|
Replies: 85
| visibility 3502
|
Webmaster [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
∞
Posts: 45049
Joined: 2012
|
TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Varsity [209]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:37 PM
|
|
Thanks for providing us the extra motivation to crush every time in our path from this point on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [209]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:38 PM
|
|
Sorry auto correct every team not every time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [992]
TigerPulse: 100%
24
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:48 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4 ] |
|
The fake sports news have been pushing this narrative for weeks. Things will change as 2 of the 4 top teams will lose at least 1 game. Nobody plays the underdog like Dabo and they gave him something to work with. The December 8 CFP poll is the one that matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [617]
TigerPulse: 98%
21
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:25 PM
|
|
Alabama and LSU will not drop out of the top 4 no matter what IMO!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [70]
TigerPulse: 97%
8
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 9:09 AM
|
|
Alabama and LSU will not drop out of the top 4 no matter what IMO!
No Alabama will never drop out. There will be a day when they have 2 losses and still be in the hunt for CFP. They will play a close game this weekend and then the loser will still be a 1-loss candidate over Clemson due to strength of schedule. When did losing become more acceptable than winning?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1298]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 11:56 AM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4 ] |
|
There well may be no undefeated SEC team. They would not put 2 1 loss SEC teams in, Ohio State, Penn State, Baylor can force committee to only put in 1 SEC team. Clemson has to win out, soild play, no close calls, defeat Gamecocks soundly and they are in. Just win win win. No turnovers and maintain the dominant defense. Recipe for Another Natty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [617]
TigerPulse: 98%
21
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:24 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4 ] |
|
I don’t know if they want to be impressed.... after all the wide margins we’ve beat every team except one by, all they want to measure us by is that one game!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:33 PM
|
|
Yep, just that one game away from home!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [10]
TigerPulse: 100%
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1298]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [122]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Thank goodness the championship is now settled on the field
Nov 5, 2019, 9:38 PM
|
|
Spot the ball!
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [7978]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
They don’t want to have to declare Clemson the dynasty over
Nov 5, 2019, 9:38 PM
|
|
Bama, and I mean all of them. I know it will play out and Clemson just needs to win, but it’s a joke. Top 4 next week when LSU loses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [775]
TigerPulse: 94%
22
|
Make The MFers Pay, Tigers!!! Take NO Prisoners!!***
Nov 5, 2019, 9:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [209]
TigerPulse: 100%
13
|
Re: Make The MFers Pay, Tigers!!! Take NO Prisoners!!***
Nov 5, 2019, 9:45 PM
|
|
I feel sorry for NC State this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Changer [1939]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Re: Make The MFers Pay, Tigers!!! Take NO Prisoners!!***
Nov 5, 2019, 9:51 PM
|
|
I hate it for the cooters as well! I would not be happy if I were a player, coach or fan of theirs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8049]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [3]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3253]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
committee is dumber than hades.***
Nov 5, 2019, 9:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: committee is dumber than hades.***
Nov 5, 2019, 9:58 PM
|
|
Well you have to know that Ken Hatfield hates us with a passion, and he will vote against us in every way possible, and he hates us bc we never welcomed him to Clemson, and was glad when he left. Danny Ford he was not, and there was no way that Tiger Nation was going to rub shoulders with him after Danny was run off. H&11, I still hate him for taking the HC job at Clemson  , and I still hate everybody that had anything to do with Danny being ask to leave!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game Day Hero [4493]
TigerPulse: 61%
36
|
Re: committee is dumber than hades.***
Nov 5, 2019, 10:24 PM
|
|
Ole Ken Hatfield has to leave the room when they vote for us. He can’t vote for or against.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: committee is dumber than hades.***
Nov 5, 2019, 10:34 PM
|
|
But he has a voice in the ears to the rest of them!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10738]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: committee is dumber than hades.***
Nov 5, 2019, 10:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: committee is dumber than hades.*** ] |
|
Agree - allorange - also don’t know how Frank Beamer and the Ga Tech AD feel toward Clemson ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: committee is dumber than hades.***
Nov 5, 2019, 11:32 PM
|
|
They are jealous, GT was always able to play with Clemson until Dabo, and now it's no contest, Dabo owns GT, and they hate it!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rival Killer [2855]
TigerPulse: 100%
33
|
I guess close calls to unranked Texas and Pitt
Nov 5, 2019, 9:40 PM
|
|
just go ignored if you’re in the SEC or Big Ten.
