|
Replies: 13
| visibility 2,427
|
Hall of Famer [20080]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16763
Joined: 11/28/00
|
D Henry won't be the best RB on the field much less the...
Jan 2, 2016, 11:32 PM
|
|
...best player in the Natty.
ERRBODY KNOWS THEY STOLE THE HEISMAN FROM DESHAUN WATSON!!!!
That is all.
|
|
|
|
 |
Legend [15863]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 28958
Joined: 9/18/01
|
I would say McCaffrey & Watson got ripped off
Jan 2, 2016, 11:35 PM
|
|
easy
Watson & Mccaffreey being a soph -- I sorta understand him getting up but Henry was given a gift because he is in the sec
If watson was playijng in the sec & undefeated he would have won easy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20080]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16763
Joined: 11/28/00
|
Re: I would say McCaffrey & Watson got ripped off
Jan 2, 2016, 11:37 PM
|
|
True that
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29963]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8867
Joined: 10/31/10
|
Yep. Very impressed with MCaffery in his bowl. Fast, agile
Jan 2, 2016, 11:52 PM
|
|
and versatile. Of course DW has much more to do as far as running a offense, reads, etc., and is crazy athletic as well, but McC was impressive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29963]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8867
Joined: 10/31/10
|
Just not impressed with Henry at all...
Jan 2, 2016, 11:38 PM
|
|
He's huge, top heavy, and has zero acceleration. Once he gets about 3 steps he can lumber through the line, but has no burst and no lateral cuts at all. Hit him early, before he works up some steam, and he's a very average, albeit big, back.
Coker is surprisingly mobile when he has to be. Not exactly a scrambler, but far, far from a statue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6506]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10139
Joined: 11/2/03
|
Re: Just not impressed with Henry at all...
Jan 2, 2016, 11:40 PM
|
|
The ONLY thing that impresses me about Henry is his durability. Backs in modern football do not have the number of carries he has.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [505]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 904
Joined: 10/8/12
|
Re: Just not impressed with Henry at all...
Jan 2, 2016, 11:57 PM
|
|
But what about all those yards against those mighty SEC defenses?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6506]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10139
Joined: 11/2/03
|
Re: Just not impressed with Henry at all...
Jan 3, 2016, 12:04 AM
|
|
Due to number of carries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58631]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46415
Joined: 4/23/00
|
B b b b but Bama!***
Jan 2, 2016, 11:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8015]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7922
Joined: 5/27/08
|
Henry was, at best, the 4th best RB
Jan 2, 2016, 11:57 PM
|
|
IMO:
1. McCaffrey
2. Fournette
3. Cook
4. Henry
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [583]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 698
Joined: 11/26/07
|
So Gallman is 5***
Jan 3, 2016, 12:18 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8015]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7922
Joined: 5/27/08
|
I wasn't including him due to a conflict of interest
Jan 3, 2016, 12:31 AM
|
|
Because every Clemson player is the best in the country to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [6]
TigerPulse: 32%
Posts: 38
Joined: 1/1/16
|
Re: D Henry won't be the best RB on the field much less the...
Jan 3, 2016, 12:38 AM
|
|
The Heisman voters thought otherwise. Your beef should be with them, not Derrick Henry. Just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17758]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14222
Joined: 10/24/10
|
Henry tough back but question NFL speed ... Greg Jones/FSU
Jan 3, 2016, 1:25 AM
|
|
comes to mind as a comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 2,427
|
|
|
50
