6821]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Coots are 17-24-3 ALL-TIME against Duke!!!!
Dec 7, 2013, 10:41 PM
|
|
Bwahahahahahaaaaa!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: Coots are 17-24-3 ALL-TIME against Duke!!!!
Dec 7, 2013, 10:46 PM
|
|
Now put it in context..... last time SC lost to Duke was 1983. Record is 10-3-1 over the last 14. Let's use stats from days of no forward passes and leather helmets to validate our feelings about the status quo!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2796]
TigerPulse: 99%
33
|
Re: Coots are 17-24-3 ALL-TIME against Duke!!!!
Dec 7, 2013, 10:48 PM
|
|
At least you don't try to confuse with your board username. Give you props for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: Coots are 17-24-3 ALL-TIME against Duke!!!!
Dec 7, 2013, 10:52 PM
|
|
Try to be transparent...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [63864]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 41297
Joined: 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: last 14? Clemson-USuCk are now 7-7 over the last 14.
Dec 7, 2013, 10:55 PM
|
|
I was referring to the SC-Duke series with that stat but I find yours very interesting as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [63864]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 41297
Joined: 2004
|
the point being you pick random spans of history since you
Dec 7, 2013, 10:58 PM
|
|
don't like the total story. Last nine before your little streak, we were 7-2 against the coots. Go figure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: the point being you pick random spans of history since you
Dec 7, 2013, 10:59 PM
|
|
I like modern day football, not padded rugby clubs full of white guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [63864]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 41297
Joined: 2004
|
racist.***
Dec 7, 2013, 11:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16698]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21759
Joined: 2007
|
Re: last 14? Clemson-USuCk are now 7-7 over the last 14.
Dec 7, 2013, 11:00 PM
[ in reply to last 14? Clemson-USuCk are now 7-7 over the last 14. ] |
|
It's very convenient to just pick and choose what we want history to include. I don't think it works that way for folks who live in a real world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1010]
TigerPulse: 95%
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: Er, you have to count em all
Dec 7, 2013, 11:00 PM
|
|
again, I like modern day football. Not padded rugby clubs with only white guys. Just keeping it in context.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Immortal [63864]
TigerPulse: 100%
60
Posts: 41297
Joined: 2004
|
i.e., don't go back past 2009.***
Dec 7, 2013, 11:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16698]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21759
Joined: 2007
|
Re: i.e., don't go back past 2009.***
Dec 8, 2013, 8:24 PM
|
|
That guy is not very smart, but he does fit in well with their historically selective fan base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [226]
TigerPulse: 92%
13
|
Re: Er, you have to count em all
Dec 7, 2013, 11:18 PM
[ in reply to Re: Er, you have to count em all ] |
|
IF.......YOU COUNT THEM ALL.....REFER back to year 1913 Clemson wins, 1914, Clemson wins, 1915, Clemson/USUC PLAYED TO A 0/0 TIE, YEAR 2016, CLEMSON WINS, YEAR 2017, CLEMSON WINS, YEAR 2018, CLEMSON WINS, & YEAR 2019, CLEMSON WINS;;;;CLEMSON WINS SIX TO NONE FOR USC, AND BY A COMBINE SCORE OF 164 TO 25.....(NOW MOVE FORWARD)
During years 1934 through 1940, Clemson wins 7 in a row, by a combined score of 198 to 31.......And, all games were played in Columbia......ALL GAMES AND WHO WINS AND LOSES STILL COUNTS....GO HOME ALL COOTS!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [53]
TigerPulse: 33%
6
|
I hope in 5 years you're still bragging about the 1940 win
Dec 7, 2013, 11:29 PM
|
|
and I'm bragging about the 2018 win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16698]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21759
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Er, you have to count em all
Dec 8, 2013, 8:35 PM
[ in reply to Re: Er, you have to count em all ] |
|
You gave them facts. They don't like that. Also, you pointed out that they had the home field advantage all those years. They won't like that either. You left off the lack of academic requirements they always have had or the difference in the quality of our players vs. theirs all through the years, but they don't like that either. You also left off the part where since spurlid has been there where their board of trustees has lowered their already very low academic standards to an even more embarrassing level to be able to compete with the others in their conference, and you also ignored the part about where they sign a bunch of players, and if some don't work out like they thought, they just revoke their scholarships, and on and on and on. Yep, there is much you left off, but who cares, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6821]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: There it goes... that history lesson I'm telling you....
Dec 7, 2013, 11:02 PM
|
|
You're easy to entertain... and I'm not the one validating my team with win or vicarious losses that occurred before my parents were born.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6821]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
No, you're the one entertaining yourself...
Dec 7, 2013, 11:37 PM
|
|
...on your rival's message board.
GET A LIFE!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2537]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
Re: History is what's remembered! sorry cootie...
Dec 7, 2013, 11:04 PM
|
|
Yeah, the romans certainly loved their history of success and didn't want it to change... but it did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [6782]
TigerPulse: 100%
41
|
Duke fans haven't figured out how to dribble a football.***
Dec 7, 2013, 11:08 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paw Master [16698]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 21759
Joined: 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
49
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2011
|
That's funny right there
Dec 7, 2013, 11:02 PM
|
|
Wake Forest has a more storied history than Scar
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2537]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: That's funny right there
Dec 7, 2013, 11:03 PM
|
|
Rutgers...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 26
| visibility 53
|
|
|
50