Media pundits say no one else besides Clemson has a close game like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [1192]
TigerPulse: 100%
26
|
time to bring the pain.
Nov 5, 2019, 9:41 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gridiron Giant [15646]
TigerPulse: 100%
50
Posts: 10039
Joined: 2016
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:42 PM
|
|
That decision has just about guaranteed the first back to back champions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:04 PM
|
|
Those idiots will never learn a thing will they, they should know by now that if they pisss on our boots and try telling us that it's raining, we are going to biotch slap the chit out of them, and expose them to being the idiot pieces of chit they really are, Goooo Tigers, kick the chit out of everybody in our way!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [49978]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 14622
Joined: 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [10738]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 12:04 AM
|
|
Nailed it - Humble .... Absolutely... nailed it !! - ">
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1405]
TigerPulse: 54%
29
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:43 PM
|
|
We're good because these teams have to play each other.
But I do love that the SEC had their 1 vs. 2 lovefest stolen from them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1013]
TigerPulse: 92%
25
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:46 PM
|
|
At this point this ranking doesn't matter since the four teams above us are playing each other so there will be two more teams with one loss. If we run the table without question we are in. GO TIGERS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1359]
TigerPulse: 60%
28
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:47 PM
|
|
I Love Clemson....but I have said this all year...we do not have the strength of schedule this year....and I am afraid that when we crush the remaining schools on the schedule...it will not be enough to get in .....if Alabama loses to LSU WE MIGHT HAVE A CHANCE...But if Alabama beats LSU it's over for us...unless one of those top four teams get beat in a upset...
All we can do is what's in our control...
Will be glad when tv contracts are up and we can get a larger playoff field!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [268]
TigerPulse: 100%
14
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:52 PM
|
|
I Love Clemson....but I have said this all year...we do not have the strength of schedule this year....and I am afraid that when we crush the remaining schools on the schedule...it will not be enough to get in .....if Alabama loses to LSU WE MIGHT HAVE A CHANCE...But if Alabama beats LSU it's over for us...unless one of those top four teams get beat in a upset...
All we can do is what's in our control...
Will be glad when tv contracts are up and we can get a larger playoff field!!!
Sorry, but what?! We’re a lock if we win out
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1091]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2119]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:01 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4 ] |
|
If Alabama beats LSU, then LSU is out.
Same with Ohio State and PenisState. They play in 2 weeks: One will knock the other out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1359]
TigerPulse: 60%
28
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:13 PM
|
|
If Alabama beats LSU it is not a sure thing that they are out....and if Ohio state loses To Penn state they are probably still in it also...our best hope is Penn and Alabama loses...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6575]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:20 PM
|
|
Cootastic analysis!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4 ] |
|
I Love Clemson....but I have said this all year...we do not have the strength of schedule this year....and I am afraid that when we crush the remaining schools on the schedule...it will not be enough to get in .....if Alabama loses to LSU WE MIGHT HAVE A CHANCE...But if Alabama beats LSU it's over for us...unless one of those top four teams get beat in a upset...
All we can do is what's in our control...
Will be glad when tv contracts are up and we can get a larger playoff field!!!
What kinda pessimistic idiot are you. You sure u not a fan of the sec. You sound more like a bandwagoner than a true fan. You should think before u speak and use a little common sense. Clemson is not ucf and a Clemson team that's riding on the nation's longest winning streak and is a power 5 conference champion having won 2 of the last three national championships in a conference that has three Natty's in the last 6 yrs and had more teams with a bowl game appearence over last 3 yrs, will no way in hell be left outside looking in behind any one loss anybody. You can join the rest of the hater nation sit ur ### down and watch what Clemson is avout . I think the media speaks enuff negativity about our team that we don't need no so called fans with their opinions writing it on tigernet. You gotta be a ###### northerner. Get off the bandwagon and find a team that likes pessimistic fans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:23 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4 ] |
|
I Love Clemson....but I have said this all year...we do not have the strength of schedule this year....and I am afraid that when we crush the remaining schools on the schedule...it will not be enough to get in .....if Alabama loses to LSU WE MIGHT HAVE A CHANCE...But if Alabama beats LSU it's over for us...unless one of those top four teams get beat in a upset...
All we can do is what's in our control...
Will be glad when tv contracts are up and we can get a larger playoff field!!!
What kinda pessimistic idiot are you. You sure u not a fan of the sec. You sound more like a bandwagoner than a true fan. You should think before u speak and use a little common sense. Clemson is not ucf and a Clemson team that's riding on the nation's longest winning streak and is a power 5 conference champion having won 2 of the last three national championships in a conference that has three Natty's in the last 6 yrs and had more teams with a bowl game appearence over last 3 yrs, will no way in hell be left outside looking in behind any one loss anybody. You can join the rest of the hater nation sit ur ### down and watch what Clemson is avout . I think the media speaks enuff negativity about our team that we don't need no so called fans with their opinions writing it on tigernet. You gotta be a ###### northerner. Get off the bandwagon and find a team that likes pessimistic fans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27025]
TigerPulse: 100%
54
Posts: 12774
Joined: 2014
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:47 PM
|
|
Wouldn’t want to be NC State Saturday night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3586]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Wouldn’t want to be NC State Saturday night.
Nov 6, 2019, 7:47 AM
|
|
If the committee were to somehow stick with their current choices I pity our Orange Bowl opponent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2194]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: Wouldn’t want to be NC State Saturday night.***
Nov 6, 2019, 8:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2194]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3586]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Wouldn’t want to be NC State Saturday night.
Nov 6, 2019, 5:31 PM
|
|
You go ahead and boycott. My family hopes to qualify for really good seats if we end up in the Orange Bowl. (At least THEY appreciate us!!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2445]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Ken Hatfield says hello.***
Nov 5, 2019, 9:48 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Ken Hatfield says hello.***
Nov 5, 2019, 10:10 PM
|
|
And we sayyyyy, FK you Kenny boi!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1457]
TigerPulse: 68%
29
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:48 PM
|
|
This is a member of the college football playoff committee
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [603]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Ok for real
Nov 5, 2019, 9:49 PM
|
|
AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO JUST REALIZED, the worst coach I'm Clemson history Hatfield is on the committee? How is that possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: Ok for real
Nov 5, 2019, 10:11 PM
|
|
BC he sucks ASSSSSSSS!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [603]
TigerPulse: 100%
21
|
Yes
Nov 5, 2019, 10:29 PM
|
|
Yes sir he did, he does, and always will
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2194]
TigerPulse: 100%
32
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:50 PM
|
|
Thank you AD Dan Radakovich for continuing to schedule these weak fbs schools which in combination with the weak link ACC affects our SOS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [663]
TigerPulse: 95%
21
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 9:55 PM
|
|
Poke bear
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1698]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Wofford, SC State, Furman are not the problem
Nov 5, 2019, 10:05 PM
[ in reply to Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4 ] |
|
the real problem is miami, va tech, fsu not being who they were when they joined the conference... they were admitted for their football teams, Syracuse and ND for their bball teams...
these "football" schools need to get their stuff together and add the value to conference that they are being paid for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid Orange [1359]
TigerPulse: 60%
28
|
Re: Wofford, SC State, Furman are not the problem
Nov 5, 2019, 10:17 PM
|
|
You are exactly correct!!!...until these school get their programs back on track, we will be dealing with this crap!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8049]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Wofford, SC State, Furman are not the problem
Nov 5, 2019, 10:23 PM
|
|
You are exactly correct!!!...until these school get their programs back on track, we will be dealing with this crap!!!
I disagree. We played these same teams and were a #1 overall seed after losing to one of these same teams you are saying need to get their act together!
This is all about "how TL16" looked early in the season. Who looks more impressive versus perceived tougher competition! If we had blown N. Carolina out the way we should have we would be somewhere around 2 or 3. As it stands - there is nothing wrong with where we are. "AN UNDEFEATED POWER 5 CHAMPION WITH A 28 GAME WINNING STREAK WILL NOT BE LEFT OUT THE CFP"!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: Wofford, SC State, Furman are not the problem
Nov 5, 2019, 10:32 PM
|
|
When has Syracuse football ever been a factor in any conference . LMFAO at ur Idiocracy
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1698]
TigerPulse: 100%
31
|
Don't live to be a troll...
Nov 6, 2019, 1:37 AM
|
|
Go back and read s-l-o-w-l-y, "Syracuse and ND were added for their bball teams"... bball = basketball in every sports conversation...
It was never stated that Syracuse was supposed to add anything to football... ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3586]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Wofford, SC State, Furman are not the problem
Nov 6, 2019, 7:42 AM
[ in reply to Re: Wofford, SC State, Furman are not the problem ] |
|
Cuse actually had some pretty decent seasons in the late 80s and mid 90s. They just haven't added much glitter to ACC football other than the year they nearly knocked us out.
But the big problem is the train wreck that used to be mighty FSU. We used to get some respect for playing even a close game against them, and now it doesn't help our rank to blow them out of the water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9778]
TigerPulse: 55%
44
Posts: 12850
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [122]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Will an undefeated reigning national champion be left out?
Nov 5, 2019, 9:58 PM
|
|
If the teams in the current top 4 ONLY lose to one of the other teams in the current top 4, will an undefeated Clemson still be at #5 in the final BCS committee rankings in December due to a supposed weak schedule?
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Champion [8049]
TigerPulse: 100%
42
|
Re: Will an undefeated reigning national champion be left out?
Nov 5, 2019, 10:03 PM
|
|
If the teams in the current top 4 ONLY lose to one of the other teams in the current top 4, will an undefeated Clemson still be at #5 in the final BCS committee rankings in December due to a supposed weak schedule?
It won't matter! Close Win is greater than a loss; even to a top 5 team! Plus, conference champions, if we win our! We in if we handle business the next few weeks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offensive Star [337]
TigerPulse: 97%
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3135]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: Will an undefeated reigning national champion be left out?
Nov 5, 2019, 10:20 PM
|
|
Minnesota is not a great team. They were barely getting by early in the season to a FCS school and other weak teams. They have gotten better, but Penn St will win by 14 or so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3135]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [122]
TigerPulse: 100%
11
|
Re: Will an undefeated reigning national champion be left out?
Nov 5, 2019, 10:37 PM
[ in reply to Will an undefeated reigning national champion be left out? ] |
|
If I’m Penn State at number 4 and my only loss ends up being to an undefeated Ohio State, can’t I make the argument that I should still be at least #4? Same if I’m ‘Bama and my only loss ends up being to an undefeated LSU in Baton Rouge! I realize the committee won’t keep an undefeated Clemson out of it, but seems to me they should have placed us at least at #4 now to fend off those arguments down the line! Plus, I’m just getting tired of the disrespect for the program Dabo has built!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [1091]
TigerPulse: 100%
25
|
TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:01 PM
|
|
Is no one else excited by this? I for one love it from the standpoint that Dabo is already one of the all time great motivators and they just gave him a freakin nuke for ammo...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trainer [27]
TigerPulse: 90%
3
|
I have no words!
Nov 5, 2019, 10:08 PM
|
|
This is a shame! Clemson needs to sit back and watch the first four teams lose out. Some team has to lose. Then Clemson will sneak back in the top four. Wait and watch! In the mean time, Go Tigers beat the Wolf Packs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dynasty Maker [3135]
TigerPulse: 100%
34
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:08 PM
|
|
Honestly why in the world do they even release it this early. Obviously to bring interest, but that is all it is at this point.
If anyone is concerned about this ranking, it is much to do about nothing.
I love where they put our Tigers. This will create a nice chip on the shoulders per se.
Us against the world boys!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Spirit [9778]
TigerPulse: 55%
44
Posts: 12850
Joined: 2006
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:10 PM
|
|
Not surprised at all. The only poll that matters is the last one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:31 PM
|
|
Rest assured they will be looking for any shred of a reason to keep Clemson out, and I think they want Bama out of it also, but Bama is the oldest kid on that block, and they would have to do some big lying and underhanded chit to kick Bama out but, they are wanting new blood in the playoffs and in the natty game. If by some way they get their way, just don't watch any of it and hope their TV ratings hit the very bottom. So far down that a re-run of Naked and Afraid will have better rating!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [3]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:15 PM
|
|
|
|
They'll regret this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [4]
TigerPulse: 100%
1
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:19 PM
|
|
It's all about ratings! 2 of the top 4 will lose and we'll move in. All we have to do is take care of business. That's what we do. No need to get upset. The will not leave an undefeated, defending National Champion out of the playoffs. Take care of us and let the rest fall by the wayside and be GOBSMACKED!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Beast [6575]
TigerPulse: 100%
40
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 10:24 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Time Great [97823]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 97350
Joined: 2009
|
HOW CAN THEY DO THIS TO ME!?!
Nov 5, 2019, 10:30 PM
|
|
signed
Dave Doeren
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [3673]
TigerPulse: 100%
35
|
Re: HOW CAN THEY DO THIS TO ME!?!
Nov 5, 2019, 11:26 PM
|
|
How is Iowa a marquee win? They lost close to Mich and Penn St, beat Rutgers, Mid Tenn, Iowa St, NW (w/o HJ?), Miami Ohio, and Purdue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Sports Icon [59584]
TigerPulse: 100%
59
Posts: 60994
Joined: 2007
|
Re: HOW CAN THEY DO THIS TO ME!?!
Nov 5, 2019, 11:36 PM
|
|
This committee is balless, and they're making it up as they go, and they knew that Saban would call them out if they left Bama out!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Cub [12]
TigerPulse: 80%
2
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 11:24 PM
|
|
I think your logic is off CFP! We'll see in December!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger Titan [49978]
TigerPulse: 100%
58
Posts: 14622
Joined: 2012
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 5, 2019, 11:30 PM
|
|
I guess UGA big loss to u of suc didn’t affect their strength of schedule etc. it’s all bull crap!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1298]
TigerPulse: 100%
27
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 8:13 AM
|
|
Been there done that. Dabo vs SEC 16-9. Clemson beatdown of Alabama and Tua 44-16. SEC close games with Ga, Auburn others. Dominant Florida Defence falls to Ga. Maybe SEAC not so dominant you think. Clemson Ohio Sate 31-0 Dec 2016.Clemson vs Ohio state CU 3 Buckeyes 0 1978 to 2019. Clemson defeated LSU Chick fil Bowl 2012. Clemson defeated Penn State and Papa Joe in last meeting in Citrus Bowl 35-10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [133]
TigerPulse: 58%
11
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 8:31 AM
|
|
Nothing changes much except maybe motivation, so leave the posturing and pride of being in the top four aside, and know there are two trap games left on this schedule, and Clemson has been trapped before. Wake Forest will prove a bother but if we are mistake-free we're okay. SC, however, already has one scalp and would like nothing better in the universe than to send Clemson to a secondary bowl. I think we should and will win both, but I am not counting my championships yet.
(It is interesting though, given the eye test, Clemson has waxed Alabama, LSU and Ohio State in previous playoffs. Waxed as in battered them, save for LSU in regular season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [251]
TigerPulse: 91%
14
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 8:58 AM
|
|
I think the ACC is stronger this year than most, parity is hurting us because we knock each other off. Seems like CFS is missing that point (Ped State barely beat Pitt, ND barely beat VT, UVA and UNC and Wake are stronger than they typically are, Duke and Miami are a tough out....remember FL just narrowly escaped Miami). There’s enough one-off head to head comparisons out there too like UNC beat USC and USC beat UGA, etc. but at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter. Also, one other complaint....Hatfield....I’d like to know how he voted!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [251]
TigerPulse: 91%
14
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 8:58 AM
|
|
I think the ACC is stronger this year than most, parity is hurting us because we knock each other off. Seems like CFS is missing that point (Ped State barely beat Pitt, ND barely beat VT, UVA and UNC and Wake are stronger than they typically are, Duke and Miami are a tough out....remember FL just narrowly escaped Miami). There’s enough one-off head to head comparisons out there too like UNC beat USC and USC beat UGA, etc. but at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter. Also, one other complaint....Hatfield....I’d like to know how he voted!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [251]
TigerPulse: 91%
14
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 8:58 AM
|
|
I think the ACC is stronger this year than most, parity is hurting us because we knock each other off. Seems like CFS is missing that point (Ped State barely beat Pitt, ND barely beat VT, UVA and UNC and Wake are stronger than they typically are, Duke and Miami are a tough out....remember FL just narrowly escaped Miami). There’s enough one-off head to head comparisons out there too like UNC beat USC and USC beat UGA, etc. but at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter. Also, one other complaint....Hatfield....I’d like to know how he voted!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [70]
TigerPulse: 97%
8
|
Re: TNET: Clemson not in first Playoff ranking top-4
Nov 6, 2019, 9:05 AM
|
|
We all saw this coming because this was premeditated. The lobbying began last year when the Big 10 got left out. Then you got the SEC who thinks that no one else matters. It’s really sad how the media is now a propaganda machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 85
| visibility 3502
|
|
|
50
